I have no issue with this possibility being highlighted. I do take issue with the idea that checking ID against boarding passes -- even if tightly controlled -- is a worthwhile security measure. The only real security it provides is financial security for the airlines (and their revenue protection-type units), for those employed in the dog and pony security show( including ID checkers), and vendors involved in selling ID-checking systems, personal information and databases.

Good luck, and welcome to more active contributions to Flyertalk. :)

LOL Feel safer children?

I like the 99 part.. but I think it should be "B" not "F" :p

I wouldn't know about these types of things, but I understand that it is not particularly difficult to $hit on the american aviation security system and fly using an alias.

Feel safer children?

I don't get it. Why didn't you SSSS the old git?

In the middle-seat way past the FAM(s) in business/first? :D

As long as:

it's a coach seat
it's a middle seat
there's a backed up but out of service toilet nearby and
the flight attendants ignore him all flight

then I am satisfied. :)

I think a boarding pass is a wrong choice in that case... what you need is a
shipping label. :D

Destination: North Korea? :eek: :D

To:

Lovers of Dear Leader
666 Idi-ot Palace Way
Pyongyang, North Korea

TO: Democratic People's Republic of Korea

or

TO: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

or

TO: Gulag 52, Siberia, Russia.

Handle WITHOUT Care ;)

Great minds think alike! :)

and "THIS SIDE UP" near the feet.

What would North Korea do to the boarding pass engine creator? Send their version of "the men" to "have a talk"? :eek:

Don't love it too much. Take a look at their "fix" in post #2.