Originally Posted by
Beckles
Thanks for the update ...
I really don't understand how on earth CO thought it was a good idea to invest $200 million + in moving operations from LGW to LHR ... I've only flown in/out of LHR once myself compared to a handful of times at LGW and I just don't get what is supposed to be so great about LHR ... I thought it was that it had direct tube service, but after spending what seemed like an hour on the tube riding from Central London to LHR last year, I don't think that could be it ... are there really that many travellers out there who prefer LHR to LGW?
Maybe they were already thinking of an AA/BA alliance?