Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Was escorted off flight for complaining about 1 hour delay

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Was escorted off flight for complaining about 1 hour delay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:17 pm
  #46  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SJC
Posts: 5,694
Meanwhile:

http://www.northcountrygazette.org/a...earingMan.html

Originally Posted by North County Gazette
DETROIT, MICH---A federal appeals court has ruled that a police officer who arrested a man for using a profanity at a public meeting violated the man's right to free speech under the First Amendment.

Last edited by Cholula; Sep 11, 2007 at 3:03 pm Reason: Removed reference to another FT'er
JakiChan is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:22 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 574
Originally Posted by sbrower
There are a few things that make us different from other countries. Some of the most fundamental principles are those contained in the Constitution (including the amendments thereto). For anyone to imply that First Amendment rights should be limited or dismissed or treated as trivial is, in my view, arguably anti-American. I don't know of any country in the world, with or without a First Amendment, where you can't say "Pardon me, but if it would not be too much of a bother, would you kindly let me know where the privy is located?" However, I know of only one country where the highest court in the country has taken the time to say that you can enter a courthouse wearing a shirt saying "F..k the Draft" because that is an expression of sentiment, not an obscene use of language.
You misunderstand the First Amendment. You have a fundamental right to express your opinion. However, if 99% of the world calls you a jerk because of your expression of your right, you don't have a complaint as they are also expressing their fundamental right. There is no First amendment right to say what one wants to say without being called names or otherwise being criticized for what was said.
ORDflyer is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:26 pm
  #48  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SJC
Posts: 5,694
Originally Posted by ORDflyer
There is no First amendment right to say what one wants to say without being called names or otherwise being criticized for what was said.
Exactly - so many people miss this part.

The First Amendment gives you a right to be an a-hole. It also gives me the right to call you an a-hole.

On a mailing list I run this comes up often. People complain when criticized for saying something stupid. They complain that they can say what they want - and they can. But folks get to say what they want in response.

So if one of the other passengers had told the OP to shut the F up then that would have been totally cool. The FA could have said it as well and while it's against policy it wouldn't have been illegal.
JakiChan is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:29 pm
  #49  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
Roth vs. United States of America.
While not conceding that the OP's incident raises any First Amendment issues, I think that perhaps COHEN v. CALIFORNIA, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), is a more appropriate case.

After all, Cohen actually decided the criminality of the same word uttered by the OP. The issue in Roth was an obscenity conviction for having mailed dirty pictures.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:31 pm
  #50  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by Mikey likes it
It's about the abuse of the exercise of the right. Particularly when the abuse (here, swearing at or around the FA) serves no constructive purpose.
There is no inherent right to swear on an aircraft. It's not the particular incident, but the idea that one can "abuse" a fundamental right that I find odd.
PTravel is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:33 pm
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
Originally Posted by ORDflyer
You misunderstand the First Amendment. You have a fundamental right to express your opinion. However, if 99% of the world calls you a jerk because of your expression of your right, you don't have a complaint as they are also expressing their fundamental right. There is no First amendment right to say what one wants to say without being called names or otherwise being criticized for what was said.
The problem is the FA didn't express an opinion. She enlisted the authority of the state to act against the person. THAT is the offense. Lacking the FAs side of the story, if the only complaint was that he swore, the FAs actions in calling police and calling it a security threat was WAY out of line.
flyinbob is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:33 pm
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
Roth vs. United States of America.Mr. Justice Brennan.
Roth is an obscenity case. Profanity is not the same thing as obscenity. Using the "F" word is not obscenity per se. See Cohen v. California.
PTravel is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:34 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K, Starwood/Marriott Plat, Others of little note
Posts: 1,148
Originally Posted by sonofzeus
Amazing but true. I saw a "No @#!" sign on the Va Beach Boardwalk on 9/2/07. Hampton Roads area is very appealing but for its extreme Redness.
Not only in the voting patterns, but also in the necks.
jedison is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:34 pm
  #54  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by PTravel
There is no inherent right to swear on an aircraft. It's not the particular incident, but the idea that one can "abuse" a fundamental right that I find odd.
You're right - in fact, there's no inherent right to even speak at all on an aircraft. Airlines are free to require that passengers be silent for the duration of the flight.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 2:35 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K, Starwood/Marriott Plat, Others of little note
Posts: 1,148
Originally Posted by JakiChan
Exactly - so many people miss this part.

