Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Fox News: Congress should abolish the TSA -- it's time to privatize airport screening

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Fox News: Congress should abolish the TSA -- it's time to privatize airport screening

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2013, 6:39 am
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Fox News: Congress should abolish the TSA -- it's time to privatize airport screening

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/...ort-screening/

Snippet:

A government study that finds a program doesn’t work and proposes to cut it is almost as rare as pigs that fly. But a new Government Accountability Office study on aviation does just that: it proposes chopping the Transportation Security Administration’s SPOT security program because it finds no evidence that it could stop airline terrorists.

The GAO routinely finds waste in programs, but it usually just proposes ways to fix them -- so the Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques program must be really lame. The GAO finds no “scientifically validated evidence” for the $200 million program, and it says that TSA deployed it before even doing a cost-benefit analysis.

That failure is one of many discussed in my new study on TSA, which proposes dismantling the agency.
Not a bad read. I've been seeing more articles like this.

Now only if they'd gain some traction.
Superguy is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 7:30 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,280
Originally Posted by Superguy
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/...ort-screening/

Snippet:



Not a bad read. I've been seeing more articles like this.

Now only if they'd gain some traction.
Hopefully this is the start of a snowball rolling down hill.

TSA has no concept of what it should be doing so closing shop is the correct path forward. I wonder if TSA ever started screening all cargo loaded aboard commercial passenger aircraft as mandated by Congress.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 7:56 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 574
TSA has no concept of what it should be doing so closing shop is the correct path forward.


Agreed.
Consequently I feel they should change over to the following uniform
http://www.hollywoodapples.com/files...who_say_ni.jpg
and call themselves "The Knights who say Niiiiiiiiiiiiiii."
yandosan is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 8:21 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Privatizing won't make a bit of difference if government insists on using the same methods of screening people. Not only does screening need to be privatized but we need to go back to procedures in effect before 9/11.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 8:25 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCO
Programs: DL-DM/1MM, HILTON-DIA, .HYATT-DIA/GLOB , IHG-PLT,HERTZ 5*, NATIONAL ES
Posts: 8,691
Originally Posted by petaluma1
Privatizing won't make a bit of difference if government insists on using the same methods of screening people. Not only does screening need to be privatized but we need to go back to procedures in effect before 9/11.
^ I for one would love to see TSA go, but as long as the gov't is calling the shots, even privatization alone will not fix things.
Crazyhotelguy is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 9:17 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Outer Space
Programs: AA, UA,WN, Hilton Honors, Marriott
Posts: 61
Originally Posted by petaluma1
Privatizing won't make a bit of difference if government insists on using the same methods of screening people. Not only does screening need to be privatized but we need to go back to procedures in effect before 9/11.
We had private screeners at IAD on September 11. How'd that work out?
Millon deFloss is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 9:22 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,280
Originally Posted by petaluma1
Privatizing won't make a bit of difference if government insists on using the same methods of screening people. Not only does screening need to be privatized but we need to go back to procedures in effect before 9/11.
At the start I would agree that just privatizing screening would not really change but where I see hope is people more concerned with managing cost looking at the stupidity that TSA has built into the screening process. Machines that don't work, people standing around doing nothing as is seen currently, and other such wasteful ventures.

When cost is a consideration the civilian screeners would have a loud voice.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 9:24 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,280
Originally Posted by Millon deFloss
We had private screeners at IAD on September 11. How'd that work out?
What exactly did those screeners do wrong on September 11?
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 9:36 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Millon deFloss
We had private screeners at IAD on September 11. How'd that work out?
Quite obviously, you don't understand what allowed 9/11. Hint: it was NOT the screening procedures in force on that day.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 10:10 am
  #10  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,960
Originally Posted by Millon deFloss
We had private screeners at IAD on September 11. How'd that work out?
Screening was not the problem on 9/11. Airline employees cooperated with criminals, per the government's mandate.

It's long past time to evict the government from our airports and put the onus of screening on airlines and perhaps airports alone. The government is the problem, not the solution. The government should have zero say in airport and airline security.
Spiff is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 10:20 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Runway 22 @ KROC
Posts: 706
Originally Posted by Millon deFloss
We had private screeners at IAD on September 11. How'd that work out?
Everything that was brought through security was allowed at the time.
United_727 is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 10:24 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCO
Programs: DL-DM/1MM, HILTON-DIA, .HYATT-DIA/GLOB , IHG-PLT,HERTZ 5*, NATIONAL ES
Posts: 8,691
Originally Posted by Millon deFloss
We had private screeners at IAD on September 11. How'd that work out?
Crazyhotelguy is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 10:32 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,280
Originally Posted by United_727
Everything that was brought through security was allowed at the time.
And the FAA was the approving agency of what could be brought through the screening point. A case could be made that "government" failed in establishing screening protocols, not the airlines, airports, or screening contractors.

9/11 was the fault of government.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 10:38 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: ONT
Programs: AA Gold, WN A-, UA S, HH ♦, IHG Spire, Hertz Prez O, TSA Disparager
Posts: 2,159
Originally Posted by Millon deFloss
We had private screeners at IAD on September 11. How'd that work out?
It was legal to carry sharp objects before 9/11 so the private screeners did their job correctly.
Michael El is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2013, 10:43 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
9/11 was the fault of government.
This bears repeating.

If not for the "cooperate with your hijackers" doctrine, it never would have succeeded.

As it is now, it has succeeded in excess of Bin Laden's wildest hopes.

Because of government.
Caradoc is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.