Heathrow Lounge?
#46
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
That sure looks like it would be an improvement over the Hilton Health Club, though still not up to the standards of a real Arrivals lounge like they had in Gatwick last year (I heard they moved the Arrivals at Gatwick since then, so I'm not sure what the situation was more recently).
#47
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,619
Can anyone verify this?
I spoke to a concierge last night at EWR, he mentioned that arriving BF customers now have access to the YOTEL at LHR T4? Apparently this decision was made a few days ago, and he was able to reference this in SHARES.
Appears to be an interesting concept, looking forward to using it in a few weeks when I make my inaugural LHR run on CO. ^
https://www.yotel.com/default.aspx
I spoke to a concierge last night at EWR, he mentioned that arriving BF customers now have access to the YOTEL at LHR T4? Apparently this decision was made a few days ago, and he was able to reference this in SHARES.
Appears to be an interesting concept, looking forward to using it in a few weeks when I make my inaugural LHR run on CO. ^
https://www.yotel.com/default.aspx
I'll be flying into LHR in a month, needless to say I'm somewhat disappointed in this downgrade in service compared to when I flew into LGW last summer ... I really don't understand what is so great about LHR over LGW, they're both a short train ride from the city ...
#48
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: CO Gold; SPG Gold***; AvisFirst;
Posts: 3,970
Flew in to LHR this morning. The Yotel is indeed being used as the arrivals lounge. Seems that you may actually need to follow the web instructions and let the BF Concierge know before you board. I asked at EWR and he put my name, "on the list."
Upon arrival in LHR, the person greeting the flight (whom I thought was the concierge) seemed unsure. When I asked about the arrivals lounge, he said that he, "believed" I should go to the Yotel.
When I arrived at the Yotel (about 10 min later - no lines at immigration - IRIS scanner was not working), a CO rep arrived at the same time with the, "list" of people from the flight who were expected. I was not asked for my BP, just my name, which was checked against the list.
Now... as to the Yotel... I was not at all impressed. In fact, should I plan on traveling BF with my spouse on a redeye, I'd either go to LGW or take a different airline.
What you get at the Yotel:
There is food, coffee, etc., for the normal charge.
I asked, out of curiosity, as to how long one could remain in the, "room." I was told that the time limit for BF arrivals is 4 hours (although one could pay for more).
Space is extremely limited. The stand for the suitcase can only be used by blocking the door. There is a fold-up table which one needs for toiletries, etc, as there is no way to put anything on or near the sink.
All in all, I think if CO is serious about business travelers, they're going to have to come up with something better. I know this is going to sound sexist, but I believe that most female business travelers would not find the lounge acceptable. Large males would not find the lounge usable.
One other point about LHR arrival - in order to take the Heathrow Express into London it was necessary to take a train to Terminals 1/2/3, then connect to terminal 5 and then board the Heathrow Express. Door-to-door, the Gatwick express is faster than Heathrow Express connecting from Terminal 4.
Note also that I don't understand the second connection as the Heathrow Express stopped at terminals 1/2/3 after leaving terminal 5.
Upon arrival in LHR, the person greeting the flight (whom I thought was the concierge) seemed unsure. When I asked about the arrivals lounge, he said that he, "believed" I should go to the Yotel.
When I arrived at the Yotel (about 10 min later - no lines at immigration - IRIS scanner was not working), a CO rep arrived at the same time with the, "list" of people from the flight who were expected. I was not asked for my BP, just my name, which was checked against the list.
Now... as to the Yotel... I was not at all impressed. In fact, should I plan on traveling BF with my spouse on a redeye, I'd either go to LGW or take a different airline.
What you get at the Yotel:
- A bed
- A TV
- Wired internet (I assume for a fee)
- A telephone
- A very, small bathroom, sink shower. Not possible to shower without contacting the shower curtain, and sink.
- A liquid soap dispenser with a very liquidy soap.
- 2 towels
- A glass
- Dim lighting
There is food, coffee, etc., for the normal charge.
I asked, out of curiosity, as to how long one could remain in the, "room." I was told that the time limit for BF arrivals is 4 hours (although one could pay for more).
Space is extremely limited. The stand for the suitcase can only be used by blocking the door. There is a fold-up table which one needs for toiletries, etc, as there is no way to put anything on or near the sink.
All in all, I think if CO is serious about business travelers, they're going to have to come up with something better. I know this is going to sound sexist, but I believe that most female business travelers would not find the lounge acceptable. Large males would not find the lounge usable.
One other point about LHR arrival - in order to take the Heathrow Express into London it was necessary to take a train to Terminals 1/2/3, then connect to terminal 5 and then board the Heathrow Express. Door-to-door, the Gatwick express is faster than Heathrow Express connecting from Terminal 4.
Note also that I don't understand the second connection as the Heathrow Express stopped at terminals 1/2/3 after leaving terminal 5.
#49
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,619
Thanks for the update ...
I really don't understand how on earth CO thought it was a good idea to invest $200 million + in moving operations from LGW to LHR ... I've only flown in/out of LHR once myself compared to a handful of times at LGW and I just don't get what is supposed to be so great about LHR ... I thought it was that it had direct tube service, but after spending what seemed like an hour on the tube riding from Central London to LHR last year, I don't think that could be it ... are there really that many travellers out there who prefer LHR to LGW?
I really don't understand how on earth CO thought it was a good idea to invest $200 million + in moving operations from LGW to LHR ... I've only flown in/out of LHR once myself compared to a handful of times at LGW and I just don't get what is supposed to be so great about LHR ... I thought it was that it had direct tube service, but after spending what seemed like an hour on the tube riding from Central London to LHR last year, I don't think that could be it ... are there really that many travellers out there who prefer LHR to LGW?
