Last edit by: aztimm
US/UK Electronics bans discussion
This thread is intended for discussion of how the recent US and UK electronics bans impact travel with discussion.
For more discussion of this topic, please follow the appropriate thread below:
For basic questions, what is/isn't allowed, use this thread in the Travel Safety/Security Practical forum
To discuss the merits of the rules, with the option of political discussion, follow this thread to the Omni-PR forum
(note: there are time/post restrictions for access to Omni)
Political discussion will not be tolerated in this thread.
Signed in members with 90 days / 90 posts can edit this Wikipost; wiki contents may be printed by using the (lower right wiki corner)
Electronic Devices Banned on Flights to US & UK from 10 ME Countries
#31
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: PHL
Programs: AAdvantage, DL SkyMiles, B6 TrueBlue, Global Entry
Posts: 56
It would be good if the TSA or department that issued this ban actually did a proper press release stating what the ban is for, where it applies, which airlines it applies, and how long this will be implemented for/from and till.
And does it affect passengers on transit, etc etc.
Everything is so damn vague, it is actually going to cause massive problems for a hell of a lot of people who have no idea about the ban and are potentially already on flights or whom are boarding flights and/or are on a flight and will be landing to jump on a transit flight.
I have friends who just landed in Dubai and have absolutely no idea about any ban on carry on electronics (lap tops) and have a 5 hour transit/wait before connecting on to NY...what are they supposed to do now? Leave their lap tops behind in Dubai?
Ship the lap tops back home to the US by courier if the courier companies will even accept the lap tops/batteries?
I can already imagine the fustration/anger and disappointment a lot of travellers will be going through when they are told at the gate they can't board.
And does it affect passengers on transit, etc etc.
Everything is so damn vague, it is actually going to cause massive problems for a hell of a lot of people who have no idea about the ban and are potentially already on flights or whom are boarding flights and/or are on a flight and will be landing to jump on a transit flight.
I have friends who just landed in Dubai and have absolutely no idea about any ban on carry on electronics (lap tops) and have a 5 hour transit/wait before connecting on to NY...what are they supposed to do now? Leave their lap tops behind in Dubai?
Ship the lap tops back home to the US by courier if the courier companies will even accept the lap tops/batteries?
I can already imagine the fustration/anger and disappointment a lot of travellers will be going through when they are told at the gate they can't board.
#32
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: VPS
Programs: IHG Diamond, Delta PM, Hilton Gold, Accor Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 7,266
Reminded me of this incident:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-35521646
But I'm one of the many who are not sure how putting such a device in the hold is somehow safer than having it in cabin.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-35521646
But I'm one of the many who are not sure how putting such a device in the hold is somehow safer than having it in cabin.
#34
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,753
Several articles in the NYTimes. The ban applies to all nonstop flights to the U.S. originating in Cairo, Amman, Kuwait City, Casablanca, Doha, Riyadh, Jedda, Istanbul, Abu Dhabi and Dubai. It doesn't affect any U.S. airlines because none of them have nonstops from these cities to the U.S. (I think).
I have to wonder if the complaints by DL and others about unfair advantage of Middle East carriers played into this at all given President Trump's stated intention to give advantages to U.S. businesses.
Will be interesting to see how AAB responds. This will wreak havoc with his expansion strategy, a huge piece of which is increasing the number of U.S. cities to which QR flies nonstop.
Bound to affect Boeing, too.
And laptops in checked bags are bound to become bait for baggage theft, even with TSA locks, no?
So now what do we all do with the nonrefundable tickets we just bought during the great QR sales? I'm not doing anything until I see how QR handles it; but it might end up being cheaper to buy an extra laptop and leave it at the other end.
I have to wonder if the complaints by DL and others about unfair advantage of Middle East carriers played into this at all given President Trump's stated intention to give advantages to U.S. businesses.
