Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Are CBP checkpoint overseas equivalent to local checkpoints?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Are CBP checkpoint overseas equivalent to local checkpoints?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 2:32 am
  #1  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,076
Are CBP checkpoint overseas equivalent to local checkpoints?

It just dawned on me that there are some CBP preclearance checkpoint overseas.

Are these checkpoint equivalent to local ones? In other words would I need to reclear CBP or TSA when I land stateside?
Rommie2k6 is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 2:59 am
  #2  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 5,017
With pre clearance checkpoint you arrive at what is basically a domestic terminal. So no need to re-clear CBP or TSA.
FlyingUnderTheRadar is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 3:35 am
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Rommie2k6
It just dawned on me that there are some CBP preclearance checkpoint overseas.

Are these checkpoint equivalent to local ones? In other words would I need to reclear CBP or TSA when I land stateside?
For most purposes for most people, they are functionally equivalent in that you wouldnt need to reclear CBP or TSA on arrival at US territory.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 5:30 am
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 582
CBP preclearance locations do have one practical difference for US citizens: onward travel to the US is de-facto at the discretion of CBP.

A US citizen at other points of entry may be detained for secondary screening, and may have his or her belongings searched or seized, but ultimately they cannot be refused entry to the US. At a preclearance checkpoint, CBP may not be able to technically deny entry to US citizens, but they can detain them long enough to make them miss the day's flights. Lather, rinse, repeat.

This is not hypothetical; I was relatively recently coerced this way at DUB preclearance (i.e. directly threatened with being sent to secondary with the clear implication that I would not be allowed to fly) to answer questions about my employment and whether I or other members of my family hold any other nationalities - questions that I would not have to answer at a stateside checkpoint. I did not have the luxury at the time of taking a principled stand, but neither do I plan to return to the US via DUB on future trips.
pilot007 likes this.
terrier is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 6:22 am
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
The entire purpose of Pre-Clearance is to avoid the necessity of clearance on arrival at a standard FIS. While, in very rare circumstances, CBP may choose to conduct a secondary inspection on arrival, when you arrive at your US POE, you will almost certainly be processed as any arriving domestic passenger and therefore, if connecting, will only need to pass through a TSA checkpoint if there is no airside physical route to your new departure gate. But, that would occur on a domestic connection as well.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 11:22 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Often1
The entire purpose of Pre-Clearance is to avoid the necessity of clearance on arrival at a standard FIS.
That is not the entire purpose of CBP preclearance — and it wasn’t the purpose even before CBP was created and staffed Preclearance as such.

There has been more than one purpose involved in the US setting up Preclearance facilities abroad. Some of it was commercially/budget related, some of it security related, some of it to assist countries’ economies/people, and/or a combination of those. The outcome from pursuit for such purposes is a reduction in the necessity of and some problems related to clearance efforts on arrivals at US ports proper.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018 | 12:36 pm
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by Often1
[...] if connecting, will only need to pass through a TSA checkpoint if there is no airside physical route to your new departure gate.
Pretty much. For example, flew DUB-PHL. Went through DUB security, then DUB preclearence FIS security. Arrived in PHL, just walked to next gate.

Same goes for BOS if you're flying Aer Lingus or Westjet (provided you're flying jetBlue or Delta)

Air Canada, not so much... considering the gate area is the size of a cubicle and is isolated from the rest of the terminal. Thankfully, that's changing within the next 6-12 months.
LoganTSO is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2018 | 8:26 pm
  #8  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Spire Ambassador, Radisson Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 3,750
Originally Posted by terrier
CBP preclearance locations do have one practical difference for US citizens: onward travel to the US is de-facto at the discretion of CBP.

A US citizen at other points of entry may be detained for secondary screening, and may have his or her belongings searched or seized, but ultimately they cannot be refused entry to the US. At a preclearance checkpoint, CBP may not be able to technically deny entry to US citizens, but they can detain them long enough to make them miss the day's flights. Lather, rinse, repeat.

This is not hypothetical; I was relatively recently coerced this way at DUB preclearance (i.e. directly threatened with being sent to secondary with the clear implication that I would not be allowed to fly) to answer questions about my employment and whether I or other members of my family hold any other nationalities - questions that I would not have to answer at a stateside checkpoint. I did not have the luxury at the time of taking a principled stand, but neither do I plan to return to the US via DUB on future trips.
That's interesting. Do you think it's possible they were bluffing and they would have let you on the plane if you had silently stood your ground?
jphripjah is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2018 | 2:00 am
  #9  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 582
Originally Posted by jphripjah
That's interesting. Do you think it's possible they were bluffing and they would have let you on the plane if you had silently stood your ground?
Sure, it's possible. At the time I was on my way to a family wedding, and thus was not willing to call such a bluff or take a stand on principle over information that the US government already has from my tax filings.

If they'd demanded email or phone or social media passwords or something, the calculus might have been different.
terrier is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2018 | 7:31 am
  #10  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Spire Ambassador, Radisson Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 3,750
Originally Posted by terrier
Sure, it's possible. At the time I was on my way to a family wedding, and thus was not willing to call such a bluff or take a stand on principle over information that the US government already has from my tax filings.

If they'd demanded email or phone or social media passwords or something, the calculus might have been different.
If they were simply asking your occupation, they would also have that from the line on your passport application. CBP officers definitely have immediate access to passport application info, I had a guy who kept demanding to know if the destination address I listed on the blue form was my home address ("none of your business") and when I later FOIA'd the records of the inspection he had made notes that my destination address was different from the address I listed on my passport application.

I recommend using FOIA to get the notes of your secondary inspections, they can be quite interesting.
jphripjah is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.