Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Gate searches -- still?!? AAARRRHHHGGG!! (merged)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Gate searches -- still?!? AAARRRHHHGGG!! (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2018, 7:27 am
  #1741  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,620
At the gate in MCO, four TSA employees setup an impromptu screening area and had the gate agent make an announcement and I am quoting here "passengers with paper boarding passes and ONLY paper boarding passes to have them out along with ID for inspection by the TSA".

She said that those with mobile boarding passes do not have to do anything and that the TSA was only screening those with paper boarding passes.

I did not effect me as I was using a mobile boarding pass, but for the life of me I could not understand why those with paper boarding passes were/are more of a risk than those with mobile boarding passes (at least in the TSA's eyes).

A few folks quickly obtained mobile boarding passes at the gate area, the older lady sitting next to me loudly asked her husband how to install the DELTA app so that she could obtain a mobile boarding pass as she did not want to deal with the TSA again.
Xyzzy, bdschobel and jfunk138 like this.
kmersh is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2018, 8:55 am
  #1742  
pvn
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MEM
Programs: Starbucks Green Card
Posts: 5,431
Originally Posted by kmersh
I did not effect me as I was using a mobile boarding pass, but for the life of me I could not understand why those with paper boarding passes were/are more of a risk than those with mobile boarding passes (at least in the TSA's eyes).
Wait, what makes you think that these people were more of a risk in their eyes?
pvn is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2018, 12:02 pm
  #1743  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,620
Originally Posted by pvn
Wait, what makes you think that these people were more of a risk in their eyes?
Nothing, but generally the TSA sees everyone as a risk and in my mind that would extend to a gate search and specifically only checking paper boarding passes.

I think the entire exercise was a waste, but as my wife always tells me, nobody is asking me.
kmersh is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2018, 12:52 pm
  #1744  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Originally Posted by pvn
Wait, what makes you think that these people were more of a risk in their eyes?
Originally Posted by kmersh
Nothing, but generally the TSA sees everyone as a risk and in my mind that would extend to a gate search and specifically only checking paper boarding passes.

I think the entire exercise was a waste, but as my wife always tells me, nobody is asking me.
I doubt that TSA sees paper boarding pass users as more risky than mobile BP users - though if asked I have no doubt that they'd come up with some typical Newspeak double-talk garbage to justify it - I just think the TSOs used the distinction as an arbitrary way to weed out most of the experienced business travelers who are more likely to give pushback than the average leisure traveler who submits more meekly out of terrorphobia.
WillCAD is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2018, 12:58 pm
  #1745  
pvn
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MEM
Programs: Starbucks Green Card
Posts: 5,431
Originally Posted by WillCAD
I doubt that TSA sees paper boarding pass users as more risky than mobile BP users - though if asked I have no doubt that they'd come up with some typical Newspeak double-talk garbage to justify it - I just think the TSOs used the distinction as an arbitrary way to weed out most of the experienced business travelers who are more likely to give pushback than the average leisure traveler who submits more meekly out of terrorphobia.
this is almost certainly correct, or very nearly so. Obviously if people had enough warning to download the app to avoid the additional search, the intention wasn't to actually find anything. This was 100% security theater.
Spiff likes this.
pvn is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2018, 1:46 pm
  #1746  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by pvn
Wait, what makes you think that these people were more of a risk in their eyes?
Very little of what TSA is about risk mitigation. Culling those with paper boarding passes would allow them to see if the TSA document checker was making their secret mark on paper boarding passes, or perhaps seeing how many had been reprinted once past security. Bottom line if TSA can't conduct a proper screening at the primary checkpoint then what's the purpose of the security check in the first place.
Spiff likes this.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2018, 3:51 pm
  #1747  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 580
The one reason that I could see them only looking at paper boarding passes is that perhaps they wanted to find people with SSSS on their boarding pass. People with SSSS are generally unable to get mobile boarding passes.

However, even this seems flawed as there does not seem to be anything that prevented people with paper boarding passes from just pretending that they had mobile boarding passes to avoid being checked.
guflyer is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2018, 12:02 am
  #1748  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Passengers on TSA-covered flights with ticket coupon’s departure city marked with O were widely inhibited from having a mobile boarding pass for that TSA-covered flight when subject to haraSSSSment selection. Paper boarding passes — even self-printed ones, eventually — weren’t.

Has anyone seen a US carrier mobile phone — non-PDF/non-photo of paper/PDF — boarding pass with SSSS for the initial flight ticket coupon’s boarding pass?