The First Amendment gives you a right to be an a-hole. It also gives me the right to call you an a-hole.

On a mailing list I run this comes up often. People complain when criticized for saying something stupid. They complain that they can say what they want - and they can. But folks get to say what they want in response.

So if one of the other passengers had told the OP to shut the F up then that would have been totally cool. The FA could have said it as well and while it's against policy it wouldn't have been illegal.
It is important to note, however, that a state actor (such as a police officer) cannot tell you to shut up.
jedison is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 3:59 pm
  #56  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Pet Peeve

Originally Posted by APW Girl
I see the point regarding the push, push..hurry up, but don't forget all the people who are still holding up security lines with liquids and all the other things they shouldn't have (as if they have been in a coma the , the last 5 years and don't know better),,or those who wait till the last minute and now think they should jump the line. The sooner you get settled in your seat, the sooner we all take off.
My pet peeve: assuming that others know the same things you know. They don't; get used to it.
doober is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 4:07 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX/NYC
Programs: AAdvantage EXP (5.8MM Airpass) Delta Gold Medallion Marriott Platinum
Posts: 1,330
If you are posting here, you know airport delays are a fact of life. The fact that you cursed in a public setting makes you deserving of whatever you got from the police. Frankly, if I had been there, I would have asked you to be quiet.

I applaud the FA and hope you are banned from future AA flights. You can bet there is a record in your file.
AA53 is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 4:12 pm
  #58  
nrr
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: jfk area
Programs: AA platinum; 2MM AA, Delta Diamond, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,291
I wasn't there, of course, to hear how he said his "obscentity". But some words, have become part of "normal" speech. Stand on a street corner in any major city, and listen to how many "obscene" words you hear--you would think that everyone is using them.
Assuming that the op really only used f*ck in a non offensive way, the fa blew the situation out of proportion, IMHO.
[PS: There is a clothing company, I think, whose name is ....; would a company, just a few years ago, every have taken a name like that?--the times are a changin!]
nrr is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 4:28 pm
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
Originally Posted by FWAAA
You're right - in fact, there's no inherent right to even speak at all on an aircraft. Airlines are free to require that passengers be silent for the duration of the flight.
Ooh, what airline is that? I always get "the talker" next to me. "I'm sorry, sir, I'd love to hear about your colon operation, but this is the non-talking section."

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 4:32 pm
  #60  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, SkyMiles
Posts: 4,339
Originally Posted by AA53
If you are posting here, you know airport delays are a fact of life. The fact that you cursed in a public setting makes you deserving of whatever you got from the police. Frankly, if I had been there, I would have asked you to be quiet.

I applaud the FA and hope you are banned from future AA flights. You can bet there is a record in your file.
Hey, back off. Be nice. You have a right to your opinion, but telling her she should be banned from further flights is out of line.

Wow, I feel bad for you! I'll admit that you made a mistake by swearing, BUT we're all human. The flight attendant shouldn't have gone over the line and called the police on you just because of that. She should have agreed with you, or at the very most, given you a warning -- but bringing police into it? C'mon.

At least you didn't get arrested or anything... and wow I didn't realize swearing in VA is a misdeamor! Meaning if I'm talking with my friends and drop the F-bomb, I'm doing a misdeamor?

I laughed out aloud when I read the "starting a riot" part. You have a right to complain to the gate agent -- you paid for the flight, you're their customer, and the customer comes first.

Sorry you had to go through this ordeal.

Andrew
MrAndy1369 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.