Will be interesting to see how AAB responds. This will wreak havoc with his expansion strategy, a huge piece of which is increasing the number of U.S. cities to which QR flies nonstop.
Bound to affect Boeing, too.
And laptops in checked bags are bound to become bait for baggage theft, even with TSA locks, no?
So now what do we all do with the nonrefundable tickets we just bought during the great QR sales? I'm not doing anything until I see how QR handles it; but it might end up being cheaper to buy an extra laptop and leave it at the other end.
Last edited by Dr. HFH; Mar 20, 2017 at 11:19 pm
#35
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 92
Oh most definitely. Camera equipment, too. This seems rather ridiculous considering you aren't supposed to check lithium batteries at all either, or transport them outside of the device they are in (unless you have the proper packaging to prevent shorts -- which most travelers probably don't have).
#36
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by AP
A U.S. official told The Associated Press the ban will apply to nonstop flights to the U.S. from 10 international airports serving the cities of Cairo in Egypt; Amman in Jordan; Kuwait City in Kuwait; Casablanca in Morocco; Doha in Qatar; Riyadh and Jeddah in Saudi Arabia; Istanbul in Turkey; and Abu Dhabi and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.
The ban was indefinite, said the official, who was not authorized to disclose the details of the ban ahead of a public announcement and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The ban was indefinite, said the official, who was not authorized to disclose the details of the ban ahead of a public announcement and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
That's only 8 countries on this ban list, all in the MENA:
1. Egypt
2. Jordan
3. Kuwait
4. Morocco
5. Qatar
6. Saudi Arabia
7. Turkey
8. UAE
The US3 and EU3 cartel kingpin airlines going to complain about this ban? I doubt it, they dislike competition and want the passenger traffic to go via Europe rather than circumvent them via the MENA.
#37
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somewhere in Florida
Posts: 2,622
I'm not sure what TSA is thinking on this. Risk-wise, having all of those unprotected lithium-ions bouncing around in cargo is far worse than terrorists. As others have pointed out, it's nothing to book two separate tickets and connect in an "approved" country, bypassing this ban.
We need to ban bans.
#38
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Global
Posts: 5,998
This seems like a very thinly veiled attempt to hit the middle east big 3, as each of their home bases is on the list.
Hard to believe this is a security issue.... fly a US carrier, no problem, devices welcome. Fly a foreign carrier on the same route, put it in the cargo hold. (Which, as others have stated, does not provide much if any, additional security.)
Also, wonder how this will work at the airport. Tomorrow, we will be connecting in DOH from Asia. (Asia-DOH-LAX) Where are we to surrender our laptops?
Before our flight in Asia? No way Asia airports will be setup for that. Also, some people will have laptops on the flight. (At DOH, there is typically no security screening for flights from Asia until the USA flight.)
Wait until the USA extra screening in DOH? THAT would be a mess!!! And how will that work, assuming you checked your bag in Asia, you check your laptop bag?
#39
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, Wash. USA
Posts: 1,531
Several articles in the NYTimes. The ban applies to all nonstop flights to the U.S. originating in Cairo, Amman, Kuwait City, Casablanca, Doha, Riyadh, Jedda, Istanbul, Abu Dhabi and Dubai. It doesn't affect any U.S. airlines because none of them have nonstops from these cities to the U.S. (I think).
#41
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: PNW
Programs: BAEC Silver, DL GM, AA Plat, NEXUS
Posts: 467
"The ban applies to all nonstop flights to the U.S. originating in Cairo, Amman, Kuwait City, Casablanca, Doha, Riyadh, Jedda, Istanbul, Abu Dhabi and Dubai."
Clearly racial profiling. Every Muslim-majority country with flights to the US is targeted.
There are now talks about Arab countries shutting their US embassies.
Clearly racial profiling. Every Muslim-majority country with flights to the US is targeted.
There are now talks about Arab countries shutting their US embassies.