Last edited by GUWonder; Jul 6, 2018 at 12:10 am
GUWonder is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2018, 7:24 pm
  #1749  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Ex Platinum & 1MM, DL PLT, Marriott Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 2,490
7 of them checking BPs and IDs today, LAX-DTW which I believe is an RJ.
txrus is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2019, 5:54 am
  #1750  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
Waiting to board my UA MCI-DEN and the contract workers here at MCI just wandered over and told the GA “not our choice” as they began to setup a secondary station in the second boarding lane. GA announced it was 100% ID checks and it appears they’ve got an ETD out as well. Haven’t seen one of these stations in quite a while, especially here at an airport where the checkpoint is 100 feet from the gate...
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2019, 8:02 am
  #1751  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
Waiting to board my UA MCI-DEN and the contract workers here at MCI just wandered over and told the GA “not our choice” as they began to setup a secondary station in the second boarding lane. GA announced it was 100% ID checks and it appears they’ve got an ETD out as well. Haven’t seen one of these stations in quite a while, especially here at an airport where the checkpoint is 100 feet from the gate...
Not convinced that these gate screenings accomplish any real security objective other than proving that TSA's passenger screening is ineffective as long as airport workers remain unscreened.
Spiff and Xyzzy like this.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2019, 2:02 pm
  #1752  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Not convinced that these gate screenings accomplish any real security objective other than proving that TSA's passenger screening is ineffective as long as airport workers remain unscreened.
I wonder if they ever 'random' flight crew at the gate?

A while back an FA got 'randomed'. Can't remember the airports, but it made the news because she ran off. Yes, ran away. Her rollaboard was filled with drugs. They did eventually catch up to her a few days later.

I didn't follow the case, so I don't know if they looked into whether or not this was her first run. If she hadn't been 'randomed', she would have boarded and flown with a suitcase full of hard drugs. If TSA were doing random gate checks, would they have checked her bag?

I seriously doubt it. I have never seen crew stopped during TSA gate checks, and generally first class boards unchallenged.
chollie is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2019, 2:37 pm
  #1753  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by chollie
I wonder if they ever 'random' flight crew at the gate?

A while back an FA got 'randomed'. Can't remember the airports, but it made the news because she ran off. Yes, ran away. Her rollaboard was filled with drugs. They did eventually catch up to her a few days later.

I didn't follow the case, so I don't know if they looked into whether or not this was her first run. If she hadn't been 'randomed', she would have boarded and flown with a suitcase full of hard drugs. If TSA were doing random gate checks, would they have checked her bag?

I seriously doubt it. I have never seen crew stopped during TSA gate checks, and generally first class boards unchallenged.
Usually the crew has already boarded the aircraft before a gate check commences.

I don't condone illegal drug use or trafficking but think the last thing TSA should be doing is getting involved in any law enforcement activities, during a gate check or any other time and place. It's not their job and we have plenty of other resources to engage in those activities.
Spiff and bdschobel like this.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2019, 3:34 pm
  #1754  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Usually the crew has already boarded the aircraft before a gate check commences.

I don't condone illegal drug use or trafficking but think the last thing TSA should be doing is getting involved in any law enforcement activities, during a gate check or any other time and place. It's not their job and we have plenty of other resources to engage in those activities.
That's not my point.

She could have had a gun in her bag. She could have had explosives. She happened to have drugs. She was caught by a 'random' checkpoint inspection. Ordinarily her bag never passes through an x-ray.

If ordinary travelers who have passed the checkpoint are still subject to 'random' gate checks, even those with Precheck, then shouldn't flight crew (at least the cabin crew) also be subjected to infrequent random checks?
chollie is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2019, 4:24 pm
  #1755  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by chollie
That's not my point.

She could have had a gun in her bag. She could have had explosives. She happened to have drugs. She was caught by a 'random' checkpoint inspection. Ordinarily her bag never passes through an x-ray.

If ordinary travelers who have passed the checkpoint are still subject to 'random' gate checks, even those with Precheck, then shouldn't flight crew (at least the cabin crew) also be subjected to infrequent random checks?
I agree with you to a point but I do not agree that there should be gate checks. Every person entering the secure area of an airport should be screened, passenger and employee alike. Then there is no need for gate checks or random searches. There is zero security when a group of people are exempted from routine screening.
Spiff, aidy, petaluma1 and 2 others like this.

Last edited by Boggie Dog; Jan 29, 2019 at 6:03 pm
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.