Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:

A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.

It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.

Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.

LATEST UPDATES

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19


18 March travel to the UK changes

If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
  • take any COVID-19 tests before you travel or after you arrive
  • fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel

This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.

You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.

*****

The following historical information is retained for the time being.

The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.

Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules

England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)

Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html

Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made

Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)

Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf

Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)


PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[

Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.

This means that you can:[list]
  • Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
    • On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
      • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        Alternatively:
        • Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
          • Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
          • On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
            • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.

        If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.

        Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :
        • Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
          • Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.

Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.

DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, 160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just 120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for 18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.

Useful data sources:

New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments


Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
  • LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
  • PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
  • NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
Print Wikipost

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2020, 3:41 am
  #2266  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: clue is in the nym
Programs: BA Gold, TP Gold, VS Gold, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by Dan1113
Are there any other countries being flagged as worries at this point?
Croatia's numbers are looking bad - 14-day case rate is still only 3/4ths of Spain's figure (29/100k vs 39/100k) but the trend is upward.

Beyond that, I'd keep an eye on Luxembourg and Czech Republic which are both trending upward sharply.
ahmetdouas likes this.
southlondonphil is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 3:51 am
  #2267  
Hilton 10+ BadgeAccor 10+ Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Rhineland-Palatinate
Programs: *A Gold (A3), HHonor Gold
Posts: 5,718
Originally Posted by Dan1113
I'm nervous about the French numbers but don't know if they're bad enough to get back on the naughty list. They don't report on weekends though so not sure how it's been the last day or two.
Here is the weekly report key points for this week:
  • Increase of Re to 1.26-1.29 (Continental France only)
  • Case occurrence increase by 29% compared to previous weeks
  • 26% increases of ER acts
  • Increase of cases for all ages range, including +75.yo for the first time since April
  • ICU used beds are not decreasing anymore
  • Increase of cases is superior to increase of tested persons
In short, if you want to go to France go now, do not wait 2-3 weeks.
fransknorge is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 3:51 am
  #2268  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 64,043
Originally Posted by Dan1113
Are there any other countries being flagged as worries at this point?
The best way I can answer that is to say that using the 14 day "Attack Rate" (confirmed infections per 100,000 population), the Travel Corridor countries above the UK are currently

Luxembourg 208.34
Croatia 29.02
Belgium 21.23
Czech Republic 18.96
Austria 17.41
UK 14.68

Spain is 39.44
Portugal 39.05

If you take the 7 day cumulative, double it, and compare, with the actual 14 day, then you can see where things are recently getting worse - this shows if the trend is going the wrong way in the last week if the figure below is higher than the figure above.

Luxembourg 251
Croatia 28
Belgium 20
Czech Republic 24
Austria 18
UK 14

Spain would be 51
Portugal 31

Regard Luxembourg as a city spike. When you have only 600,000 citizens and you are measuring in units of 100,000, it's not really useful to over analyse it.

From the above, you will see why Spain is now a problem, Portugal is slowly going the right way but isn't there yet, and everywhere else is less problematic.

The above is using yesterday's data 25 July, the JBC figures were based on Friday.
wilsnunn likes this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 4:11 am
  #2269  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 82
a more useful figure would be the total of hospital admissions a positive test is only an indication of having the virus not the seriousness of it which at this stage is what matters.

Last edited by Stephen Harwood; Jul 26, 2020 at 4:12 am Reason: missing word
Stephen Harwood is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 4:24 am
  #2270  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 64,043
Originally Posted by Stephen Harwood
a more useful figure would be the total of hospital admissions a positive test is only an indication of having the virus not the seriousness of it which at this stage is what matters.
No, I would disagree. What makes the disease serious is the person it infects - age, BAME, deprivation, gender, co-morbidities. These vary hugely within Europe (hugely within the UK). So hospital admissions will tell you how old your population is, essentially. Kosovo has a big uptick in infections (122 per 100k Attack Rate), if you go there you are at risk, and at higher risk you will bring it back to your local population. But Kosovo has very few people in hospital. Why? Because over half the country is under 30 years old.

Last edited by corporate-wage-slave; Jul 26, 2020 at 4:31 am
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 6:16 am
  #2271  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,660
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
The best way I can answer that is to say that using the 14 day "Attack Rate" (confirmed infections per 100,000 population), the Travel Corridor countries above the UK are currently

Luxembourg 208.34
Croatia 29.02
Belgium 21.23
Czech Republic 18.96
Austria 17.41
UK 14.68

Spain is 39.44
Portugal 39.05

If you take the 7 day cumulative, double it, and compare, with the actual 14 day, then you can see where things are recently getting worse - this shows if the trend is going the wrong way in the last week if the figure below is higher than the figure above.

