Use of Runway 29/11 at EWR
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY
Programs: CO Plat
Posts: 73
Use of Runway 29/11 at EWR
I flew into EWR this afternoon on a 752, and, for the first time I have experienced, we landed runway 29 (this is the single runway that runs east-west at the north end of the airport.
Since I am sure someone here will know...how often is this runway used for regular jets, and, for what reasons is it used?
I cant begin to count how many times I've landed at EWR over the last 15-20 years and this was the 1st time the plane I was on used this runway. It was very interesting to take such a different landing pattern into the airport, especially with all of the tight turns required in the last few minutes of the flight.
Since I am sure someone here will know...how often is this runway used for regular jets, and, for what reasons is it used?
I cant begin to count how many times I've landed at EWR over the last 15-20 years and this was the 1st time the plane I was on used this runway. It was very interesting to take such a different landing pattern into the airport, especially with all of the tight turns required in the last few minutes of the flight.
![Rebigulator is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#2
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: IAH
Programs: OnePass
Posts: 102
They use it when the winds are very strong west to east or other way around.
I have seen 777 landing on it too.
I have seen 777 landing on it too.
![EWR Rocks is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
Runway 11/29 is much shorter (6,800 ft) than the two North-South runways at EWR (4R/22L 10,000 ft and 4L/22R 11,000 ft).
Runway 11/29 also does not have an ILS which allows for highly precise landings. Instead. 11/29 has an LOC/GS which requires more manual operation during landing.
This is one reason a CO 757 fairly recently landed on a parralel taxiway at 11/29.
Runway 11/29 also does not have an ILS which allows for highly precise landings. Instead. 11/29 has an LOC/GS which requires more manual operation during landing.
This is one reason a CO 757 fairly recently landed on a parralel taxiway at 11/29.
![TWA Fan 1 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 27 minutes north of EWR (on a good day)
Programs: UA PLAT, SPG PLAT. Collector of Chase UR points
Posts: 11,527
I have only been on one flight that had used that runway, I think it was an MD-80 in 2000 from ewr-mia
![jrzyshawn is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#5
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,660
Runway 11/29 is much shorter (6,800 ft) than the two North-South runways at EWR (4R/22L 10,000 ft and 4L/22R 11,000 ft).
Runway 11/29 also does not have an ILS which allows for highly precise landings. Instead. 11/29 has an LOC/GS which requires more manual operation during landing.
This is one reason a CO 757 fairly recently landed on a parralel taxiway at 11/29.
Runway 11/29 also does not have an ILS which allows for highly precise landings. Instead. 11/29 has an LOC/GS which requires more manual operation during landing.
This is one reason a CO 757 fairly recently landed on a parralel taxiway at 11/29.
Runway 29 is generally used when strong wind conditions are out of the West/Northwest, and create a strong crosswind component for 4/22. I landed on this runway about two weeks ago, and requested it when we learned the winds were about 300 degrees gusting to 20 knots. Landing on runway 29 provided us with a wind that was generally on the nose, as opposed to a wind that was 80 degrees out at 20 knots.....which can be a challenge.
Runway 29 does not have an instrument approach, but we now use an approach procedure which provides precisely defined points, allowing the Flight Management System to fly what amounts to an artificially generated, precise approach to the runway.
There are several factors that went into the aircraft that landed 'right of course': Sun in the eyes, pavement color, non-standard runway markings, lighting system, etc. All of our visual guidance lighting (VASI) at EWR is on the left side of the landing area.....except for this runway, which has it located on the right side.....or the left of the taxiway in this case. It all added up.....
DRW
![doobierw is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
Runway 29 is generally used when strong wind conditions are out of the West/Northwest, and create a strong crosswind component for 4/22. I landed on this runway about two weeks ago, and requested it when we learned the winds were about 300 degrees gusting to 20 knots. Landing on runway 29 provided us with a wind that was generally on the nose, as opposed to a wind that was 80 degrees out at 20 knots.....which can be a challenge.
Runway 29 does not have an instrument approach, but we now use an approach procedure which provides precisely defined points, allowing the Flight Management System to fly what amounts to an artificially generated, precise approach to the runway.
