Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

How is the security provided by TSA when compared to El Al?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

How is the security provided by TSA when compared to El Al?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 1:28 am
  #91  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Nights
30 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,859
They often enough don't care about Rights either and occassionally don't mind stepping on them either.
What rights are you talking about GU?

There are a lot of things we *think* we are entitled to as 'rights' that are not at all rights.

Certain members of the security services at TLV and who run foreign stations have the authority, under the law, to inspect you to their satisfaction. If you do not wish to be inspected, you don't fly. They have an orange card explaining this if you want to press it.

Speaking from extensive personal experience, they really do care about trying to be as respectful and sensitive as possible for all passengers. They care a great deal about what they do, they have respect for the threat they face and they approach it from a responsible viewpoint. This is not a stupid $7 alternate to Mcdonalds job.

One time one of those 'human rights' yahoo kid told one of them that he was just like a nazi who pulls people out of the line at auschwitz to be put into the gas chambers. To a jew, this is an extremely sensitive and personal attack. He calmly replied to her: "Perhaps, but either way, you're going to walk out of here alive and well".
entropy is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 2:07 am
  #92  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by entropy
What rights are you talking about GU?
Rights. Does that include the "right" not to be treated differently on the basis of ethnicity/religion -- especially if it's one's own country? Does that include the "right" not to have stolen information -- violation of property rights and data protection laws, even and especially in other countries -- being used to wrongfully flag you on the basis of perceived ethnicity/religion? I could go on, but:

Originally Posted by GUWonder
Sometimes I don't feel like writing a treatise. And sometimes I don't feel like elaborating on my prior statements -- statements which I stand by -- especially when it's likely to be used to feed someone looking for a protracted "debate" in which I don't have current interest. This is one of those times. Other times may not be.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 9:47 am
  #93  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Nights
30 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,859
Rights. Does that include the "right" not to be treated differently on the basis of ethnicity/religion -- especially if it's one's own country?
You have the right to the free practice of your religion. More intense questioning and search based on your religion is not against the law. It is a fact that the kind of people who are most likely to carry out terror attacks against El Al are Muslims between the ages of 18-40 and people with whom they are associated (girlfriends, etc).
People around here whine (with good reason) when grandma and granpa smith are SSSSS'd and given the 5th degree by the TSA. It helps to have this thing called JUDGEMENT, and LY knows who they are looking for.
entropy is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 11:26 am
  #94  
J-M
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Pointy End
Posts: 3,565
Originally Posted by entropy
You have the right to the free practice of your religion. More intense questioning and search based on your religion is not against the law. It is a fact that the kind of people who are most likely to carry out terror attacks against El Al are Muslims between the ages of 18-40 and people with whom they are associated (girlfriends, etc).
People around here whine (with good reason) when grandma and granpa smith are SSSSS'd and given the 5th degree by the TSA. It helps to have this thing called JUDGEMENT, and LY knows who they are looking for.
You live in San Fran AND you have your head screwed on straight? Sir, I congratulate you ^ . Point very well made!
J-M is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 11:29 am
  #95  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
The El Al (and Israeli) haystacks aren't empty, so I can't blame them for doing what they do to try to find the ever-present needles.

The USA, on the other hand . . .
FWAAA is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 12:21 pm
  #96  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by entropy
You have the right to the free practice of your religion. More intense questioning and search based on your religion is not against the law. It is a fact that the kind of people who are most likely to carry out terror attacks against El Al are Muslims between the ages of 18-40 and people with whom they are associated (girlfriends, etc).
People around here whine (with good reason) when grandma and granpa smith are SSSSS'd and given the 5th degree by the TSA. It helps to have this thing called JUDGEMENT, and LY knows who they are looking for.
When the right to free practice of religion involves being harassed, abused, detained, imprisoned, tortured or killed for being a member of a religion, then Rights are being trampled on.

Just because someone can manufacture a justification, doesn't make something right. .... and "the security force's " judgement appears to be often flawed given the number of "fish" stopped and then released.

Last edited by GUWonder; Dec 6, 2005 at 12:23 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 12:26 pm
  #97  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,700
That we do not profile flyers for terroristic characteristics, and focus screening activities on those who fit the profile, is foolish and wasteful, IMO.

