TCON upgrades
Feb 24, 2009, 1:23 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York
Programs: Delta PM
Posts: 199
TCON upgrades
Hi all,
Relatively new to this forum... have been predominantly a Delta boy. I'm testing "the grass is greener" theory on Continental. So far, so good. I've done a bit of searching but still keep coming back to my basic question:
Are there better transcon flights (looking at EWR-SFO) now on securing an upgrade as a platinum elite? On Delta, I'd managed to figure out the flights when the loads up front were generally lighter. I'm self-employed so flexible on travel times.
Also -- is there anything really different between the 737s and the one 757-300 that seems to do the last flight westward bound and then the red-eye return? or is it just more first seats crammed in there?
thanks in advance,
NYCt
Relatively new to this forum... have been predominantly a Delta boy. I'm testing "the grass is greener" theory on Continental. So far, so good. I've done a bit of searching but still keep coming back to my basic question:
Are there better transcon flights (looking at EWR-SFO) now on securing an upgrade as a platinum elite? On Delta, I'd managed to figure out the flights when the loads up front were generally lighter. I'm self-employed so flexible on travel times.
Also -- is there anything really different between the 737s and the one 757-300 that seems to do the last flight westward bound and then the red-eye return? or is it just more first seats crammed in there?
thanks in advance,
NYCt
Feb 24, 2009, 6:18 am
#2
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY
Programs: CO Plat
Posts: 73
As a Plat, the only times I've ever gotten upgrades EWR-SFO or SFO-EWR are very early Saturday or Sunday morning (flythis route 1-3 times a month). I have noticed in the past few months that upgrades (1-2 total per flight) have happened for those on higher fares than me as where it used to be none per flight.
As far as the 753 vs. the 738, the seats are exactly the same, not sure about the AVOD.
As far as the 753 vs. the 738, the seats are exactly the same, not sure about the AVOD.
Feb 24, 2009, 6:35 am
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
As far as the 753 vs. the 738, the seats are exactly the same, not sure about the AVOD.
Feb 24, 2009, 7:03 am
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under the Liberty Visual to 27L at PHL. Stranger in a strange land - a Devils fan in Flyers country.
Programs: PWP Le Chancelier des Clefs d'Or || Sarcasm, Anti-Stupidity, Obscure References top tier member.
Posts: 24,061
CO could probably run aircraft that are set up with as many premium seats as a UA PS jet on EWR-LAX/SFO and still be in the position to deny people upgrades or paid F availability. Some people have seen upgrade standby lists in the 60's, and Plats on H or B-esque fares have pretty regularly reported being in the back.
Feb 24, 2009, 7:18 am
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,432
If you want an upgrade on an EWR-SFO flight you either need to buy it or be very, very lucky. Paid first class sells out on these flights, sometimes a week or so in advance.
Feb 24, 2009, 7:49 am
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL Diamond, B6 Mosaic, AS MPV Gold, UA Gold MM, Marriott Plat, SPG Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite
Posts: 16,679
No AVOD on the 753. The 753s have the slider seats, where the seat pan slides forward slightly as you recline. I think they're more comfortable, although I've never sat in an ex-ATA 753 in Y. The 753s also have 32" pitch in Y, while the 737s have 31". That inch does make a difference.
Feb 24, 2009, 8:42 am
#8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAS, SAT, IAH
Programs: Flying Nut
Posts: 6,365
Depending on where you are headed into the Bay area, you could try SJC but I dont know if you would do any better. SMF is the next closests airport but it is 2 hours away I believe. So not many choices for now. Perhaps things will change with *.
Feb 24, 2009, 9:06 am
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
And SMF only gets the OP to IAH on a non-stop, which may be less than desirable.
Feb 24, 2009, 9:38 am
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,521
SMF is an hour and a half from SF. Considering you will have your rental car within minutes (and at half the cost of SFO), it is a viable alternative. If you are flying into SF to do wine country, it is actually your best bet.
Feb 24, 2009, 9:40 am
#11
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York NY
Programs: UA Gold, CO Plat, CO Million Miler
Posts: 2,617
The main advantage of the 757-300 is that their are 50% more available for your unlikely upgrade making it somewhat less unlikely.
The 8:00am SFO-EWR flight is typically a 757-200 with International Business-First seating although regular transcon service. It's very unlikely that you will upgrade on this flight (16 FC seats) but it you can do a B or Y-up, it's a treat. Also has AVOD in all seats.
The 8:00am SFO-EWR flight is typically a 757-200 with International Business-First seating although regular transcon service. It's very unlikely that you will upgrade on this flight (16 FC seats) but it you can do a B or Y-up, it's a treat. Also has AVOD in all seats.
Feb 24, 2009, 10:09 am
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/6719570-post17.html
Feb 24, 2009, 9:05 pm
#13
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York
Programs: Delta PM
Posts: 199
I am very much looking forward to not getting upgraded on my transcons. As Plat on Delta I was 12/12 last year. I may stick with DL for NYC-SFO/LAX.
From what I'm hearing EWR-IAH-SFO/LAX may be better shot at the upgrade, though I don't think I can stomach the layover.
Thanks everyone.
Feb 24, 2009, 9:52 pm
#14
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF
Programs: UA Silver, AS MVP
Posts: 83
For what it's worth, I was 1/2 in December for EWR-SFO / SFO-EWR with Gold status. The outbound flight (~8am departure) was only half full, so I was able to lie down across an entire row and slept the entire way there.
The inbound flight, I got a battlefield upgrade - quite surprised, as I was 5th on the list.
The inbound flight, I got a battlefield upgrade - quite surprised, as I was 5th on the list.
Feb 24, 2009, 9:55 pm
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,572
Thanks for all the responses, though this was certainly my favorite I am very much looking forward to not getting upgraded on my transcons.
As Plat on Delta I was 12/12 last year. I may stick with DL for NYC-SFO/LAX.
From what I'm hearing EWR-IAH-SFO/LAX may be better shot at the upgrade, though I don't think I can stomach the layover.
Thanks everyone.
I am very much looking forward to not getting upgraded on my transcons. As Plat on Delta I was 12/12 last year. I may stick with DL for NYC-SFO/LAX.
From what I'm hearing EWR-IAH-SFO/LAX may be better shot at the upgrade, though I don't think I can stomach the layover.
Thanks everyone.