Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Crazy Headwinds

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 2:53 pm
  #16  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: WAS
Programs: UA Gold, Marriott Gold Elite, CZR 7*, MGM Plat
Posts: 161
Enter Content
Tarpie is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 3:05 pm
  #17  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,816
Originally Posted by BigPoppaCO
lie-flat BF seats.
You were able to secure a BusinessFirst seat?
JFKSFOLAX_friend is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 3:52 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,345
Originally Posted by channa
Remember, too, that CO uses a very optimistic operating philosophy, and as a result, there's not much slack or padding in CO's system. So, if there's a longer-than-normal flight time, CO is less likely to be able to absorb it.
The difference amounts to 10 minutes eastbound and 10-20 minutes westbound. Note CO uses slower B73x equipment on many of their flights, while UA is all B752, which makes CO even more optimistic.

From the current schedules:
Code:
 carrier | origin | destination | max |  avg  | min
---------+--------+-------------+-----+-------+-----
 CO      | LAX    | EWR         | 320 | 312.5 | 299
 UA      | LAX    | JFK         | 330 | 320.7 | 318
 CO      | SFO    | EWR         | 332 | 322.4 | 310
 UA      | SFO    | EWR         | 333 | 333.0 | 333
 UA      | SFO    | JFK         | 345 | 333.0 | 319

 carrier | origin | destination | max |  avg  | min
---------+--------+-------------+-----+-------+-----
 CO      | EWR    | LAX         | 380 | 363.3 | 349
 UA      | JFK    | LAX         | 387 | 382.1 | 374
 CO      | EWR    | SFO         | 385 | 378.1 | 369
 UA      | EWR    | SFO         | 388 | 388.0 | 388
 UA      | JFK    | SFO         | 408 | 400.2 | 394
mduell is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 4:13 pm
  #19  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 10007.
Posts: 656
I've noticed a lot of CO's 737-900 westbound transcons have been diverting to Denver this week. Maybe this type isn't well suited for transcon flying? (The 737-800s haven't been diverting).
canard is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 4:55 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS & UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 11,580
Originally Posted by canard
I've noticed a lot of CO's 737-900 westbound transcons have been diverting to Denver this week. Maybe this type isn't well suited for transcon flying? (The 737-800s haven't been diverting).
Hmmm......I think CO has two (2) versions of the 739: the standard model and "ER" version which denotes the extended range model......

Can anyone confirm?
jlemon is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 4:58 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,345
Yes, C has both ER and non-ER -900s.
mduell is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 5:01 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS & UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 11,580
Originally Posted by mduell
Yes, C has both ER and non-ER -900s.
Oh come on......C??

They're not that bad, are they?
jlemon is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 5:21 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Platinum, UA Million Miler
Posts: 2,596
Originally Posted by JFKSFOLAX_friend
You were able to secure a BusinessFirst seat?
Yup. Outbound didn't clear but I had 7ABC to myself on the 757. With the winds flight time was 5.5. The return cleared at time of booking. After a handful of BF trips the past few months I can safely say I prefer the 757 to the 777
BigPoppaCO is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 8:31 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,345
Originally Posted by jlemon
Oh come on......C??

They're not that bad, are they?
The 9 non-ER or C? A latter is topic for the box, at best.
mduell is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2011 | 1:06 am
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Originally Posted by mduell
The difference amounts to 10 minutes eastbound and 10-20 minutes westbound. Note CO uses slower B73x equipment on many of their flights, while UA is all B752, which makes CO even more optimistic.
Good stuff.

Wow...I hadn't COnsidered the slower CO equipment. That really COmpounds their ptimism.
channa is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2011 | 1:21 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
3M
100 Nights
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA Plat (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 11,218
Thanks to fantastic tailwinds in winter I've had a 5.5 hour EWR-AMS flight. Yes, 5.5 all-in (take off to touch down).

That same winter there were reports of 3.5 hour SEA-EWR flights. When I flew SEA-EWR it took 4 hours. Still fast

Just last week I had a 6hr15min take off to touch down JFK-SEA flight (on DL, though).

-RM
RobOnLI is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2011 | 10:15 am
  #27  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: IAH
Programs: UACO Plat/1K, DL Plat, Hertz 5*, Avis - PC, SPG Gold, Colorado Pass
Posts: 228
DCA crosswinds

Landing at DCA on a RJ was quite a ride yesterday (02/19.) Not sure which runway it was but we flew along the potomac and then had to do a short bank to line up the runway. The wind was so strong that we could barely finish the bank so we had to wave off. I don't think we were much higher than 100-200 ft from the ground.

We came back around and it was like deja-vu but the pilot was able to get one wheel down and then the other and then it was done. But it was a pretty rough ride. I was watching other planes land from the PC and it was the same thing for almost all of the other planes. Apparently, Jetblue cancelled some of their flights that day from DCA.
atiger29 is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2011 | 10:26 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Washington, D.C. Metro
Programs: AA EXP | UA Million Miler Gold (former decade-long 1K) | SPG Plat | Hyatt Plat | Avis Chairman
Posts: 822
Originally Posted by atiger29
Landing at DCA on a RJ was quite a ride yesterday (02/19.)...
The winds here in DC yesterday were unreal! My friend and I were talking about what impact this would have on flights. I said probably little... but I hadn't thought about the RJs bouncing around in the breeze! Thanks for a real 'riders' perspective, atiger29!
UAfan is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2011 | 11:15 am
  #29  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: JFK/EWR/LGA
Programs: A shadow of my former self
Posts: 940
It's a global phenomenon. Thai's ultra-longhaul LAX-BKK flight has taken 18 hours in the air recently. It was 15 hours in August.

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/THA795/history

David
IndyDavid is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2011 | 12:40 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,660
Originally Posted by mduell
Note CO uses slower B73x equipment on many of their flights, while UA is all B752, which makes CO even more optimistic
I'm afraid you know not what you speak.
doobierw is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.