47 CO Pax Imprisoned Overnight on Stinky E145 @ Rochester, MN
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
47 CO Pax Imprisoned Overnight on Stinky E145 @ Rochester, MN
Is this what we @ MSP can expect from CO now that our local service has been downgraded to mostly Barbie-class aircraft?
Nine hours? Nine hours on a friggin' E145 where the "aisle" is a trough between the seats and many/most adult males can't even stand up in the plane?
Someone at Continental better wake & ensure that this episode is not repeated. And don't pass the buck off on the regional -- the customer's contract is with Continental.
Link: http://www.startribune.com/local/east/52798827.html
Originally Posted by Star Tribune
Instead, he was among 47 passengers who spent the night trapped inside a small airplane, parked at the Rochester airport, complete with crying babies and the aroma of over-used toilets.
The ExpressJet Airlines that operated the plane says the flight was diverted to Rochester because of Twin Cities thunderstorms, and that airline regulations prevented passengers from getting off the plane.
Christin is incredulous that the airline couldn't figure out an option besides trapping passengers on the plane for nine hours.
The ExpressJet Airlines that operated the plane says the flight was diverted to Rochester because of Twin Cities thunderstorms, and that airline regulations prevented passengers from getting off the plane.
Christin is incredulous that the airline couldn't figure out an option besides trapping passengers on the plane for nine hours.
Someone at Continental better wake & ensure that this episode is not repeated. And don't pass the buck off on the regional -- the customer's contract is with Continental.
Link: http://www.startribune.com/local/east/52798827.html
Last edited by MikeMpls; Aug 9, 2009 at 6:55 am Reason: spelling
#2
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando
Programs: DL 4MM/PM, UA 1MM/Gold, AA Paper
Posts: 1,386
This situation is exactly why we need a Passengers Bill of Rights.
#3
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Marylebone
Programs: BA/BD Gold, UA Silver
Posts: 1,873
9 hours stuck inside a RJ? Why wasn't there a passenger revolt? I wouldn't be surprised if this results in a lawsuit.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Originally Posted by Star Tribune
As light began to fill the cabin around 6 a.m., the plane doors opened and passengers were allowed into the airport terminal, Christin said. The airlines gave them one free beverage, he said. By about 9:30 a.m., the passengers were sent back on the same plane they had spent the night in -- which by this time had no functioning restroom. They landed in the Twin Cities about 11 a.m.
ExpressJet apologizes for the incident, Nicholas said. But passenger safety and the legal requirements of airlines were top priorities.
ExpressJet apologizes for the incident, Nicholas said. But passenger safety and the legal requirements of airlines were top priorities.
If I were on that plane, after a certain point, I'd be much more concerned with crew safety.
I know -- that's what prompted the verbiage you quoted.
#5
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: HH Silver, MR Plat Prem & LT Plat, Hyatt Plat,SPG Plat, Hertz PC, National EE, UA 1K
Posts: 3,405
#6
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BOS-TLV
Programs: Lots of them, no status
Posts: 1,318
As much as the airline is OBVIOUSLY to blame, I really personally am also having a hard time getting past the sheeple mentality of the pax. I mean seriously, would ANY of you tolerate this?
No way in heck I would be.
No way in heck I would be.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2003
Location: AA Plat / UA NOTHING / Alaska 75K / Hyatt Diamond / SPG LT Plat / Marriott Gold / Priority Club Plat / Hertz Pres
Posts: 24,710
I'm not encouraging this the following behaviour but at some point if I were a passenger on this plane I would've been threatening to pop the emer exit. That's if for some reason I was unable to get CNN on the phone.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BOS-TLV
Programs: Lots of them, no status
Posts: 1,318
It's clear no one did anything about it because the media would have eaten that for lunch as it was happening. They love that kind of thing.
...and I see your threat of popping the emergency exit and raise you an evacuation slide.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2003
Location: AA Plat / UA NOTHING / Alaska 75K / Hyatt Diamond / SPG LT Plat / Marriott Gold / Priority Club Plat / Hertz Pres
Posts: 24,710
I'm pretty much a CO homer but some things are simply unacceptable. I can deal with a throughly busy runway in EWR. I can handle with any weather delay or cancellation that's out there. But if the issue described in the opening post happened to me, I'd be taking matters into my own hands.
#11
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston
Programs: UA: MM
Posts: 844
FWIW
DLM
#12
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: New York / Hawaii
Programs: UA Global Services, HH Diamond
Posts: 5,178
#13
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Moreland Hills (CLE)
Programs: Over-entitled UA 1.3MM Gold, AA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott L-T Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 5,521
Pop The Overwing Exit
Pop an emergency exit.
At least a holding cell at the airport would be more comfy than a Jungle Jet.
At least a holding cell at the airport would be more comfy than a Jungle Jet.
#14
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest CT
Programs: DL Diamond and Million Miler, Marriott Titanium Elite, Hertz Pres Circle
Posts: 7,618
Absolutely incredible that this is still happening today. A Passenger Bill of Rights is certainly needed.
Mike, if you have any updates about this in your local MSP papers and news sites, please let us know.
Mike, if you have any updates about this in your local MSP papers and news sites, please let us know.
#15
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,034
What's a good medical emergency you could fake and them suddenly feel better from once at a gate? In this case the crew probably wouldn't mind this little bit of "help".
But seriously, whether CO is liable due to their relationship with the regional remains to be seen, but the fact is that CO operations downtown (SOCC) does not control Express Jet, Express Jet ops controls Express Jet. Is SOCC, in addition to controlling every CO flight in the air at any given moment, supposed to also monitor every regional flight that they have a contract with as well?
And if they did know about it, what was CO supposed to do? That would be like saying that Express system ops would have any control over a mainline CO flight. Two separate operations.
Your main gripe is with Express Jet operations center.
But seriously, whether CO is liable due to their relationship with the regional remains to be seen, but the fact is that CO operations downtown (SOCC) does not control Express Jet, Express Jet ops controls Express Jet. Is SOCC, in addition to controlling every CO flight in the air at any given moment, supposed to also monitor every regional flight that they have a contract with as well?
And if they did know about it, what was CO supposed to do? That would be like saying that Express system ops would have any control over a mainline CO flight. Two separate operations.
Your main gripe is with Express Jet operations center.