EUA shenanigans????
#1
Original Poster


Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Homosassa, FL & Ringwood, NJ -UA-G(Lifetime); SPG-Plat (Lifetime)
Posts: 6,122
EUA shenanigans????
It appears that something is definitely going on with SOME CO flights and that EUA may be being bypassed and manipulated in SOME cases.
The following flights are within 35 to 1 hour and 10 minutes from departure. The curent time is 11:04 EDT. Remember that these are lunch flights on a Wednesday:
CO 148 EWR-SFO Dep 12:10 A9F0
CO1726 EWR-SAN Dep 11:40 A5F0
CO1281 EWR-SEA Dep 12:05 A9F0
Note that I got the same results when I checked ITN. Also note that other lunch flights I checked (all within the 3 hour EUA run) including EWR to IAH and CLE and FLL mostly showed the expected A0FO.
So it looks like we have the worst of all worlds. The changes don't really show a reliable pattern yet, and EUA is now totally unreliable for some city pairs at some times on some days.
I also suspect that the recent reports of some flights going out only 1/2 full in FC is also related to the non-EUA release of A seats, resulting in some elites sitting in the back because of lazy/overworked gate agents who can't be bothered upgrading 5-10 people at the last minute. And then the question would be, if they had the time, what method would they use to do the upgrades? Or is it at their discretion? (Worst situation of all).
I have no problem with CO doing this, AS LONG AS they make an announcement. Not doing so, however, borders on unethical, IMO.
The following flights are within 35 to 1 hour and 10 minutes from departure. The curent time is 11:04 EDT. Remember that these are lunch flights on a Wednesday:
CO 148 EWR-SFO Dep 12:10 A9F0
CO1726 EWR-SAN Dep 11:40 A5F0
CO1281 EWR-SEA Dep 12:05 A9F0
Note that I got the same results when I checked ITN. Also note that other lunch flights I checked (all within the 3 hour EUA run) including EWR to IAH and CLE and FLL mostly showed the expected A0FO.
So it looks like we have the worst of all worlds. The changes don't really show a reliable pattern yet, and EUA is now totally unreliable for some city pairs at some times on some days.
I also suspect that the recent reports of some flights going out only 1/2 full in FC is also related to the non-EUA release of A seats, resulting in some elites sitting in the back because of lazy/overworked gate agents who can't be bothered upgrading 5-10 people at the last minute. And then the question would be, if they had the time, what method would they use to do the upgrades? Or is it at their discretion? (Worst situation of all).
I have no problem with CO doing this, AS LONG AS they make an announcement. Not doing so, however, borders on unethical, IMO.
#2


Join Date: May 2002
Location: Moreland Hills (CLE)
Programs: Over-entitled UA 1.3MM Gold, AA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott L-T Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 5,526
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Vulcan:
CO 148 EWR-SFO Dep 12:10 A9F0
CO1726 EWR-SAN Dep 11:40 A5F0
CO1281 EWR-SEA Dep 12:05 A9F0
Note that I got the same results when I checked ITN.</font>
CO 148 EWR-SFO Dep 12:10 A9F0
CO1726 EWR-SAN Dep 11:40 A5F0
CO1281 EWR-SEA Dep 12:05 A9F0
Note that I got the same results when I checked ITN.</font>
I've called CO before when I've seen F seats on Aeroplan/Etour within my applicable EUA window. In all 3 cases the CO CSR told me that there were no F seats available.
It sure would not be surprising if CO was manipulating the EUA on certain flights with high probabilities of last-minute/walk-up first class fliers.
[This message has been edited by Billiken (edited 07-09-2003).]
#3
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Washington, DC USA
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 289
EUA is not a guarantee--CO make seats available for EUA that rev management feels will not sell. On popular full fare flights, they hold more seats back--if they don't sell them then they are given out at the airport. IMHO EUA is a bonus, not a right.
Nevertheless, I agree that it can be a confusing and sometimes infuriating system. . .
Nevertheless, I agree that it can be a confusing and sometimes infuriating system. . .
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: new york, ny, usa
Posts: 13,536
i think too much time is spent on this type of analysis (i.e., spying).
book and exit row seat and if an upgrade comes through, great. it usually does for platinum flyers.
it certainly can't be the "better" food you crave, is it? relax. you'll get your upgrade. all the analysis in the world won't change continental...it will only increase your blood pressure.
[This message has been edited by fly co to see the yanks (edited 07-09-2003).]
book and exit row seat and if an upgrade comes through, great. it usually does for platinum flyers.
it certainly can't be the "better" food you crave, is it? relax. you'll get your upgrade. all the analysis in the world won't change continental...it will only increase your blood pressure.
[This message has been edited by fly co to see the yanks (edited 07-09-2003).]
#5
Original Poster


Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Homosassa, FL & Ringwood, NJ -UA-G(Lifetime); SPG-Plat (Lifetime)
Posts: 6,122
I checked only ITN and e-tour and both agreed 100%.
I don't worry about my blood pressure and I don't worry about getting an upgrade. I fly only NW (72,000+ miles with a 100% upgrade rate).
Besides, this analysis is fun. It makes me feel like we have detected something that CO does not want us to know.
I WAS thinking about switching some business back to CO, but this new wrinkle has changed the game. Its back to nothing more than a gamble, with someone in yield management and maybe even the gate agent deciding whether or not I get the upgrade.
As I said, I don't mind CO doing this. All I want to know is the rules that everybody plays by, up front.
I don't worry about my blood pressure and I don't worry about getting an upgrade. I fly only NW (72,000+ miles with a 100% upgrade rate).
Besides, this analysis is fun. It makes me feel like we have detected something that CO does not want us to know.
I WAS thinking about switching some business back to CO, but this new wrinkle has changed the game. Its back to nothing more than a gamble, with someone in yield management and maybe even the gate agent deciding whether or not I get the upgrade.
As I said, I don't mind CO doing this. All I want to know is the rules that everybody plays by, up front.
#6
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 260
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by fly co to see the yanks:
i think too much time is spent on this type of analysis (i.e., spying).
book and exit row seat and if an upgrade comes through, great. it usually does for platinum flyers.
it certainly can't be the "better" food you crave, is it? relax. you'll get your upgrade. all the analysis in the world won't change continental...it will only increase your blood pressure.</font>
i think too much time is spent on this type of analysis (i.e., spying).
book and exit row seat and if an upgrade comes through, great. it usually does for platinum flyers.
it certainly can't be the "better" food you crave, is it? relax. you'll get your upgrade. all the analysis in the world won't change continental...it will only increase your blood pressure.</font>
Why do you care if others analyze this issue? And care enough to presume to tell others how they should behave and not behave, at that..."too much time spent (spying)"..."relax"....
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,683
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by tvx:
EUA is not a guarantee--CO make seats available for EUA that rev management feels will not sell. On popular full fare flights, they hold more seats back--if they don't sell them then they are given out at the airport. IMHO EUA is a bonus, not a right.</font>
EUA is not a guarantee--CO make seats available for EUA that rev management feels will not sell. On popular full fare flights, they hold more seats back--if they don't sell them then they are given out at the airport. IMHO EUA is a bonus, not a right.</font>
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: new york, ny, usa
Posts: 13,536
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by xyzzy:
I think the main complaint here is that some have noticed F going out 1/2 empty with elite members in the back when they should have been EUAd. I've not seen this happen myself, but others claim to have seen it.[/B]</font>
I think the main complaint here is that some have noticed F going out 1/2 empty with elite members in the back when they should have been EUAd. I've not seen this happen myself, but others claim to have seen it.[/B]</font>
[This message has been edited by fly co to see the yanks (edited 07-09-2003).]
#9
Original Poster


Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Homosassa, FL & Ringwood, NJ -UA-G(Lifetime); SPG-Plat (Lifetime)
Posts: 6,122
i didn't think this happened that often due to "battleship upgrades," or whatever they are called. i have very rarely seen open seats in first class on domestic flights this year.
"battlefield upgrades"
True about very few empty seats in FC (I will digress a bit and say that I do see empty FC sets on about 25% of NW flights, but they are becoming fewer and fewer).
It would be interesting to keep track of reports of FTers who report empty seats on CO. With all of the comps CO has given out, I assumed that it was very rare that there would not be one more silver on any flight that could not be upgraded. I've seen at least two reports recently on this board about empty seats. The question is whether these are an anomaly or are we spotting soemthing which is real across the network. Remember that, as a group, we have great exposure to all of CO's operations and because of this we may well detect if something is amiss that a single, non-FTer might pass off as a fluke.
If its not an anomaly, then maybe it is another sign that CO is messing with the EUA and it really is affecting upgrades. I would be pretty upset if I was elite and saw the front of the plane leave with many empty seats.
[This message has been edited by Vulcan (edited 07-09-2003).]
"battlefield upgrades"
True about very few empty seats in FC (I will digress a bit and say that I do see empty FC sets on about 25% of NW flights, but they are becoming fewer and fewer).It would be interesting to keep track of reports of FTers who report empty seats on CO. With all of the comps CO has given out, I assumed that it was very rare that there would not be one more silver on any flight that could not be upgraded. I've seen at least two reports recently on this board about empty seats. The question is whether these are an anomaly or are we spotting soemthing which is real across the network. Remember that, as a group, we have great exposure to all of CO's operations and because of this we may well detect if something is amiss that a single, non-FTer might pass off as a fluke.
If its not an anomaly, then maybe it is another sign that CO is messing with the EUA and it really is affecting upgrades. I would be pretty upset if I was elite and saw the front of the plane leave with many empty seats.
[This message has been edited by Vulcan (edited 07-09-2003).]
#10
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greenwich, CT, USA
Posts: 505
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by tvx:
IMHO EUA is a bonus, not a right.
</font>
IMHO EUA is a bonus, not a right.
</font>
The complaint asserted on this thread is that CO is claiming to offer a certain benefit that many people here feel is not actually offered in a substantive way.
To say you can upgrade before departure based on availability, but not to provide availability, is to say that you CAN'T upgrade before departure.
Just like if I said you can redeem a free ticket for 25,000 miles based on availability, and come to find out that very, very little availability exists--that has the effect that you CAN'T redeem a free ticket for 25,000.
I believe that's the point.
#11




Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MCI ** UA Silver, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,297
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Vulcan:
...I do see empty FC sets on about 25% of NW flights, but they are becoming fewer and fewer).</font>
...I do see empty FC sets on about 25% of NW flights, but they are becoming fewer and fewer).</font>
#12


Join Date: May 2002
Location: Moreland Hills (CLE)
Programs: Over-entitled UA 1.3MM Gold, AA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott L-T Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 5,526
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Vulcan:
.....I will digress a bit and say that I do see empty FC sets on about 25% of NW flights, but they are becoming fewer and fewer....</font>
.....I will digress a bit and say that I do see empty FC sets on about 25% of NW flights, but they are becoming fewer and fewer....</font>
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: new york, ny, usa
Posts: 13,536
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by holland:
but the flight to MSP serves a meal</font>
but the flight to MSP serves a meal</font>
#14
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York City & Cleveland, CO Plat as primary
Posts: 155
Xyzzy has a good point, for those like me whose nose is into every reason why as a Platinum I am not upgraded for a stupid reason...can we set a place to keep track of flights with empty FC or employees upgraded instead? I bet it is more than you think and Yes, I am sane and have a full time job.
#15
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Washington, DC USA
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 289
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by First in Class:
EUA is neither a bonus nor a right, it is benefit</font>
EUA is neither a bonus nor a right, it is benefit</font>
Still, the only "commitment" made by CO is that you will get space available upgrades automatically. . . .which leaves revenue management with a lot of responsibility to determine what is available.
I have flown a lot of flights over the past several years and have only flown in Y once when there was a seat open up front and that was my mistake (I was tired and accidently didn't add myself to the FC upgrade waiting list at the kiosk--dumb me. . .).
My record with EUA has been pretty good and the rest of my upgrades have come through battlefield promotions.
I also recently upgraded to BF to/from NRT for 25k miles (full fare Y) with no problem, so generally, my experience with OP has been very positive and perhaps that colors my view that sometimes shenanigans are not shenanigans. . . future experience may change that.

