Will Airports now look to go private? (TSA)
Jan 26, 2019, 10:38 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 616
Will Airports now look to go private? (TSA)
Now that the shutdown is over, do you think some airports will look at the option to privatize their security a la SFO? My thought it it would eliminate any headaches should another long-duration shutdown occur.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
Jan 26, 2019, 1:51 pm
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,166
I think it depends upon the ability of the local airport authority to strong-arm the local politicians who must make it happen.
One question: Did anyone fly through a contractor airport (SFO, MCI, ?) and a TSA-controlled airport and notice any differences? I know there are lots of other variables, but, did anything jump out at you?
One question: Did anyone fly through a contractor airport (SFO, MCI, ?) and a TSA-controlled airport and notice any differences? I know there are lots of other variables, but, did anything jump out at you?
Jan 27, 2019, 7:14 am
#5
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Locally there doesn’t appear to be any serious discussion of going private at least none that has hit the news. SAT is relatively small and the news never reported or made a big deal of any delays. I would think if the airlines didn’t make a stink about security delays most local governments would rather stay out of the TSA security business.
Jan 28, 2019, 7:28 am
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Locally there doesn’t appear to be any serious discussion of going private at least none that has hit the news. SAT is relatively small and the news never reported or made a big deal of any delays. I would think if the airlines didn’t make a stink about security delays most local governments would rather stay out of the TSA security business.
Jan 28, 2019, 9:15 am
#7
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Palm Beach/ New England
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, DL GM, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 4,383
I think it depends upon the ability of the local airport authority to strong-arm the local politicians who must make it happen.
One question: Did anyone fly through a contractor airport (SFO, MCI, ?) and a TSA-controlled airport and notice any differences? I know there are lots of other variables, but, did anything jump out at you?
One question: Did anyone fly through a contractor airport (SFO, MCI, ?) and a TSA-controlled airport and notice any differences? I know there are lots of other variables, but, did anything jump out at you?
Jan 28, 2019, 9:38 am
#8
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Park, CO
Programs: Tegridy Elite
Posts: 5,678
That may not preclude the possibility of screening being impacted by a lapse in appropriations, though. TSA awards the contracts for contracted screeners under the Screening Partnership Program (SPP) and I assume uses appropriated funds for most or all of the contract costs. Hopefully TSA contracting folks award the contracts such that their annual periods of performance are offset from the fiscal-year cycle to help avoid the usual new-fiscal-year shutdown risks. Yet at some point in the year each contract will need to have the next year's screening services option funded. If the time to fund that next period happens to fall during a lapse in TSA appropriations, then the contractor operating under that particular contract would cease providing services until additional funding is appropriated. And private-sector contract employees can't be forced to work without pay.
Presumably the contracts for the airports involved in the SPP have annual service option periods that begin and end on different dates, so it's unlikely that every such airport would be affected simultaneously. But the SPP isn't a guarantee against all shutdown-related impacts.
Nor would it help the air traffic control staffing issues which are more likely to be the straw that breaks the camel's back, than passenger screening slowness.
Presumably the contracts for the airports involved in the SPP have annual service option periods that begin and end on different dates, so it's unlikely that every such airport would be affected simultaneously. But the SPP isn't a guarantee against all shutdown-related impacts.
Nor would it help the air traffic control staffing issues which are more likely to be the straw that breaks the camel's back, than passenger screening slowness.