There are several factors that went into the aircraft that landed 'right of course': Sun in the eyes, pavement color, non-standard runway markings, lighting system, etc. All of our visual guidance lighting (VASI) at EWR is on the left side of the landing area.....except for this runway, which has it located on the right side.....or the left of the taxiway in this case. It all added up.....
DRW
Runway 29 does not have an instrument approach, but we now use an approach procedure which provides precisely defined points, allowing the Flight Management System to fly what amounts to an artificially generated, precise approach to the runway.
There are several factors that went into the aircraft that landed 'right of course': Sun in the eyes, pavement color, non-standard runway markings, lighting system, etc. All of our visual guidance lighting (VASI) at EWR is on the left side of the landing area.....except for this runway, which has it located on the right side.....or the left of the taxiway in this case. It all added up.....
DRW
Also, is R11 ever used?
One of my favorite approaches is Runway 31 at LGA, with the Runway 4 approach and then the steep turns around Shea Stadium and Flushing Bay. It seems as is the average jet straightens out only in the last 10 sec or so...
Last edited by TWA Fan 1; Jan 30, 2008 at 7:44 pm
![TWA Fan 1 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#7
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Someone asked about this runway during our OPs tour session and the CO folks indicated that the runway is able to handle any aircraft that could otherwise land at EWR (including 747s), despite its short length. They don't use it incredibly often as it involves also limiting use of the 4/22s that it crosses, but we watched a plane or two land on it during our tour.
![sbm12 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,613
I'm pretty sure all traffic was landing on 29 around noon today when I was at EWR. I watched several widebodies land that way (a BA 777, a CO 777, the CO 762 I was on from IAH, the NW A330 from AMS). It's amazing how short the stopping distance they need is. It was much more entertaining than it usually is to watch from the CO terminals at EWR, which don't have the best view of 4/22.
I also saw a CO 737 go around - it looks like there is a fair bit less room for error if you don't quite line up right, so obviously better safe than sorry.
I also saw a CO 737 go around - it looks like there is a fair bit less room for error if you don't quite line up right, so obviously better safe than sorry.
![yellow77 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,559
During our tour of the CO ops tower the other day we saw a CO 752 land on 11. Everything else except for a few RJs was landing on 4.
![Xyzzy is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#10
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAS, SAT, IAH
Programs: Flying Nut
Posts: 6,365
I also think that once the Q400s come into play at EWR that they will be using this runway a lot as they have the ability for short take offs and landings and thus can use this runway at a shorter distance and thus not create havic in the system. and also help decrease delays
![Scott6067 is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Half the distance to EWR than PHL.
Programs: UA, AA, B6, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG, SPG
Posts: 11,695
I've had a fair share of ERJ flights to and from upsate NY take off and land on that runway in calm air.
![Olton Hall is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat
Posts: 11,505
I thought the flight that landed on the taxiway was after sunset (6:31pm EST). How would the sun be in the pilot's eyes?
![Hartmann is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#13
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Around 3-4pm today, the west facing windows in 30th floor office building I was in in Jersey City, got very crowded as we watched 9/11 height jets, head straight for us, only to turn 180 degrees and head back to land at EWR. We were pretty close to evacuating.
Definitely not a usual flight path.
Definitely not a usual flight path.
![xist2c is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#14
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OMA
Programs: UA
Posts: 322
doobierw,
I am only a GA instrument rated pilot so I've never flown into EWR myself. I realize this isn't a certified approach, but on a 29 approach can't you do a back course off of the ILS 11 to at least confirm you are lined up with the runway?
![Mr.Nuke is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#15
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 27
You will never see an ILS for RY29 because there's no room for it out in the Hudson river and it interferes with NY Tracon's airspace for LGA/JFK arrivals and departures. The Tracon has enough problems in this small 15-mile NY/NJ metro radius as it.
RY11 arrivals are used all the time during busy arrival periods of the day as an overflow runway to the main parallel runways. Most of the time, you'll see B737 and RJ's landing there. But when there's a strong headwind, you'll see anything on RY11/29 including B777's and A340's.
![forress is offline](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)