FlyerTalk Forums
1  2  3  4  5  6 
Page 1 of 6
Go to

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger-488/)
-   -   Thoughts on Livery (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger/1080508-thoughts-livery.html)

JetSet78 May 1, 2010 6:00 pm

Thoughts on Livery
 
Yes, another merger thread - apologies in advance. :)

With a reported impending merger and the extinguishing of one respectable brand, I think it would be a nice tribute to CO by placing the globe logo on UA tails.

Basically, use the same color scheme on the current aircraft with the same palette, replace the U/A tail with a globe.

Thoughts?

transportbiz May 1, 2010 6:03 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetSet78 (Post 13880412)
Yes, another merger thread - apologies in advance. :)

With a reported impending merger and the extinguishing of one respectable brand, I think it would be a nice tribute to CO by placing the globe logo on UA tails.

Basically, use the same color scheme on the current aircraft with the same palette, replace the U/A tail with a globe.

Thoughts?

This was just discussed in this thread: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/conti...y-right-2.html

JetSet78 May 1, 2010 6:16 pm

Whoops, and I thought I had read them all. Mods, please merge if possible.

cova May 1, 2010 6:37 pm

This is a special topic and it desires targeted discussion. The referenced thread is too general. If we have very specific titles and do not get too OT, then I think multiple targeted threads is good.

Then you read what is in your interest. Just my opinion.

JetSet78 May 1, 2010 6:38 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by cova (Post 13880551)
This is a special topic and it desires targeted discussion. The referenced thread is too general. If we have very specific titles and do not get too OT, then I think multiple targeted threads is good.

Then you read what is in your interest. Just my opinion.

I tend to agree. The wording on the initial thread refers to slogan, not necessary livery.

cova May 1, 2010 7:24 pm

My thought is that they will just go with UA's current new livery. UA has about 3 that are currently flying.

BearX220 May 1, 2010 9:22 pm

I would love to see a post-merger hybrid livery that acknowledges the CO lineage, but I expect this merger will do to CO's brand what the DL-NW deal did to the NW brand... e.g., crush it like a bug and sweep it into history's dustbin. The resulting airline will look, feel and stink like United Airlines.

TWA Fan 1 May 1, 2010 9:30 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BearX220 (Post 13881106)
I would love to see a post-merger hybrid livery that acknowledges the CO lineage, but I expect this merger will do to CO's brand what the DL-NW deal did to the NW brand... e.g., crush it like a bug and sweep it into history's dustbin. The resulting airline will look, feel and stink like United Airlines.

What do you mean by "stink?"

HobokenFlyer May 1, 2010 9:31 pm

Can we change the name of the combined company to Varney Speed Lines...like the sound of that! :D

bentruler May 1, 2010 9:37 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by cova (Post 13880718)
My thought is that they will just go with UA's current new livery. UA has about 3 that are currently flying.

They'll just have 4. At the rate UA paints planes I'll retire before they get rid of all the CO ones.

TWA Fan 1 May 1, 2010 9:41 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by cova (Post 13880718)
My thought is that they will just go with UA's current new livery. UA has about 3 that are currently flying.

Actually, most of the planes have been painted the current livery.

Some planes still have the previous battleship gray livery.

There are no UA planes flying with the livery previous to that, which was the tricolor cheatline livery:

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-ph.../1/0753153.jpg

TWA Fan 1 May 1, 2010 9:43 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by HobokenFlyer (Post 13881138)
Can we change the name of the combined company to Varney Speed Lines...like the sound of that! :D

Very a propos.

Varney's two babies reunited (no pun intended) after 85 years...

GetSetJetSet May 2, 2010 9:35 am

if we must go united I vote for 80's retro.

Pahdz May 2, 2010 10:27 am

Quote:

Originally Posted by TWA Fan 1 (Post 13881164)
Actually, most of the planes have been painted the current livery.

Some planes still have the previous battleship gray livery.

There are no UA planes flying with the livery previous to that, which was the tricolor cheatline livery:

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-ph.../1/0753153.jpg

it sure doesn't seem like it

no matter what you think of US, i think they did a very good job with their new livery when they combined with HP

transportbiz May 2, 2010 11:45 am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bentruler (Post 13881157)
They'll just have 4. At the rate UA paints planes I'll retire before they get rid of all the CO ones.

Airlines paint planes all at the same rate of renewal. It has to do with the inspection process. Every _____ years the plane must be stripped to it's bare metal, inspected and is then repainted. Or at least this is what a seat mate who sells paint stripper to the airlines (seriously that was his job) told me. With a merger I personally think it's wasteful (environmentally, and bottom line cost) to rush this before it's needed as part of the inspection process. DL was very eager to paint the NWA 747's in its livery (though the inspection may have been do soon anyways).


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:18 pm.
1  2  3  4  5  6 
Page 1 of 6
Go to


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.