Interesting tidbits from AFGE newsletters
#121
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,683
Every other nation manages to ensure security without making me personally endure these indiginities and without asking me to put my belongings at similar risk.
#122
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 172
So, where in the world have you found use routine patdowns including hands through hair, hands inside pants, manual contact with breasts and vulvar areas? I travel internationally probably a dozen times a year to Europe and Asia and have never experienced anything like that except in the US. So, where are you referring to?
#123
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
So, where in the world have you found use routine patdowns including hands through hair, hands inside pants, manual contact with breasts and vulvar areas? I travel internationally probably a dozen times a year to Europe and Asia and have never experienced anything like that except in the US. So, where are you referring to?
In the UK, body scanners are mandatory, no opt-out.
But generally not as bad as the US.
#124
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
I have had hands 'float' all over my body, but still never up between my legs into contact with my genitals, never in my pants or the neckline of my shirt. No heavy duty clutching/squeezing/palpating/karate chops to my 'resistance'. Often times hands barely skimming my body while holding a wand.
Much of the time (exiting Europe, for example), it was done at the insistence of TSA. Other times (India), it was done even on internal flights.
Always travel with my bags locked (including carry-on). Never had a checked bag searched outside my presence. Never had someone go into my carry-on without me being right there.
I understand there's no opt-out in the UK, but that the numbers of pax forced through the NoS are far lower than in the US.
Edited to add: new thread about a 17-year-old girl who had her breasts exposed during patdown. She was wearing a sundress and the dress got pulled down while her 'stomach area' was being 'patted'.
That's part of my point: when I'm abroad, I'm actually 'patted' (or very lightly skimmed). I have never experienced the groping, firm sliding/rubbing contact I get here in the US. A 'pat' would not have pulled the girl's dress down.
Last edited by chollie; Nov 20, 2012 at 12:57 pm
#126
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
I (and others here ) do have our facts straight. I am sure there are countries few of us travel to (perhaps Afghanistan, Iran) where security measures are comparable or greater than what passes for 'security measures' in the US (during non-elevated times). They are by far and away the rare exception. Too many folks of this forum travel frequently, around the world, for that nonsense to wash.
I (and others) have pointed out the lack of barking, the respectful treatment, and the absence of groping hands between legs, in pants, in necklines, the deliberate separation of pax and bags at the checkpoint, the inability to lock a bag and know that if it unlocked at the destination, baggage handlers are responsible, not airport security - these are all 'norms' around the world.
Equally, 'say your name', liquid tests in gate waiting areas and BDOs even following pax into airport toilets to continue questioning - those things are not the 'norm' elsewhere.
If you want to extrapolate the harshest experience you have had in unusual circumstances abroad to all or even the majority of experiences abroad, you are just being disingenuous at best or insulting to your readers at worse.
#127
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,595
We can add to the above the fact that in 2007-2008, an internal government study reached the conclusion that passengers weren't the biggest threat to aviation security. that study was never released because it undermined Skeletor and the Kipster's plan to add more oppressive and unnecessary passenger screening such as the ridiculous nudeoscopes - the latter rejected as ineffective by Germany and other countries that haven't lost their sanity when it comes to aviation security.
And let's don't forget that except for the UK, which has succumbed to US-style overreaction, that countries like Norway, Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands manage to deploy airport security measures that are efficient, respectful and low-key - in other words, everything that the TSA can't seem to do here - and the world hasn't come to an end because they don't engage in junk science or irradiate and grope air passengers in their countries.