I can't remember the last time I took a trip (and that's at least weekly) without seeing someone ridiculous getting the full treatment. Think the once-every-10-years elderly couple. Or the woman with the baby.
Mikey likes it is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 12:43 pm
  #98  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 754
Talking

Originally Posted by Mikey likes it
That we do not profile flyers for terroristic characteristics, and focus screening activities on those who fit the profile, is foolish and wasteful, IMO.

I can't remember the last time I took a trip (and that's at least weekly) without seeing someone ridiculous getting the full treatment. Think the once-every-10-years elderly couple. Or the woman with the baby.
Oh, comeon it's fun! Either it's the 90 year old who hasn't bathed since he was 75, or it's the kid that ran up to the parent during screening, so then I get to have a three year old stand feet spread while I pat him down - nothing makes me feel greater than when I'm doing that! [/sarcasm]
n5667 is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 1:12 pm
  #99  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest
Programs: AA, UA, DL, LUV, SPG, HHonors, Avis, Hertz
Posts: 3,033
Originally Posted by GUWonder
When the right to free practice of religion involves being harassed, abused, detained, imprisoned, tortured or killed for being a member of a religion, then Rights are being trampled on.

Just because someone can manufacture a justification, doesn't make something right. .... and "the security force's " judgement appears to be often flawed given the number of "fish" stopped and then released.
At whom are you leveling this criticism?
Jakebeth is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 1:21 pm
  #100  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Jakebeth
At whom are you leveling this criticism?
At those whom use self-admitted religion as a criteria to do to others as I said above.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 1:23 pm
  #101  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Mikey likes it
That we do not profile flyers for terroristic characteristics, and focus screening activities on those who fit the profile, is foolish and wasteful, IMO.

I can't remember the last time I took a trip (and that's at least weekly) without seeing someone ridiculous getting the full treatment. Think the once-every-10-years elderly couple. Or the woman with the baby.
In your mind, "terroristic characteristics" are what exactly? People with whose race/religion you don't identify/self-identify?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 1:52 pm
  #102  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest
Programs: AA, UA, DL, LUV, SPG, HHonors, Avis, Hertz
Posts: 3,033
Originally Posted by GUWonder
At those whom use self-admitted religion as a criteria to do to others as I said above.
I'm not trying to be disrespectful GUWonder, but you've been tossing around a lot of hand grenades in this thread.

If you feel like discussing these issues with all of us, great. If not, then why are you bothering?
Jakebeth is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 1:56 pm
  #103  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Jakebeth
I'm not trying to be disrespectful GUWonder, but you've been tossing around a lot of hand grenades in this thread.

If you feel like discussing these issues with all of us, great. If not, then why are you bothering?
No hand grenades being tossed, claim as you may. As I said earlier:

Sometimes I don't feel like writing a treatise. And sometimes I don't feel like elaborating on my prior statements -- statements which I stand by -- especially when it's likely to be used to feed someone looking for a protracted "debate" in which I don't have current interest. This is one of those times. Other times may not be.
.... that' why -- as indicated in my repeated quote in this thread -- I don't always "bother".

I discussed to the extent I wished, but then some wanted to go fishing and complained when I didn't go along.

... that's what I get for "playing along 'with all of us'".
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 2:01 pm
  #104  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest
Programs: AA, UA, DL, LUV, SPG, HHonors, Avis, Hertz
Posts: 3,033
Originally Posted by GUWonder
No hand grenades being tossed, claim as you may. As I said earlier:



.... that' why -- as indicated in my repeated quote in this thread -- I don't always "bother".

I discussed to the extent I wished, but then some wanted to go fishing and complained when I didn't go along.

... that's what I get for "playing along 'with all of us'".
But you ARE bothering.
Jakebeth is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 2:06 pm
  #105  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Jakebeth
But you ARE bothering.
.... that' why -- as indicated in my repeated quote in this thread -- I don't always "bother".
Always.

If you (or anyone) ARE bothered -- by fickle choice -- c'est la vie. I certainly will not always bother as

sometimes I don't feel like elaborating on my prior statements -- statements which I stand by -- especially when it's likely to be used to feed someone looking for a protracted "debate" in which I don't have current interest.

Last edited by GUWonder; Dec 6, 2005 at 2:23 pm
GUWonder is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.