Exercise Your Right To Fly Anonymously
#151
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 172
... ?
Originally Posted by BillScann
The only decent thing failed SCOTUS nominee Robert Bork did for America was rent porn at Blockbuster.
Get you facts straight. Robert Bork, a conservative, was nominated to the Supreme Court in 1987. It was liberal extremists who got hold of Judge Bork's video rental history, in the hopes that there would be a history of the rental of "dirty" movies. There was nothing unusual in Judge Bork's video rental history....he rented movies such as "Ruthless People," "A Day at the Races," "The Man Who Knew Too Much," etc. No porn! He would have made a fine Supreme Court justice, one who would have upheld the constitution, unlike some of the current members.
The leaking of Judge Bork's video rental records to the press lead to the 1988 Video Privacy Proctection Act.
Of course, folks on your side of the aisle had no problem when Billy and Hillary had the FBI files of over 400 Republicans in their possession. During
the Watergate era, Charles Colson went to federal prison for having one FBI file in his possession, of a democrat.
#152
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M




Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by GeneralAviation
Get you facts straight. Robert Bork, a conservative, was nominated to the Supreme Court in 1987. It was liberal extremists who got hold of Judge Bork's video rental history, in the hopes that there would be a history of the rental of "dirty" movies. There was nothing unusual in Judge Bork's video rental history....he rented movies such as "Ruthless People," "A Day at the Races," "The Man Who Knew Too Much," etc. No porn! He would have made a fine Supreme Court justice, one who would have upheld the constitution, unlike some of the current members.
The leaking of Judge Bork's video rental records to the press lead to the 1988 Video Privacy Proctection Act.
Of course, folks on your side of the aisle had no problem when Billy and Hillary had the FBI files of over 400 Republicans in their possession. During
the Watergate era, Charles Colson went to federal prison for having one FBI file in his possession, of a democrat.
The leaking of Judge Bork's video rental records to the press lead to the 1988 Video Privacy Proctection Act.
Of course, folks on your side of the aisle had no problem when Billy and Hillary had the FBI files of over 400 Republicans in their possession. During
the Watergate era, Charles Colson went to federal prison for having one FBI file in his possession, of a democrat.
#153
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ANC
Programs: AS MVPG 75K, UA 2P
Posts: 1,453
Originally Posted by GeneralAviation
Get you facts straight. Robert Bork, a conservative, was nominated to the Supreme Court in 1987. It was liberal extremists who got hold of Judge Bork's video rental history, in the hopes that there would be a history of the rental of "dirty" movies.
As an aside, I am not on any 'side of the aisle' buy standing firmly in the aisle. I'd be fine with a Republican in the White House. Unfortunately, the last one left office in January of 1993.
#154
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M




Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by BillScann
As an aside, I am not on any 'side of the aisle' buy standing firmly in the aisle. I'd be fine with a Republican in the White House. Unfortunately, the last one left office in January of 1993.
Ron Paul (R) or Russ Feingold (D
) would both be fine choices to replace the current individual calling himself a Republican.
#155
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Originally Posted by BillScann
As an aside, I am not on any 'side of the aisle' buy standing firmly in the aisle. I'd be fine with a Republican in the White House. Unfortunately, the last one left office in January of 1993.
Bruce
#156
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Spiff
^
Ron Paul (R) or Russ Feingold (D
) would both be fine choices to replace the current individual calling himself a Republican.
Ron Paul (R) or Russ Feingold (D
) would both be fine choices to replace the current individual calling himself a Republican.Do Senators feel less secure when their ID is not checked on a domestic flight? I certainly am no less secure whether their or my ID is checked or not checked.
#157
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 172
Originally Posted by BillScann
Thanks for taking the bait. My point, which you were kind enough to assist in making, is that it was the fear that something might turn up combined with the completely justified belief that it was no ones GD business what someone someone watched in the privacy of their own home that gave video rentals the most stringent privacy protections we have on anything in this country. I would argue that there are many, many other things that are no ones business.
As an aside, I am not on any 'side of the aisle' buy standing firmly in the aisle. I'd be fine with a Republican in the White House. Unfortunately, the last one left office in January of 1993.
As an aside, I am not on any 'side of the aisle' buy standing firmly in the aisle. I'd be fine with a Republican in the White House. Unfortunately, the last one left office in January of 1993.
OK. I'm neither a Republican nor am I a Democrat....I'm a conservative.
I agree with Bruce's post down below....about the last Republican
leaving office in 1989. George H. Bush ran as a Reagan conservative,
and as soon as he was elected, he tossed out all the Reaganites who
helped get him, George H., elected. He was, on many issues, a
RINO....Republican in Name Only. I'm not surprised he wasn't
re-elected, not that Bill Clinton was any great improvement.
As for George W., some times I swear by him, some times I swear
at him. I still prefer him over Gore or Kerry.
I'd like to see more than two candidates in the Presidental debates
in 2008 (fat chance!). Two choices is one choice more than no
choice at all.
Believe it or not, there's alot of conservatives who were, and are,
opposed to the creation of the TSA, the Patriot Act, the Department
of Homeland Security, and the like. Unfortunately, few, if any of
them, are members of Congress. I'm all for going after the terrorists
and the countries that support them, but I'm NOT in favor of
tossing out our freedoms and civil liberties here at home, nor am I
in favor of treating people like criminal suspects at the airport.
I half agree with Spiff....Ron Paul is one of my favorites,
Russ Feingold is not.
Cheers
#158
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Originally Posted by GeneralAviation
...As for George W., some times I swear by him, some times I swear at him. I still prefer him over Gore or Kerry.
As a final thought, if the Democrats run Hillary Clinton as their candidate in 2008, they deserve to disappear from the U.S. political map, in the same way as the Whigs did years ago. I can think of no other candidate who is guaranteed to lose the general election. It almost doesn't matter who the Republicans run. By the way, this is not a comment on Hillary's abilities in general, just on her ability to get elected president!
Bruce
#159
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
Originally Posted by bdschobel
I have no use for George W. at all but was twice amazed at the weak candidates that the Democrats ran against him. Gore was more or less a logical choice, being a sitting VP, but Kerry was just a loser from the very beginning. At a minimum, he was far from the Democrats' strongest potential candidate. Personally, I believe that John Edwards would have done better at the top of the ticket.
As a final thought, if the Democrats run Hillary Clinton as their candidate in 2008, they deserve to disappear from the U.S. political map, in the same way as the Whigs did years ago. I can think of no other candidate who is guaranteed to lose the general election. It almost doesn't matter who the Republicans run. By the way, this is not a comment on Hillary's abilities in general, just on her ability to get elected president!
As a final thought, if the Democrats run Hillary Clinton as their candidate in 2008, they deserve to disappear from the U.S. political map, in the same way as the Whigs did years ago. I can think of no other candidate who is guaranteed to lose the general election. It almost doesn't matter who the Republicans run. By the way, this is not a comment on Hillary's abilities in general, just on her ability to get elected president!
How could the democrats not learn from that?
#160
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
I feel the same way. After and leading up to that healthcare reform initiative she had during her husband's administration, she was the most hated woman in America.
How could the democrats not learn from that?
How could the democrats not learn from that?

And the primary process does what it does. Even Sen. McCain who is one of the most nationally electable individuals would have trouble winning the Republican primaries for the 2008 Presidential race. That's the flipside of Sen. Rodham-Clinton.
#161
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
Originally Posted by Spiff
^
I refuse to identify myself if I do not have to. I don't want my government forcing me to identify myself without a really good reason to do so. Traveling by air is not a really good reason. An airline wanting to protect its revenue is a more palatable reason to ask me for ID or at least some questions that would identify me as the purchaser/traveler, but when the government tells me I must show ID or be haraSSSSed when I fly, I want to tell that government to go pound sand and replace those in government responsible for such asinine mandates.
I refuse to identify myself if I do not have to. I don't want my government forcing me to identify myself without a really good reason to do so. Traveling by air is not a really good reason. An airline wanting to protect its revenue is a more palatable reason to ask me for ID or at least some questions that would identify me as the purchaser/traveler, but when the government tells me I must show ID or be haraSSSSed when I fly, I want to tell that government to go pound sand and replace those in government responsible for such asinine mandates.
#162
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The Marriott Crystal City Gateway and the Hilton Crystal City are the two properties in the DC-area where I routinely hear about ID demands from hotel employees. At the latter they even took photo copies of ID, and it's not clear what the hotel did with such photocopies. 

#163
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
Originally Posted by themicah
Revenue protection. If they didn't require ID, anybody could fly on anybody else's ticket, and that would kill the airlines' entire pricing model.
For example, you or I could buy a bunch of $200 transcons and sell them for $300 to last-minute business travelers who needed a seat.
For example, you or I could buy a bunch of $200 transcons and sell them for $300 to last-minute business travelers who needed a seat.
#164




Join Date: May 2005
Location: MIA/SJU/MCO
Programs: AA LT PLT; DL GLD, UA nothing, B6 Mosaic; Emerald Club Executive
Posts: 3,333
Originally Posted by Yaatri
Is scalping illegal?
Other restrictions can apply, such as location of the sale, distance from the event, permission from the producer/management, etc.
#165
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
Originally Posted by Yaatri
That's what I have tried to do. Sometimes, I must admit, I have been weak. At Arby's, I was asked to show my ID when I used a credit card. The manager said the credit card compmany asked him to do that when he swiped my card. I was hungry, nothing else was open. The gulf coast is still not normal after Katrina. I came back and called the customer service with address and phone number of the merchant. The credit card compmay agreed with me that I didn't have to show my ID and told me they put the merchant on probabtion, whatever that means.

