Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SSSS and Security Clearance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 8:31 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by Bart
But here's the irony: x-raying a bag that contains classified information doesn't compromise the information at all. Whether that classified information is on software, hardware, paper or any other medium, we cannot read the contents of that information. All we "see" is the medium itself. In other words, we will see a series of orange rectangles that shape a document, for example, but won't be able to read the contents. In fact, the only items we can read are metallic letters or highly contrasted items such as military uniform name plates...and that's if the item happens to be at a flat angle.

I don't attempt to explain this anymore. There is a procedure that allows classified couriers to exempt only the classified item and its container (e.g. envelope, hard drive case, etc.) but not the bag unless it's something like a locked briefcase handcuffed to the courier (don't know if we do that anymore...thought that went out with the end of the Cold War, but it's been a few years since I was in the Army). Couriers insist that their items not be x-ray inspected and we comply even though it's a silly fear.
I don't doubt that x-rays won't show the letters and that whatever is in the pouch wouldn't be compromised by that. But as I know you know, it still has to leave the courier's control to do that and that's a big no-no.

Couriers might insist, but I don't think it's out of fear of the x-ray on the courier's part. It's probably coming from a security regulation from the agency, or even US law. Also, I wouldn't want something to happen at the checkpoint, have the pouch damaged (ie a hard drive dropped, for example), then have that come back to haunt me. I just know how my luck would be.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 8:33 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by MSY-MSP
If you are traveling with documentation that is not lock and key documentaiton, then the process is fairly simple, you have all of the documents in a sealed envelope along with a cover sheet that verifies that the envelope cannot be opened. TSA simply bends the envelope, without opening it, to determine if any prohibitted items are in it. Of course this only occurs if the bag receives a secondary. The other thing is that you must verify that the bag enters the X-ray prior to walking through the WTMD and that it is not rerun. Our policy is that when placing the bag on the belt that we inform the TSO's that the bag cannot be rerun and should be hand searched if necessary in a private room.
Interesting and thanks.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 10:23 pm
  #18  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Programs: UA 1K, AA PLT, SPG PLT
Posts: 1,612
So it seems that my initial question has been answered. US (or even foreign) government clearances don't have any part of either picking or not being picked for an SSSS interrogation.

I guess it just worked out for me that in any situation and performing certain (last minute, first class fares) transactions won't ever signal me for an SSSS.

So, the obvious next question: Does anyone have the process figured out on who is selected and how that determination comes in? If it really is purely up to the airline, are they mandated at all by any federal agency? Otherwise, what's to say that Airline A picks an allotment of 10% of passengers that pose no specific threat, while Airline B picks the same 10%, although all are suspected 'risky' passengers...and Airline A decided to pick its 10 based on non-FFs, non-high revenue, last minute purchases? Do the airlines get audited every so often?

-jeremy
kmfdm91 is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 1:04 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SIN
Programs: UA 1K, HHonors Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 16
Originally Posted by Bart
I've had people with prohibited items (scissors---when they were prohibited---knives, tools, etc) argue that they had a secret security clearance or even top secret clearance and that they shouldn't even have to undergo screening. I understand the logic of what they're saying but not the practicality of what they're saying. They are, of course, only looking at it from a purely selfish perspective of being inconvenienced without looking at the big picture of how TSA can safely by-pass screening for some people and not for others.
Not to continue an off-topic discussion, but I just would like to mention that someone with a security clearance should not WANT special treatment. Any kind of special treatment draws attention, and having a security clearance is something that you shouldn't draw attention to.

Let's face it, I think there are several threads on this board about how easy it often is to pick out a FAM.

The only safe way I can think of would be a trusted traveler type of program where maybe having a security clearance makes it easier to get accepted, since at least one government agency has done a background investigation already.
EGottlieb is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 8:06 am
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by EGottlieb
The only safe way I can think of would be a trusted traveler type of program where maybe having a security clearance makes it easier to get accepted, since at least one government agency has done a background investigation already.
In theory, yes. However, there's a big stink amongst contractors right now with different agencies not taking each other's poly's right now. Then when people go take their poly, they fail. So they can't work with one agency because they failed the poly, but they can continue to work with classified information with the other.

I know people in my company have had to deal with that.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 9:10 am
  #21  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Originally Posted by Superguy
I don't doubt that x-rays won't show the letters and that whatever is in the pouch wouldn't be compromised by that. But as I know you know, it still has to leave the courier's control to do that and that's a big no-no.

Couriers might insist, but I don't think it's out of fear of the x-ray on the courier's part. It's probably coming from a security regulation from the agency, or even US law. Also, I wouldn't want something to happen at the checkpoint, have the pouch damaged (ie a hard drive dropped, for example), then have that come back to haunt me. I just know how my luck would be.
Well, back to the risk management philosophy. If I personally place a bag inside the x-ray machine and pick it up at the other end, it's reasonable to assume the risk that no one is going to open it up and look at the contents (should be in a locked container with the documents themselves sealed in an envelope). Yes, theoretically a screener may have to search the bag; however, I put the onus for that on the courier. If you're stupid enough to pack a pocketknife in the same bag that contains classified information, then who's to blame? Point is that it is no secret that TSA screens bags, and it would be a matter of reducing the screening profile on a bag or briefcase as much as possible so that TSA would have no reason to open the container.

