TSA fights major image problem...
#1
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
TSA fights major image problem...
Really? It's more than just "image"....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/....html?hpid=z10
So, it's simply a matter of "the standards are higher for us, so it looks like we're bad" ???
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/....html?hpid=z10
“I believe it’s more a function of the fact that 1) the standards of conduct are both clearer and more stringent at TSA than at many other federal agencies, 2) TSA workers are more in the public eye than many other federal employees and 3) TSA has a more streamlined disciplinary process than most agencies,” John Palguta said by e-mail. “So when there are problems they are more easily identified and more quickly dealt with.” He is a Partnership for Public Service vice president who previously worked for the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Office of Personnel Management.
#2
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
TSA has a more streamlined disciplinary process than most agencies,” John Palguta said by e-mail. “So when there are problems they are more easily identified and more quickly dealt with.
#4
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Fortunately, most of the comments rip the TSA to shreds (excepting a couple of AFS types). Unfortunately, by posing this as an "image problem", those comments merely serve to support the thesis that it's an image problem and not a real problem.
#5
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Acknowledging “it obviously hurts our image” during the interview, Pistole said one thing the cases have not done is endanger the flying public. The chances the improper baggage screening has compromised security “is so remote,” he said, given the nearly 1.8 million passengers and 3.4 million bags screened every day by about 50,000 TSAs.
What happened to "we have to be lucky every time"?
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Really? It's more than just "image"....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/....html?hpid=z10
So, it's simply a matter of "the standards are higher for us, so it looks like we're bad" ???
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/....html?hpid=z10
So, it's simply a matter of "the standards are higher for us, so it looks like we're bad" ???
#7
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 156
TSA has a more streamlined disciplinary process than most agencies,” John Palguta said by e-mail. “So when there are problems they are more easily identified and more quickly dealt with.
#8
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
At some point, folks will realize that the two issues are independent of one another. You can have an image problem but not have a real problem. You can have a real problem but not have an image problem. Or, as in this case, you can have both.
#10




Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,301
Streamlined Disciplinary Process
1. It never happened.2. We're investigating but we believe it never happened.
3. Okay, something happened but normal procedures were followed. And we're still trying to locate the video.
Note that the process usually ends here.
(If necessary) 4. We couldn't find the video but it was obviously the passenger's fault.
(If necessary) 5. Maybe the TS"O" did something that wasn't quite SOP but s/he's being retrained.
(Only if the media is still clamoring after a week and someone has actual video)
6. We're sorry if the passenger felt they were treated in an unprofessional manner.For steps 4, 5, and 6, include the following:
"TSA holds its staff to the highest standards of professionalism and this incident (which didn't actually happen and the employee who did it is being retrained) in no way reflects upon the 84,000 other TSA employees who work 19 hour days at minimum wage in hazardous conditions out of the goodness of their hearts just to protect the uncaring American public from the imminent disasters that await them on every single flight blah blah blah." 
I wish I was making this up. Really.

