![]() |
well - as of April 29 - it's RAT only for all. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/...rs-2023-04-25/
|
Originally Posted by Palal
(Post 35199731)
well - as of April 29 - it's RAT only for all. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/...rs-2023-04-25/
technically airlines don’t even check this. after 956 days, COVID is finally over in China |
Originally Posted by kb1992
(Post 35199754)
technically airlines don’t even check this.
毛宁介绍,自4月29日起,所有来华人员可以登机前48小时内抗原检测代替核酸检测,航空公司不再查验登机前检测证明。 |
Originally Posted by tailorgiven
(Post 35200321)
According to this affiliated news site, COVID results aren’t even “technically” required anymore. Finally.
|
They also did some testing on arrival in Daxing but they seemed to only select Chinese citizens for this and they kept foreigners out of it.
|
Originally Posted by llb09
(Post 35200985)
Flew on Qatar to Beijing a few days ago and they would not let me board without a negative test result, even when I explained this was not required any longer. However they did not check the entry health QR code.
Originally Posted by llb09
(Post 35200994)
They also did some testing on arrival in Daxing but they seemed to only select Chinese citizens for this and they kept foreigners out of it.
|
Originally Posted by llb09
(Post 35200985)
Flew on Qatar to Beijing a few days ago and they would not let me board without a negative test result, even when I explained this was not required any longer. However they did not check the entry health QR code.
Why would you not need a neg. test? It is very much still required from many countries, until the 29th. |
Originally Posted by Palal
(Post 35199731)
well - as of April 29 - it's RAT only for all. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/...rs-2023-04-25/
|
Originally Posted by llb09
(Post 35200985)
Flew on Qatar to Beijing a few days ago and they would not let me board without a negative test result, even when I explained this was not required any longer. However they did not check the entry health QR code.
|
Some news sites report that flyers still need to show a Antigen test taken 48hr before flying post 29th Apr. Can this be at private at home test that you take a photo of the result of a commercially purchased and verified test?
thanks |
Originally Posted by QTFLYER
(Post 35204012)
Some news sites report that flyers still need to show a Antigen test taken 48hr before flying post 29th Apr. Can this be at private at home test that you take a photo of the result of a commercially purchased and verified test?
thanks That is what's required, yes; a RAT test that you can take yourself with photo proof; HOWEVER, it's inconceivable that any airline would be required to check this, as there's really nothing to check anymore, and the requirement has been lifted for the airlines to be made accountable should a passenger be found to have lied on their health declaration. In summary: any RAT test is okay, airlines won't check. |
The RAT test is still legally required. You have to declare the test result to be negative on the Customs declaration. Providing false information to Customs may lead to fines and/or imprisonment.
Of course the actual result will no longer be checked by the airline. So it's up to you to determine whether you are happy to wear the legal risk of not doing a test at all. |
I am failing to see a legal risk. Even if you do the self-test (and test negative), there is always a good chance to catch covid while being on your way to China (or you catched it just prior to the test, so it wouldn't show yet) - how would they make a difference between "tested negative, but later been positive when arriving" and "didn't test, just declared negative and tested positive when arriving"
Basically, Covid is over, and what's currently done is "for show". |
Originally Posted by YuropFlyer
(Post 35205361)
I am failing to see a legal risk. Even if you do the self-test (and test negative), there is always a good chance to catch covid while being on your way to China (or you catched it just prior to the test, so it wouldn't show yet) - how would they make a difference between "tested negative, but later been positive when arriving" and "didn't test, just declared negative and tested positive when arriving".
Not sure about mainland requirements, but in HK you had to self-administer a RAT and keep the picture for 90 days. Failing to produce the picture was punishable, not catching covid on arrival. |
Originally Posted by YuropFlyer
(Post 35205361)
I am failing to see a legal risk. Even if you do the self-test (and test negative), there is always a good chance to catch covid while being on your way to China (or you catched it just prior to the test, so it wouldn't show yet) - how would they make a difference between "tested negative, but later been positive when arriving" and "didn't test, just declared negative and tested positive when arriving"
Basically, Covid is over, and what's currently done is "for show". The negative test result should presumably provide you with significant legal cover if you happen to catch Covid after your test (on the way to China or later). |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.