#50
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: EWR, USA, AA 1MM Gold, United Premier Gold, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Emerald Club Executive
Posts: 1,476
Thanks for the update ...
I really don't understand how on earth CO thought it was a good idea to invest $200 million + in moving operations from LGW to LHR ... I've only flown in/out of LHR once myself compared to a handful of times at LGW and I just don't get what is supposed to be so great about LHR ... I thought it was that it had direct tube service, but after spending what seemed like an hour on the tube riding from Central London to LHR last year, I don't think that could be it ... are there really that many travellers out there who prefer LHR to LGW?
I really don't understand how on earth CO thought it was a good idea to invest $200 million + in moving operations from LGW to LHR ... I've only flown in/out of LHR once myself compared to a handful of times at LGW and I just don't get what is supposed to be so great about LHR ... I thought it was that it had direct tube service, but after spending what seemed like an hour on the tube riding from Central London to LHR last year, I don't think that could be it ... are there really that many travellers out there who prefer LHR to LGW?
#51
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: CO Gold; SPG Gold***; AvisFirst;
Posts: 3,970
Thanks for the update ...
I really don't understand how on earth CO thought it was a good idea to invest $200 million + in moving operations from LGW to LHR ... I've only flown in/out of LHR once myself compared to a handful of times at LGW and I just don't get what is supposed to be so great about LHR ... I thought it was that it had direct tube service, but after spending what seemed like an hour on the tube riding from Central London to LHR last year, I don't think that could be it ... are there really that many travellers out there who prefer LHR to LGW?
I really don't understand how on earth CO thought it was a good idea to invest $200 million + in moving operations from LGW to LHR ... I've only flown in/out of LHR once myself compared to a handful of times at LGW and I just don't get what is supposed to be so great about LHR ... I thought it was that it had direct tube service, but after spending what seemed like an hour on the tube riding from Central London to LHR last year, I don't think that could be it ... are there really that many travellers out there who prefer LHR to LGW?
#52
Company Representative, United Airlines
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, Houston, or somewhere in between
Posts: 2,176
Hi Beckles, we are now using both the Hilton London Heathrow and the Yotel Heathrow Terminal 4 for our BusinessFirst arrivals showers. We are using the Yotel more frequently because it's a shorter walk and our customers seem to prefer these accomodations over the fitness center at the Hilton. In addition to a shower, the small-but-functional Yotel cabins have a bed, complimentary broadband internet access, a 20" flatscreen TV and a room service menu. If you'd rather use the fitness center at the Hilton, just let our Concierge know when you arrive.
#53
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,619
Hi Beckles, we are now using both the Hilton London Heathrow and the Yotel Heathrow Terminal 4 for our BusinessFirst arrivals showers. We are using the Yotel more frequently because it's a shorter walk and our customers seem to prefer these accomodations over the fitness center at the Hilton. In addition to a shower, the Yotel cabins have a bed, complimentary broadband internet access, a 20" flatscreen TV and a room service menu. If you'd rather use the fitness center at the Hilton, just let our Concierge know when you arrive.
I know it wasn't your decision, but it really does boggle the mind how CO could spend over $200 million in slots for LHR but hasn't spent a penny on providing arrival facilities that are comparable to what is provided at LGW.
It would seem to me that food and drink should be included at the YOTEL if CO wanted to at least attempt to provide a level of service comparable to a true arrivals facility, such as the one at LGW.
Thank you for your response, I do appreciate it despite my displeasure with the content of the response (which I know you have no control of).
#54
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: CO Gold; SPG Gold***; AvisFirst;
Posts: 3,970
Hi Beckles, we are now using both the Hilton London Heathrow and the Yotel Heathrow Terminal 4 for our BusinessFirst arrivals showers. We are using the Yotel more frequently because it's a shorter walk and our customers seem to prefer these accomodations over the fitness center at the Hilton. In addition to a shower, the small-but-functional Yotel cabins have a bed, complimentary broadband internet access, a 20" flatscreen TV and a room service menu. If you'd rather use the fitness center at the Hilton, just let our Concierge know when you arrive.
I don't know what the Hilton is like, but I'm pretty sure my wife would be unhappy with the Yotel (see review above). Can't say I totally understand women, however I'm pretty sure this is not going to be a big hit with female business travelers. [All: Please don't flame me for being sexist.]
#55

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: UA GS (1MM), DL Gold, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Avis CC
Posts: 526
As much as I have flown in and out of LHR, I've never had to switch terminals, but here's my question:
If I'm connecting between VS flights (DXB-LHR-JFK) in T3, is it possible to get to airside T4 to use the Holideck lounge? I've used the lounge before (love it!) but I was flying out on KL and BA directly from T4. Unfortunately, this trip is in PE on VS, not UC, so no ClubHouse access
If I'm connecting between VS flights (DXB-LHR-JFK) in T3, is it possible to get to airside T4 to use the Holideck lounge? I've used the lounge before (love it!) but I was flying out on KL and BA directly from T4. Unfortunately, this trip is in PE on VS, not UC, so no ClubHouse access
#56




Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PBI and PVD
Programs: DL Gold, (used to be somebody here) Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 617
[*]Departures. For departures, we will be using the Holideck Lounge until our first-of-its kind SkyTeam Lounge debuts this Fall. In both cases, the lounges will be available to our departing BusinessFirst customers, Presidents Club members and eligible SkyTeam Elite Plus members/guests traveling on international SkyTeam itineraries.[/list][/QUOTE]
any update on the new Skyteam Lounge timetable?
any update on the new Skyteam Lounge timetable?