#42
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TLV
Programs: UA Platinum, Avis Chairman, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, GA Pilot
Posts: 3,225
There are a number of reasons to stop flying TK but I guess this is the last straw. I almost booked a ticket on TK for April, but ended up on DL so I guess I inadvertently made the right choice. I'm all for better security but this is just idiotic. If there's an inside job from the ground crew this won't matter. The Sharm El Sheik flight got brought down by a bomb in a soda can smuggled by the ground crew.
#43
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Turkey
Programs: Miles and Smiles Elite Plus
Posts: 184
TK announced they received no ban yet and their security checks have not changed as of today.
This is all very new, also it might end up being a very short ban if some court decides to rule against it. With US airlines being exempt, I would expect that ruling to happen very quickly.
So before we all go out there and buy some walmart laptops I think it is a good idea to keep calm and wait it out unless you have a flight tomorrow and your airline makes a specific announcement.
This is all very new, also it might end up being a very short ban if some court decides to rule against it. With US airlines being exempt, I would expect that ruling to happen very quickly.
So before we all go out there and buy some walmart laptops I think it is a good idea to keep calm and wait it out unless you have a flight tomorrow and your airline makes a specific announcement.
#44
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Programs: DL GM
Posts: 515
It is fascinating to me that the airlines that fly these routes are all national and/or state owned airlines of countries that the United States is allied with in some form or another. I could *maybe* understand Egypt because of ongoing concerns regarding civil aviation security, but even that is a stretch. The UAE? Jordan? Morocco? Come on.
I'm far more concerned about having things stolen from checked baggage or having improperly packed or loaded baggage deciding to catch on fire than I've ever been about terrorism.
If someone is capable of sneaking a bomb-laden electronic device through passenger security, they sure as heck are capable of getting it through checked baggage security. At least if they are in the passenger cabin maybe it could be identified and stopped ie the shoe bomber, a bomb going off in the hold is pretty much the end. It is far more likely that a low wage ground worker will be paid off to plant something in the hold anyway. A paid off baggage worker is how the bomb got on the MetroJet disaster that led to Russia's ban of Egyptian flights to begin with, a ban I'm sure this is partially based on. It's far easier to do that than it would be trying to sneak through security with something these days.
That's all without even getting into the logistics of this. Like the post above mentioned, what about people who are connecting through DXB, AUH or DOH from Asia or Australia? What about all the Americans returning home from business trips to the Gulf? I'd imagine that's a big chunk of the people flying some of these routes. I wouldn't want to be the one to tell them no laptop to pass the 13-14 hours.
I'm far more concerned about having things stolen from checked baggage or having improperly packed or loaded baggage deciding to catch on fire than I've ever been about terrorism.
If someone is capable of sneaking a bomb-laden electronic device through passenger security, they sure as heck are capable of getting it through checked baggage security. At least if they are in the passenger cabin maybe it could be identified and stopped ie the shoe bomber, a bomb going off in the hold is pretty much the end. It is far more likely that a low wage ground worker will be paid off to plant something in the hold anyway. A paid off baggage worker is how the bomb got on the MetroJet disaster that led to Russia's ban of Egyptian flights to begin with, a ban I'm sure this is partially based on. It's far easier to do that than it would be trying to sneak through security with something these days.
That's all without even getting into the logistics of this. Like the post above mentioned, what about people who are connecting through DXB, AUH or DOH from Asia or Australia? What about all the Americans returning home from business trips to the Gulf? I'd imagine that's a big chunk of the people flying some of these routes. I wouldn't want to be the one to tell them no laptop to pass the 13-14 hours.
#45
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New York
Posts: 7,347
How will this ban affect Emirates' fifth-freedom flights, like the DXB-MXP-JFK, and DXB-ATH-EWR?
I presume that these flights will not be affected because there is a stop in Europe! They are not nonstop flights.
Carfield
I presume that these flights will not be affected because there is a stop in Europe! They are not nonstop flights.
Carfield