Just click on the arrow next to Eyecue's name of what I quoted and it should automatically take you there.

I never said the determining factor was cost of disposal. IF it was, it would make it too expensive to fly. You are wrong about the binary thing too.

Please elaborate why...and just saying "that's secret", doesn't change my mind.

The key to what you say is that you learned that there arent many of these, but there are some. It is the people on this board that keep saying that TSA should treat them as a haz mat if they are going to not allow them on the airplane. To this I say that it is not practical and not required by law.

. Congratulations on all your training. I have had the same as you have for the same reasons that you have. You arent likely to have that response to a class 3 and a class 8 when the amounts that dont have to be marked are less than 30L and 60L respective to the substance that I am talking about.

.I understand that you feel that this is worthless, I stated that I doubt the process myself, in fact I said that someone in high places must be watching too much Jame Bond. The fact is that if TSA is checking liquids like they are supposed to be then the substances would not get through. Could you think for a minute that an inhaler has a pretty common x-ray signature and the operator knows what it is?

ALL right all the experts on this issue weighed in on TATP and HMTD Those are the two that are mentioned the most by the drive by media! I concur that these two explosives cannot be assembled by the person that wants to take them on the plane at the time that the person is the in airport. Plus they are not a true liquid binary, they are a chrystaline precipitate. So as far as those two are concerned, it cannot happen. The one that we went out into the tooley bushes and blew a plane fuselage, overheads and seats to pieces with was not either of these.

Hang on a sec here. Maybe we're dipping into semantics, but why does SAT TSA go through all the HAZMAT trouble, whereas DEN treats it like a waffle cone?

Seriously, and I'm not trying to pick on you or anyone other TSAer, but it either goes "kaboom" or it doesn't. You know as well as anyone that manpower and resources are dwindling everywhere with the TSA. So why does other TSA outlets go through the time and resources to train folks to handle this?

So you are asking us to take on faith that you have a credible binary explosive? I don't believe you.

And, no offense, it's "Tule" not tooley, and crystaline, not chrystaline.

He is talking about lighters and lighter fluid and self defense sprays, bleach, starch, etc. Not the general liquids that are not allowed. WE do the same at DEN.

And how can you be assured that the 20 oz. bottle that is labeled "water" is, in fact, not bleach and therefore should be treated as hazmat?

They treat it at face value.

But wait, that means they only do that selectively. It's Aquafina when they say it is, and it's not when they say it isn't even though the label says it is.

Surely the Fire Marshal should be summoned!!

...and isn't that a rather damaging signature for a poster on an Internet BBS that is available to millions of people around the world? Seems like it would be grounds for dismissal for any actual Federal employee. . .

The is the point that I have been trying to make. 20 OZ is not a quantity that needs to be dealt with as a haz mat regardless of what it is. (class 1 excluded)

That is your choice whether or not to believe me. I think that when you start to pick apart things like this, you are grasping for things. You got the point that I was making.

ARe you saying that I am not who I say that I am? IF that is the case, use PM to send me your email and I will email you out of my work account.