![]() |
|
SPG Passport to Free Weekends
|
Originally Posted by jrzyshawn
(Post 13997695)
|
Originally Posted by mwg25
(Post 13997655)
Not sure if I missed the boat, but I think you mentioned Cambridge - is your conference at Harvard or the other Institute in town? :) (or another location entirely)
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 13997705)
Hilarious. :-:
|
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 13997691)
My vote goes to a federal standard of expectations (what a child must know at each grade level) and the states and local districts can make changes to match that criteria. Get rid of the standardized testing and have district wide End-of-Course exams that measure the criteria.
|
Originally Posted by uncertaintraveler
(Post 13997769)
That still sounds like standardized testing to me.
With end-of-course exams that are district set, the tests would be more about the subject being taught, giving teachers the ability to actually teach their subject thoroughly. Also, the teachers would be in on the discussion on what's in the tests. |
Originally Posted by jrzyshawn
(Post 13997695)
Are there any DFW Boxers? I can't think of any off the top of my head, but forgive me if I'm forgetting one. :confused: |
Another thought from my ADHD-addled mind - I was itching last night at the Crowne Plaza Danvers, MA and thought it was the soap (there is indeed one commercial brand where I am allergic). This morning, I found a nice clump of pet hair ...
|
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 13997785)
No, because the state wouldn't be setting the test. As it is right now, every teacher has to take time out of their regular teaching to make sure the basics of a very generalized test are met.
With end-of-course exams that are district set, the tests would be more about the subject being taught, giving teachers the ability to actually teach their subject thoroughly. Also, the teachers would be in on the discussion on what's in the tests. In other news, the BD/Wyndham points are posting. You need to search your account for February-March to see the details. Mine are all wrong but I'm not going to waste energy fighting it. |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 13997826)
But if the tests vary so much how do you verify that the coursework is meeting the defined parameters at the federal level? It is a catch-22.
There's no catch-22, there's just a necessary simplicity to what the federal standards are. Right now the tests look at specific questions to figure out if a kid knows how to do a specific thing, rather than an understanding of a subject. |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 13997826)
In other news, the BD/Wyndham points are posting. You need to search your account for February-March to see the details. Mine are all wrong but I'm not going to waste energy fighting it.
|
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 13997845)
It's actually very simple, the parameters at the federal level are generalized. So, for math it would be "students have an understanding of Algebra I". Or you can be slightly more specific, "students must understand the quadratic equation".
There's no catch-22, there's just a necessary simplicity to what the federal standards are. Right now the tests look at specific questions to figure out if a kid knows how to do a specific thing, rather than an understanding of a subject. |
good morning box
|
Originally Posted by icurhere2
(Post 13997809)
Another thought from my ADHD-addled mind - I was itching last night at the Crowne Plaza Danvers, MA and thought it was the soap (there is indeed one commercial brand where I am allergic). This morning, I found a nice clump of pet hair ...
|
Originally Posted by ConciergeMike
(Post 13997894)
Ah, but therein lies the problem. You used "simplicity" and Federal" in the same sentence. :eek:
The state seems to have that problem as well. The TAKS test (standardized test for Texas) has become so convoluted and so relied upon for everything that it overshadows everything else. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:07 pm. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.