Then again, you bring up a great point about how some couriers treat classified information like the crown jewels and constantly clutch it, which also draws additional attention from security personnel. I don't think I've developed a cavalier attitude towards classified information in the many times I've handled it, but I didn't get wrapped around the axle with it neither. Suffice it to say, however, I suppose there were times when I technically violated certain security regulations due to operational contraints and circumstances. But I won't digress any further on that point.
Bart is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 8:20 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,931
Originally Posted by Bart
Here is my "problem" for those who have security clearances and think they are above the law: as a counterintelligence special agent, my caseload was devoted exclusively to those with security clearances who were suspected of a wide variety of crimes ranging from security violations to conducting espionage against the United States.
And of course there's the case of people who unwittingly are helping the other side. This could happen at the airport checkpoint, as well.
Doppy is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 9:31 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,015
Have to agree here. Try to remember: only TSA is above the law.
Lumpy is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 11:43 pm
  #24  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,610
I fortunately have not gotten a single SSSS since I started frequent flight (nearly 100 flights last year, 60 the previous year, several this year so far). I've held clearance for most of that time, but have never figured that had anything to do with it; the DoD (or other agency for those with, say, DoE clearances, etc.) is not going to share their DBs with the TSA. Not going to happen!!!

What I DO find funny about flying and holding clearance is that places like MCO that have the silly "pay us extortion and we won't play shoe carnival with you" program still run a background check on you when you sign up... a background check that is many orders of magnitude less thorough than the one you've already undergone.
exerda is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 3:13 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 18,080
Query: For those who get SSSS, do you always refuse to remove shoes at the checkpoint? Why bother, as you are going to be inconvenienced anyway.
Boraxo is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 5:20 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by Boraxo
Query: For those who get SSSS, do you always refuse to remove shoes at the checkpoint? Why bother, as you are going to be inconvenienced anyway.
So if we're going to get the full secondary anyway, why walk across a filthy, disgusting floor with no shoes? They can't threaten a full secondary, as you're already getting it, so why bother? I've never had to take my shoes off in a secondary anyway, even when the reason why I was sent there was because of shoes.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 5:21 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Arizona
Programs: *wood Gold, Marriott Gold, DL Silver, Hilton Silver, F9 Ascent
Posts: 2,419
Originally Posted by Superguy
I don't doubt that x-rays won't show the letters and that whatever is in the pouch wouldn't be compromised by that. But as I know you know, it still has to leave the courier's control to do that and that's a big no-no.

Couriers might insist, but I don't think it's out of fear of the x-ray on the courier's part. It's probably coming from a security regulation from the agency, or even US law. Also, I wouldn't want something to happen at the checkpoint, have the pouch damaged (ie a hard drive dropped, for example), then have that come back to haunt me. I just know how my luck would be.
^ Same here, I've had a black cloud following me hmmm since I got married

Our CSPSO has been watching too many Mission Impossible movies. When I got read on to another program recently she went over the courier rules for the agency involved. There was the usual stuff, take the most direct route to the airport, park at the terminal (SWEET! don't have to park in Siberia and take the bus), no alcohol etc. But now we can't have the package x-rayed!?!? Huh? As Bart and others have said, documents being x-rayed can't be read so what's the big deal? Well, she said there's two reasons: details of some of the items *can* be ascertained using the x-ray scanners and she along wih the governing agency are (overly)worried about scanner malfunctions or a possible (Mission Impossible-style) switcheroo while the package is out of our hands.

You know, I can understand the first concern because of the type of stuff we do but c'mon, Tom Cruise rigging a trap door inside the x-ray machine in order to steal a package that coming to the airport with only 4 hours' notice? Ha! 4 hours....usually they come over at 3pm to ask if anyone can run a transport on a flight leaving at 4:45! Luckily those flights are usually in F
jonesing is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 5:43 pm
  #28  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,610
Originally Posted by jonesing
Luckily those flights are usually in F
But you don't get to enjoy the free booze.
exerda is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 5:52 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by jonesing
You know, I can understand the first concern because of the type of stuff we do but c'mon, Tom Cruise rigging a trap door inside the x-ray machine in order to steal a package that coming to the airport with only 4 hours' notice? Ha! 4 hours....usually they come over at 3pm to ask if anyone can run a transport on a flight leaving at 4:45! Luckily those flights are usually in F
Always keep a bag packed! ^
Superguy is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 6:16 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orange County, CA
Programs: Vanishing
Posts: 1,681
Originally Posted by Boraxo
Query: For those who get SSSS, do you always refuse to remove shoes at the checkpoint? Why bother, as you are going to be inconvenienced anyway.
It's only happened once to me so far (Grand Rapids, MI) and they didn't even bring up the subject of shoes. I walked through, didn't alarm, so they just took a swab and that was it as far as the shoes were concerned.
L-1011 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.