Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:

A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.

It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.

Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.

LATEST UPDATES

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19


18 March travel to the UK changes

If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
  • take any COVID-19 tests – before you travel or after you arrive
  • fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel

This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.

You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.

*****

The following historical information is retained for the time being.

The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.

Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules

England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)

Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html

Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made

Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)

Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf

Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)


PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[

Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.

This means that you can:[list]
  • Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
    • On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
      • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        Alternatively:
        • Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
          • Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
          • On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
            • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.

        If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.

        Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :
        • Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
          • Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.

Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.

DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, £160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just £120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for £18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.

Useful data sources:

New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments


Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
  • LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
  • PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
  • NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
Print Wikipost

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2020, 10:16 am
  #2866  
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 241
Originally Posted by flyingcrazy
Aruba will be off the list. Cases skyrocketing. Likely because they were one of the few islands to reopen to US visitors.
Not according to https://www.visitaruba.com/news/gene...avel-to-aruba/ Mostly locals.
LETTERBOY likes this.
BXK_Oz is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 10:27 am
  #2867  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,830
Originally Posted by vanillabean
I have long wanted to do something like AUA-YYZ-MAD-OPO-PDL April 22 35K UA. Is the status of the Azores much like Aruba, do you think?
You can fly directly to PDL from YYZ or JFK, either on SATA or on a TAP codeshare, it is likely to be a shorthaul A320 though. But the Azores are clear of Covid-19, but they do have a rigorous testing and self isolating process in place (and are not admitting USA citizens given it is in Schengen).
vanillabean likes this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 10:45 am
  #2868  
Community Director
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norwich, UK
Programs: A3*G, BA Gold, BD Gold (in memoriam), IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 8,478
Originally Posted by orbitmic
Guardian suggesting decision will be delayed till at least tomorrow as fate of Malta and Netherlands is sealed (plus two Caribbean destinations) but there is disagreement on what to do about France. They suggest the delay was ordered by the PM.
This is strongly supported by Sky News:
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavir...-list-12048642

Lots of language in the report about not making an exception for our "closest friends". Looks more likely than not to disappear sooner rather than later.

Originally Posted by Sky News
Mr Johnson however insisted that it was essential to prevent more infection being brought into Britain from abroad.

Speaking while on a visit to Northern Ireland, he continued: "We have got to be absolutely ruthless about this, even with our closest and dearest friends and partners.

"I think everybody understands that.
NWIFlyer is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 11:10 am
  #2869  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ABZ/NCL
Posts: 2,943
Originally Posted by BXK_Oz
It's skyrocketed though. It's definitely local transmission but must have been imported when the borders opened.

Shows the inevitable really. NZ take note!
Silver Fox and the810 like this.
flyingcrazy is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 11:11 am
  #2870  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 1,578
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
You can fly directly to PDL from YYZ or JFK, either on SATA or on a TAP codeshare, it is likely to be a shorthaul A320 though. But the Azores are clear of Covid-19, but they do have a rigorous testing and self isolating process in place (and are not admitting USA citizens given it is in Schengen).
Speaking from recent experience in the Azores; you must present evidence of a negative covid test that's less than 72 hours old on arrival (they have a facility at the airports for this). If you don't have any, you can be tested immediately and are put into isolation until your result returns. If you're staying longer than a week, you're required to be tested again on the 6th day.
armouredant is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 11:39 am
  #2871  
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 241
Originally Posted by flyingcrazy
It's skyrocketed though. It's definitely local transmission but must have been imported when the borders opened.

Shows the inevitable really. NZ take note!
All visitors must have a covid test 12-72 hours prior to arriving. It may have been imported or just lingering. If imported, could have been done by a citizen of any country authorized to visit, not just the US.,
BXK_Oz is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 12:04 pm
  #2872  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,541
+2669 cases in 24 hours in France. I can see why there are disagreements on what to do about this. The figures are still worsening though the deterioration is still relatively slow/progressive compared to what happened, say, in Belgium, Malta, or Spain when the decision was taken to remove them from the quarantine free list.

So I guess the question is what matters more here, "level" or "slope", as it seems to me that so far, both have been taken into account. If level, France is now above 30 and even if things improve, she will not go back below that level for a few weeks as there is a certain kinetic force at play in how figures evolve once measures are taken.

At the same time, if slope, Belgium moved from 30/100k to 60/100k cases in about 1 week, Spain and Malta in even less than that. In France, on the current rhythm of deterioration, it would likely take about 2-3 weeks for the same to happen (the deterioration seems to be about 30%. There isn't an "out of control spiral" as there was in those countries, and the deterioration is quite a bit slower than in the Netherlands too, but it is obviously still a deterioration.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 12:38 pm
  #2873  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,237
Originally Posted by NWIFlyer
This is strongly supported by Sky News:
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavir...-list-12048642

Lots of language in the report about not making an exception for our "closest friends". Looks more likely than not to disappear sooner rather than later.
Considering the incredible surplus of testing, can't they keep some corridors open and test the hell out of returnees instead of shutting the door (and sacking contact tracers)?

We've swung from letting everyone in without a check (up until May) to shutting everything down. This government reminds me of my first driving lesson, swerving from side to side.
the810 likes this.
13901 is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 1:00 pm
  #2874  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,258
Originally Posted by 13901
Considering the incredible surplus of testing, can't they keep some corridors open and test the hell out of returnees instead of shutting the door (and sacking contact tracers)?

