International First Class?
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
AA's new lie flat seats are angled-flat, and have been the subject of some scathing criticism over on the AA board. Sure, many AA flyers are excited at the prospect of a new J product over there, because just about anything would be an improvement over their present J offering.
Yes, the seat doesn't lay flat (but there is more legroom than on CO). But look at the whole package, how many more amenities and services are offered than in BF.
Here's a link: http://www.howwillyourtimefly.com/
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,887
Originally Posted by ContinentalFan
The advantage that AA has for me, on international flights, is that it's going to be easier to upgrade. I wasn't successful getting upgrades on international flights with CO--even with a Y fare, so I am giving up on the carrier.
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United LT-GS, AA LT-Plat, Hyatt LT-Globalist, Hilton LT-Diamond, Marriott LT-Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 15,832
Originally Posted by ijgordon
From my point of view, it doesn't bother me that AA's current business class isn't all that special. It's still infintely better than coach, and it's not all that hard to get up there, as opposed to many people's experiences with CO. Now, when I am flying for business, in paid J, well, then at least I have the opportunity to upgrade to real First Class -- with flat beds and lots of personal space. (Even AA's weaker "coffin" seat offering only has 18 pax in the front zone of the 777 vs. 30 on CO's BF.) And those J-to-F upgrades are very easy to come by. So net, even flying paid J is a better overall proposition for me on AA than CO, despite CO's mostly superior product. Except of course deciding whether to take CO's nonstop EWR-HKG or connect in NRT on AA, upgrading the JFK-NRT leg to F and slumming it in J on CX/JL for the final leg to HKG... Can't decide!
#19
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
Originally Posted by ContinentalFan
You share my sentiment exactly. I am angling for EXP this year, which I think is really what you need. At this level, I can pretty much fly business all the time, domestically; I can also upgrade to FC with a business fare!
Last edited by BenjaminNYC; Aug 5, 2006 at 8:08 am
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by BenjaminNYC
Sorry, but I think you're really confused about the AA system. AA only has three routes domestically which are three class service. JFK-LAX, JFK-SFO (about 50% of the time three-class) and JFK-MIA (1 or 2 flights a day three-class). On these routes, ANYONE can upgrade from a Business fare to First, you don't need to be EXP. In fact, your EXP free upgrades will NOT work to upgade you from J->F on these routes, and 500-miler stickers won't do so either for Plats and Golds. You, or anyone else, needs to use miles. Other than these few routes and flights, there is no domestic Business Class on AA.
In a few weeks, AA begins a 3 class 777 LAX-MIA-LAX once daily.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United LT-GS, AA LT-Plat, Hyatt LT-Globalist, Hilton LT-Diamond, Marriott LT-Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 15,832
Originally Posted by BenjaminNYC
Sorry, but I think you're really confused about the AA system. AA only has three routes domestically which are three class service. JFK-LAX, JFK-SFO (about 50% of the time three-class) and JFK-MIA (1 or 2 flights a day three-class). On these routes, ANYONE can upgrade from a Business fare to First, you don't need to be EXP. In fact, your EXP free upgrades will NOT work to upgade you from J->F on these routes, and 500-miler stickers won't do so either for Plats and Golds. You, or anyone else, needs to use miles. Other than these few routes and flights, there is no domestic Business Class on AA.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United LT-GS, AA LT-Plat, Hyatt LT-Globalist, Hilton LT-Diamond, Marriott LT-Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 15,832
Originally Posted by FWAAA
One correction: JFK-MIA is always two class, even when flown with a 3 class 762. Only 3 class domestics are JFK-LAX/SFO on 762s.
In a few weeks, AA begins a 3 class 777 LAX-MIA-LAX once daily.
In a few weeks, AA begins a 3 class 777 LAX-MIA-LAX once daily.

#23
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
Originally Posted by FWAAA
One correction: JFK-MIA is always two class, even when flown with a 3 class 762. Only 3 class domestics are JFK-LAX/SFO on 762s.
In a few weeks, AA begins a 3 class 777 LAX-MIA-LAX once daily.
In a few weeks, AA begins a 3 class 777 LAX-MIA-LAX once daily.

#24
Original Poster

Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA & MCO
Programs: DL Diamond, AA EXP & UA Gold
Posts: 3,051
Originally Posted by BenjaminNYC
Sorry, what's the correction?
#25
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
Originally Posted by Babu
JFK-MIA, when offered, is NOT sold as 3 classes even though a 3 class airplane is used. Elites and full fares can pre book the "Business Class" section, but its only coach service. First Class is treated as any other domestic 2 class route as far as upgrades go.
#26
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 235
I'd much rather they introduced a proper mid class like Virgins Premium Econ or BAs World Traveller Plus.
Much more comfortable and bigger seat with considerably more space than econ and slightly better service but still a damn site cheaper than business class.
Per square foot of the airplane Virgin and BA make more revenue from these sections than any other class.
Much more comfortable and bigger seat with considerably more space than econ and slightly better service but still a damn site cheaper than business class.
Per square foot of the airplane Virgin and BA make more revenue from these sections than any other class.
#27
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: AA Plat, HH Gold, SPG Gold, HH Gold, Marriott Silver, Amex Plat, GlobalEntry, SW A-List Preferred
Posts: 866
Originally Posted by Caber
I'd much rather they introduced a proper mid class like Virgins Premium Econ or BAs World Traveller Plus.
Much more comfortable and bigger seat with considerably more space than econ and slightly better service but still a damn site cheaper than business class.
Per square foot of the airplane Virgin and BA make more revenue from these sections than any other class.
Much more comfortable and bigger seat with considerably more space than econ and slightly better service but still a damn site cheaper than business class.
Per square foot of the airplane Virgin and BA make more revenue from these sections than any other class.