Luxembourg 251
Croatia 28
Belgium 20
Czech Republic 24
Austria 18
UK 14

Spain would be 51
Portugal 31

Regard Luxembourg as a city spike. When you have only 600,000 citizens and you are measuring in units of 100,000, it's not really useful to over analyse it.

From the above, you will see why Spain is now a problem, Portugal is slowly going the right way but isn't there yet, and everywhere else is less problematic.

The above is using yesterday's data 25 July, the JBC figures were based on Friday.
Any data for Sweden? I've seen that the Norwegians seem to be allowing a few more of their provinces access as their numbers are going in the right way for some time.

Edited to add, I've just answered my own question - they're up at 40.1.
Dave_C is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 6:23 am
  #2272  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,603
Indeed.
I was just watching a French TV report.
French has progressively moved away from lockdown since May. French youth are now rather careless and not wearing masks or attending parties.
The increase in positive tests was mostly among young people and almost none would go to hospitals. But you now see that they have infected older people and hospitals are (slowly) starting to admit new covid patients.
What will be the situation in 2 weeks is, of course, a question mark.
brunos is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 6:44 am
  #2273  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 64,043
Originally Posted by Dave_C
Edited to add, I've just answered my own question - they're up at 40.1.
I get the same figure. More promisingly, their 7 day figure is 16.77, so if we double that we get 34, so they seem to be trending downwards (perhaps at the position the UK was a few weeks back). If so maybe in a couple of weeks they will get off the top of the table. From what I've seen, getting from 50 to 20 can be fairly quick, with proper controls in place, then it gets a bit of a slog to get the figures down further. Since I did my earlier post, E-CDC has updated their data, and UK has gone from 14.68 to 14.60, which illustrates the slow journey. But it also means somewhere like Sweden can get into the same ballpark more quickly than the UK can nudge down to below 10. Denmark is a useful benchmark (8.47) since they test at a similar proportion of the population as the UK and use similar methodologies.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 8:12 am
  #2274  
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 43,100
Still no SI which removes Spain from the exemption list?
KARFA is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 8:31 am
  #2275  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 64,043
Originally Posted by KARFA
Still no SI which removes Spain from the exemption list?
Monday maybe. But the reality is that the legislative underpinning could easily be taken apart, HMG is working on the basis that this is more about persuading people to do the right thing rather than coming up with tightly worded statutory instruments.
KARFA likes this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 9:14 am
  #2276  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ABZ/NCL
Posts: 2,943
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
Monday maybe. But the reality is that the legislative underpinning could easily be taken apart, HMG is working on the basis that this is more about persuading people to do the right thing rather than coming up with tightly worded statutory instruments.
So essentially it's advice right now and not legally binding?
flyingcrazy is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 10:55 am
  #2277  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,553
-oops
Dan1113 is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 11:10 am
  #2278  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,553
If, in theory, you knew someone travelling in France now...who had the option to continue in France for two more weeks or go somewhere else "safer", to avoid quarantine, what would you advise? France is likely totally fine or run away now? For a return to the UK in two weeks.
​​​​​
Dan1113 is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 11:33 am
  #2279  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: GLA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 2,965
Originally Posted by flyingcrazy
So essentially it's advice right now and not legally binding?
I very much doubt that.

Im not sure what powers UK Ministers are using, but I assume they are analogous to the powers under the Public Health (Scotland) Act 2008, which allow, in emergency situations, Scottish Ministers to make regulations under the made affirmative procedure. This means that Ministers can make the regulations (I.e. sign them and have them take effect almost immediately) before Parliament has even seen them. Parliament must then approve them within 28 days or they fall.

I suspect, therefore, that the regulations have been made (I.e. signed by a Minister) and have already taken effect, and are therefore law (indeed the SG news release intimated that the measures In the SSI would take effect at 0001 this morning). It might take a day or two for legislation.gov.uk and the parliaments websites to catch up.
Scots_Al is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2020, 11:46 am
  #2280  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 64,043
Originally Posted by Dan1113
If, in theory, you knew someone travelling in France now...who had the option to continue in France for two more weeks or go somewhere else "safer", to avoid quarantine, what would you advise? France is likely totally fine or run away now? For a return to the UK in two weeks.
​​​​​
Crystal ball stuff that, who knows? However the current 14 day cumulative is 14.59 and the 7 day is 8.74 x 2 = 17, so it would seem OK to me unless things go out of control. One could monitor the stats and see if one stays a few days ahead of the 40 figure. But there are many safer places, eg. Estonia 1.43, and the nearest country with a land border to France on the lower list is Italy, 5.03.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.