We've swung from letting everyone in without a check (up until May) to shutting everything down. This government reminds me of my first driving lesson, swerving from side to side.
There was a clear U-turn in Government policy when the Government realized their initial approach was far too lax and they'd messed up badly, partly due to a slightly arrogant 'UK knows best, not these Johnny Foreigners' approach, no matter what evidence from elsewhere in the world might suggest. Since that point though, I think the UK Government policy has been pretty consistently strict (at least publicly, where certain Government advisers have not followed that policy is another topic....) and mostly the right choices. I'm not sure I see 'swerving from side-to-side' here, just the UK government doing a much better job of actually reacting to events. If you drive in a straight line forever without turning, you are liable to eventually crash, in your metaphor.

Testing everyone doesn't help you if someone gets infected by someone else on the flight and the case is not yet visible, potentially leading to a number of infected passengers from this flight entering the country and spreading it further.
lost_in_translation is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 1:11 pm
  #2875  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,564
Originally Posted by orbitmic
+2669 cases in 24 hours in France. I can see why there are disagreements on what to do about this. The figures are still worsening though the deterioration is still relatively slow/progressive compared to what happened, say, in Belgium, Malta, or Spain when the decision was taken to remove them from the quarantine free list.

So I guess the question is what matters more here, "level" or "slope", as it seems to me that so far, both have been taken into account. If level, France is now above 30 and even if things improve, she will not go back below that level for a few weeks as there is a certain kinetic force at play in how figures evolve once measures are taken.

At the same time, if slope, Belgium moved from 30/100k to 60/100k cases in about 1 week, Spain and Malta in even less than that. In France, on the current rhythm of deterioration, it would likely take about 2-3 weeks for the same to happen (the deterioration seems to be about 30%. There isn't an "out of control spiral" as there was in those countries, and the deterioration is quite a bit slower than in the Netherlands too, but it is obviously still a deterioration.
I think that the deterioration is worse than 30%
Tuesday 6 August was 1,604 cases with a 7-day average of 1,295 and a 7-day /100k of 13.
Tuesday 13 August is 2,669 cases with a 7-day average of 1,961 and a 7-day /100k of 20.5

It looks like a 60% increase.The Netherland looks definitely much worse in terms of slope, but the situation in France is not good.
.
brunos is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 1:17 pm
  #2876  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,564
Originally Posted by lost_in_translation
There was a clear U-turn in Government policy when the Government realized their initial approach was far too lax and they'd messed up badly, partly due to a slightly arrogant 'UK knows best, not these Johnny Foreigners' approach, no matter what evidence from elsewhere in the world might suggest. Since that point though, I think the UK Government policy has been pretty consistently strict (at least publicly, where certain Government advisers have not followed that policy is another topic....) and mostly the right choices. I'm not sure I see 'swerving from side-to-side' here, just the UK government doing a much better job of actually reacting to events. If you drive in a straight line forever without turning, you are liable to eventually crash, in your metaphor.

Testing everyone doesn't help you if someone gets infected by someone else on the flight and the case is not yet visible, potentially leading to a number of infected passengers from this flight entering the country and spreading it further.
UK is still the only country that let anyone enter (with or without somewhat-lax home quarantine). And lots of pax have taken advantage to go to France (and possibly other countries) by transiting in LHR.

I am not judging who is right, but I would not call that "consistently strict".
13901 likes this.
brunos is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 1:22 pm
  #2877  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,258
Originally Posted by brunos
UK is still the only country that let anyone enter (with or without somewhat-lax home quarantine). And lots of pax have taken advantage to go to France (and possibly other countries) by transiting in LHR.

I am not judging who is right, but I would not call that "consistently strict".
It depends on your perspective, it’s lax from an Asian perspective but plenty of FTers are saying the UK government is being too restrictive. The UK government seems to be pretty obsessed by nudge theory, my guess is they’ve decided the cost benefit analysis is still OK even without major enforcement of the quarantine policies if enough people choose to follow it.
lost_in_translation is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 1:32 pm
  #2878  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,564
Originally Posted by lost_in_translation
It depends on your perspective, it’s lax from an Asian perspective but plenty of FTers are saying the UK government is being too restrictive. The UK government seems to be pretty obsessed by nudge theory, my guess is they’ve decided the cost benefit analysis is still OK even without major enforcement of the quarantine policies if enough people choose to follow it.
Keeping borders fully open is lax from Asia, European, North or South American, Australian/NZ perspectives.
Whatever some British vacationers feel.
Again, I am not judging whether it is right or wrong, but it is clearly exceptional.
brunos is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 1:41 pm
  #2879  
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,516
14-day COVID-19 case notification rate per 100 000, weeks 31-32 (ECDC - published 13 August 2020)





Geographic distribution of COVID-19
Geographic distribution of 14-day cumulative number of reported COVID-19 cases per 100 000 population, worldwide, as of 13 August 2020


Last edited by NewbieRunner; Aug 13, 2020 at 3:27 pm Reason: Added world map
NewbieRunner is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2020, 1:42 pm
  #2880  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC, Eurostar
Posts: 3,293
Originally Posted by brunos
Keeping borders fully open is lax from Asia, European, North or South American, Australian/NZ perspectives.
Whatever some British vacationers feel.
Again, I am not judging whether it is right or wrong, but it is clearly exceptional.
Remember that poverty also kills, in more insidious ways. Keeping economies shut doesn't work for extended periods of time. And countries like the UK who depend so much on external trade will need that to keep its economy from sinking completely.

However if you have a look at regional figures in France, it's Paris and the South East coast, where a lot of migrations happen in the summer, which are hardest hit. There's a middle ground to be found somewhere...
LETTERBOY, the810 and PVDtoDEL like this.
alex67500 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.