100 ml = 3 oz?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, MR Gold, HH Gold
Posts: 926
100 ml = 3 oz?
Something I read in another thread just now made me wonder - why, in every other country (at least the ones I've been to) are you allowed 100 ml of liquids, but only 3 ounces in the US? Has anyone had luck traveling with 100 ml liquid containers in the US?
And please, "Because the TSA can't do math" isn't an answer. There must be some sort of explanation, right?
And please, "Because the TSA can't do math" isn't an answer. There must be some sort of explanation, right?
#4




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily(CTA)/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston(IAH)/Red Stick, La.(BTR)/airborne in-between
Programs: United Plat (1MM), AA ExecPlat, ITA/AZ Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG gold
Posts: 3,875
The published TSA rule is 3.4 ounces, however they use their cutesy 3-1-1 campaign to try and get the public to remember their inane rules.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: DL Scattered Smothered Covered Medallion, Some hotel & car stuff, Kroger Plus Card
Posts: 10,805
I find it very rare that TSOs are paying that close attention anyway. I used to regularly travel with toiletry products in bottles around 4 or 4.5 oz. because one product I used didn't come in anything smaller, and they never blinked an eye as long as they were in the quart bag. Even before I had PreCheck I eventually stopped taking out my 3-1-1 bag unless asked, which was maybe once every 15 flights.
#6
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: AA EXP, 2mm; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 325
TSA will let you bring up to 100ml, which is ~3.4 oz. Agree it's rare to be asked to take the 3-1-1 baggie out of your bag (though not doing so gives them an instant "bag check!" excuse if they so desire). It's also rare they notice liquids up to about 4 oz or so that happen to be in the 3-1-1 bag.
Remember, too, that liquids over 100ml can be brought if they're medically necessary.
Remember, too, that liquids over 100ml can be brought if they're medically necessary.
#7
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,220
#9
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
#10
In Memoriam
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
The TSA explanation is here
http://blog.tsa.gov/2009/02/3-oz-or-...hat-gives.html
Some of the many previous threads about it
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...3-4-100ml.html
or
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...-gels-etc.html
or
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...rough-tsa.html
or
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...eckpoints.html
or
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...-oz-100ml.html
http://blog.tsa.gov/2009/02/3-oz-or-...hat-gives.html
Some of the many previous threads about it
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...3-4-100ml.html
or
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...-gels-etc.html
or
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...rough-tsa.html
or
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...eckpoints.html
or
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...-oz-100ml.html
#11




Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,341
Cordelli has replied while I've been looking up links...
In the very early days, the US said "3 ounces" and the rest of the world said "100 ml" which of course are different. Within a few days or weeks, the TSA changed their rule to "3.4 oz" which is (nearly) 100 ml, and officially that's what you're allowed. However, the signs had been printed and the PA announcements recorded to say "3 ounces." Over at the PV (the TSA blog) and here on FT, many people asked why the signs and announcements couldn't be updated, and the consistent answer from TSA (as formalised in this link given by Cordelli) was "it's too hard, it's too expensive, and besides, you all know we really mean 3.4."
(Note that the distinction between fluid ounces and ounces avoirdupois was also too hard, so they ignored it.)
One TSA person who posted here tried to argue that the "real" rule was 3 ounces but they had latitude to allow you up to 3.4 ounces.
No, I never believed that either.
Officially the rule in the US is 3.4 ounces and it's on their website here. There have, however, been reports of individual screeners who claimed that the rule was 3 ounces, and whoconfiscated unilaterally allowed the passenger to voluntarily surrender
a 3.2 or 3.3 ounce liquid. There was even one story of a screener who claimed that a container labeled 3.0 ounces was not allowed because "3.0 is more than just 3" Or this thread, where a 0.25 ounce bottle was confiscated because the screener thought it was 25 ounces.
As with everything else to do with the TSA, if you run into a screener who claims that 3 is the limit and tries to confiscate a 3.2 ounce container, you can try to show them a printout of the website but you'll likely be told that it's out of date or "we don't do it that way here" or "anyone could edit a website printout."
So, tragically, "the TSA can't do math" is one of the genuine answers.
In the very early days, the US said "3 ounces" and the rest of the world said "100 ml" which of course are different. Within a few days or weeks, the TSA changed their rule to "3.4 oz" which is (nearly) 100 ml, and officially that's what you're allowed. However, the signs had been printed and the PA announcements recorded to say "3 ounces." Over at the PV (the TSA blog) and here on FT, many people asked why the signs and announcements couldn't be updated, and the consistent answer from TSA (as formalised in this link given by Cordelli) was "it's too hard, it's too expensive, and besides, you all know we really mean 3.4."
(Note that the distinction between fluid ounces and ounces avoirdupois was also too hard, so they ignored it.)One TSA person who posted here tried to argue that the "real" rule was 3 ounces but they had latitude to allow you up to 3.4 ounces.
No, I never believed that either.Officially the rule in the US is 3.4 ounces and it's on their website here. There have, however, been reports of individual screeners who claimed that the rule was 3 ounces, and who
a 3.2 or 3.3 ounce liquid. There was even one story of a screener who claimed that a container labeled 3.0 ounces was not allowed because "3.0 is more than just 3" Or this thread, where a 0.25 ounce bottle was confiscated because the screener thought it was 25 ounces.As with everything else to do with the TSA, if you run into a screener who claims that 3 is the limit and tries to confiscate a 3.2 ounce container, you can try to show them a printout of the website but you'll likely be told that it's out of date or "we don't do it that way here" or "anyone could edit a website printout."
So, tragically, "the TSA can't do math" is one of the genuine answers.
#12




Join Date: May 2006
Location: MYF/CMA/SAN
Programs: COdbaUA MM, AA EXP, AF G, Bonbon Gold, Hilton G, All G, GHA Titanium, Hertz PC, Avis Presidential
Posts: 5,929
As said, it was about a week after the introduction of the Freedom Baggie that the US realized that, not only were Europeans getting hosed, but that lots of products in the US are sized primarily in metric.
#15




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily(CTA)/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston(IAH)/Red Stick, La.(BTR)/airborne in-between
Programs: United Plat (1MM), AA ExecPlat, ITA/AZ Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG gold
Posts: 3,875




