FYI at DEN
#106
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,725
What specific purpose does checking the presented ID against the boarding pass serve? It certainly makes the sheeple feel safe, but it does nothing to actually make them safe. Making people safe is accomplished by searching for credible weapons. That part of the TSA's task has been proven sorely lacking in effectiveness. Making them search for and confiscate water, toothpaste, etc. and waste time checking IDs only increases their distraction.
#107




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
So, comrade, I submit that these ID check do indeed serve a purpose in that they concentrate and build power in the Federal government.
#108
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,674
I would posit that, like the boiling frog, that checking ID conditions the populace to be submissive to the government and accepting of endless government intrusions on our lives. Once we get used to this, there will be more and more restrictions, impediments, and hurdles to our ability to exercise those freedoms that make us Americans. To the point that the freedoms no longer exist.
So, comrade, I submit that these ID check do indeed serve a purpose in that they concentrate and build power in the Federal government.
So, comrade, I submit that these ID check do indeed serve a purpose in that they concentrate and build power in the Federal government.

#109
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,127
As a previous poster noted, it was not too long ago that it was allowed and at that time, pick pockets ran the trains at DEN and made a lot of people miserable.
Here's mine: At what place are we drawing the line on legitimate airside purposes? Apparently liquids from landside in containers over 100 ml is dangerous, along with "too many" non-flying people hanging about shops and gates, and -- under the scenario above -- the carrying of personal wallets.
Last edited by essxjay; Oct 2, 2007 at 1:12 pm
#110
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,691
This is going no where if you are going to be impossible. I mean you are putting "farting" on the same level as theft!!! I'd rather have someone fart in my face than steal my hard earned money as would you. If you say otherwise, you are a dirty lair. You are doing it because he has a valid point and that is the best you have. Come back to this conversation when you can quit being so ridiculous.
#111




Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
#112
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: AA EXP, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,017
This is going no where if you are going to be impossible. I mean you are putting "farting" on the same level as theft!!! I'd rather have someone fart in my face than steal my hard earned money as would you. If you say otherwise, you are a dirty lair. You are doing it because he has a valid point and that is the best you have. Come back to this conversation when you can quit being so ridiculous.
I do have a question for you though. Since when was theft one of the reasons that airport security stopped allowing non-flyers through security?
Honestly, I think the mere mention of theft is a big, red herring in this discussion having to do with TSA security at airports which we all know has to do with terrorism.
#113
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,127
This is going no where if you are going to be impossible. I mean you are putting "farting" on the same level as theft!!! I'd rather have someone fart in my face than steal my hard earned money as would you. If you say otherwise, you are a dirty lair. You are doing it because he has a valid point and that is the best you have. Come back to this conversation when you can quit being so ridiculous.
I do have a question for you though. Since when was theft one of the reasons that airport security stopped allowing non-flyers through security?
Honestly, I think the mere mention of theft is a big, red herring in this discussion having to do with TSA security at airports which we all know has to do with terrorism.
Speaking of discussion, I would appreciate it, United737522, if you'd edit your personal attack on me. Calling someone a dirty liar is TOS violation. But since I'm party to this discussion with you, I'll have to recuse myself from moderating it now.
#115
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,127
#116


Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate NY or FL or inbetween
Programs: US former CP Looking for a new airline to love me
Posts: 1,694
A nice read:
7 December 1987; Pacific Southwest Airlines BAe146-200; near San Luis Obispo, CA: A recently fired USAir employee used his invalidated credentials to board the aircraft with a pistol and apparently killed his former manager and both pilots (USAir had recently purchased PSA). All five crew members and the 37 other passengers were killed.
So, by examining credentials closer, we can maybe keep the people who use expired IDs and such off planes. Tough to argue this one...
7 December 1987; Pacific Southwest Airlines BAe146-200; near San Luis Obispo, CA: A recently fired USAir employee used his invalidated credentials to board the aircraft with a pistol and apparently killed his former manager and both pilots (USAir had recently purchased PSA). All five crew members and the 37 other passengers were killed.
So, by examining credentials closer, we can maybe keep the people who use expired IDs and such off planes. Tough to argue this one...
Now that's tough to argue! The cause of this tragedy was so obviously a weapon in the hands of someone determined to settle a score. How you bring expired ID's into the equation, other than it being a tangential quote from wherever you got this, is lost on me. Apparently you haven't been paying attention as the MCO rampers just recently smuggled multiple handguns and an M-16 onto a Comair flight to SJU. Get your head out from wherever you stuck it, and take an objective look at the lay-out of the typical airport. Access to the "sterile" area is easily available to a huge variety of airline and serice personnel via a card swipe and a code entry, if that. Weapon through there? Easy, as so often proven. ID expired or not? Total red herring.
ID verification <> improved security !!!
#117
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern California
Programs: DL: 3.8 MM, Marriott: Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 24,575
Let's back this thread down to a dull roar, folks, and keep it on topic.
LessO2 started the thread reporting on TSA ID checks that have been started in DEN.
Since then the thread has wandered all over the map. And tempers have been short as they are wont to do on some TS/S threads.
Please stay on topic and respect your fellow FT'ers.
Thanks.
__________________________
Cholula
Travel Safety/Security Forum Moderator
LessO2 started the thread reporting on TSA ID checks that have been started in DEN.
Since then the thread has wandered all over the map. And tempers have been short as they are wont to do on some TS/S threads.
Please stay on topic and respect your fellow FT'ers.
Thanks.
__________________________
Cholula
Travel Safety/Security Forum Moderator
#120
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M




Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133

