Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Boston theft....again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2012 | 7:42 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Asia
Posts: 647
Boston theft....again

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/10/2...logan-airport/

Never ends, does it? What a pathetic person(s) employed by a pathetic agency run by an even more pathetic director.
bluenotesro is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2012 | 7:48 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,981
Originally Posted by bluenotesro
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/10/2...logan-airport/

Never ends, does it? What a pathetic person(s) employed by a pathetic agency run by an even more pathetic director.
Thefts are so prevalent I'm thinking it must be addressed in the TSA SOP.

How to steal effectively at the Check Point.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2012 | 10:46 pm
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,102
I cannot denying that. TSA is trying to steal the jewelry from the passenger. No one to steal the jewelry, cash and etc. Nobody who touching the carryon bags. Ever! You will lose job. You will fired. No one who responsible for that. You have a many chance to stealing the items. This must stop! Enough is enough! Leave the personal items alone! Don't touch the bags!
N830MH is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2012 | 11:13 pm
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Programs: NZ Elite
Posts: 6,518
I see.... someone only has to claim a theft and it's considered true on these boards.

As long as it's TSA being accused.

Never mind the (awfully convenient) delay in reporting/complaining.... never mind the idea that $3700 worth of jewelry was (allegedly) left in a carry on in the first place....after all noone ever makes false claims of the loss of high value items like that, now do they?

Since TSA has been accused no evidence is required!

So much for innocent until proven guilty eh?
trooper is offline  
Old Oct 27, 2012 | 11:24 pm
  #5  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: DL Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,777
While I do somewhat agree with your whole post I am not given the presumption of innocence by the TSA so why should they get that courteous when there are definite trends indicated otherwise.
the ratio of thefts per TSO vs actually illegal/harmful items attempted to be brought through a checkpoint by a passenger in comparison to the amount of passengers total screws towards the innocence of the passenger.

Originally Posted by trooper
So much for innocent until proven guilty eh?
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 3:49 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SE Asia
Posts: 647
[QUOTE=trooper;19578382]I see.... someone only has to claim a theft and it's considered true on these boards.

As long as it's TSA being accused.

Never mind the (awfully convenient) delay in reporting/complaining.... never mind the idea that $3700 worth of jewelry was (allegedly) left in a carry on in the first place....after all noone ever makes false claims of the loss of high value items like that, now do they?

Since TSA has been accused no evidence is required!

So much for innocent until proven guilty eh?[/QUOTE]

While I am more than willing to consider an individual innocent until proven guilty, this agency and its employees has yet to instill much confidence in most of us on this board. The problem is endemic. The culture at TSA is unprofessional and problematic. Until DHS and TSA get a director who is trustworthy and competent I, as are many of us, am likely to consider the individual guilty. Chances are, he or she is. Prove me wrong.
bluenotesro is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 4:22 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by trooper
I see.... someone only has to claim a theft and it's considered true on these boards.

As long as it's TSA being accused.

Never mind the (awfully convenient) delay in reporting/complaining.... never mind the idea that $3700 worth of jewelry was (allegedly) left in a carry on in the first place....after all noone ever makes false claims of the loss of high value items like that, now do they?

Since TSA has been accused no evidence is required!

So much for innocent until proven guilty eh?
Innocent until guilty is a concept only applicable to the court. We can think whatever we want.

For now, I will give the TSA the benefit of the doubt.

Thats when Ivester says the agent left the area with her bag.
Uh, oh. If this is true, then my doubt meter just dropped a big notch. Let's pull the tape and see. If the screener left the area with the bag it is against procedure at the least and increases my suspicion significantly.

If the tape shows that her bag was always with her, I will defend the TSA on this one. If it shows the bag was taken from her sight or if the tape is not available or was "not functioning," I'm back on the Ivester's side.

It is up to the TSA to prove her claim false. They should have the tapes to do it. If they do not produce them, another TSA failure. If not by theft, it is failure by procedure.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 4:49 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
I'll give TSA the same benefit of the doubt they give me. Sounds about fair.
FlyingCowboy is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 4:49 am
  #9  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 516
Originally Posted by trooper
So much for innocent until proven guilty eh?
Ever hear the saying "what's good for the goose is good for the gander?"

(I understand the administrative search aspect. Still what TSA does is over the top and far from their WEI role.)
OldGoat is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 5:59 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,981
Originally Posted by trooper
I see.... someone only has to claim a theft and it's considered true on these boards.

As long as it's TSA being accused.

Never mind the (awfully convenient) delay in reporting/complaining.... never mind the idea that $3700 worth of jewelry was (allegedly) left in a carry on in the first place....after all noone ever makes false claims of the loss of high value items like that, now do they?

Since TSA has been accused no evidence is required!

So much for innocent until proven guilty eh?
So tell us where other than our carry on to place high value items when transiting a TSA checkpoint. Checked baggage?

How many cases of theft that has been proven before TSA changes procedures to guard against employees having opportunity?

I don't know if your handle "trooper" indicates LEO history or not but wouldn't a wise business operator harden procedures to protect against this being possible?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 9:20 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,226
Originally Posted by trooper

So much for innocent until proven guilty eh?
Since passengers are treated in a "you are a potential terrorist until we decide you aren't" manner by TSA, I fail to see what the problem is.
halls120 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 9:33 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 569
Originally Posted by FlyingCowboy
I'll give TSA the same benefit of the doubt they give me. Sounds about fair.
Sounds good to me.

The day they stop assuming I'm a terrorist,
is the day I'll start assuming they're decent people.
Darkumbra is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 9:46 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 12,672
Mail Online:TSA DELETED its Surveillance Footage *before* beginning its investigation

Here's another article about the same incident... the key detail in this report is that TSA's claim process served as a run-the-clock-out mechanism, guaranteeing that TSA would delete its own surveillance video before TSA even began its internal investigation of the theft:

Mail Online:
Outrage after passenger finds thousands in jewelery 'snatched by TSA worker' and surveillance footage DELETED

PUBLISHED: 10:20 EST, 28 October 2012
UPDATED: 10:22 EST, 28 October 2012


A short quote:
A Boston woman claims TSA agents walked off with thousands of dollars worth of jewellery from her luggage, amid a growing number of similar cases spanning the U.S.

Terri Ivester says it was an agent at Logan International Airport who stopped her after exiting a security checkpoint and, as the TSA says if true, broke protocol.
and
Adding to her outrage, she says the TSA has notified her that any surveillance footage capturing her trip has since been erased.

While in the past security cameras have been used to capture theft, most recently in the news at New Jersey's Newark airport, the TSA says they save the footage for only 30 days.

Mrs Ivester says that most of those days were consumed by her filing a report
RatherBeOnATrain is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 10:23 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Silicon Valley
Programs: UA GS, WN A-List, AA Exec Plat, National Emerald
Posts: 1,021
The TSA FEELS and STEALS the family jewels!

Of course, it's only alleged. But the fact that the TSA conveniently lost the video makes me very suspicious.

See: http://shinybadge.com/2012/10/not-on...o-steals-them/
reamworks is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 12:35 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
Originally Posted by halls120
Since passengers are treated in a "you are a potential terrorist until we decide you aren't" manner by TSA, I fail to see what the problem is.
^^^^^^

yes, after every shift, every TSA clerk needs to be thoroughly and intimately searched under their genitals to determine whether they've stashed some passenger jewelry under the family jewels. That and also use a cavity x-ray machine as they do in gold mines to make sure they didn't squirrel away passengers property up the orifaces. The clerks should have no problem with this, because, you know, it ain't personal.
nachtnebel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.