Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Another security lapse in Newark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 11:50 am
  #16  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,984
Originally Posted by tkey75
If she fails at what is probably the simplest of tasks - make sure everyone walks in this direction, not that direction - how can she be trusted for something more challenging?
Maybe it would help TSOs who perform this function to stay awake and on task if they were required to ask each exiting pax to say his/her name.

As for Sen. Lautenberg and his concerns about sterile area exits, perhaps he has stock or financial interests in a company that can install glass boxes to isolate exiting pax until the monitoring TSO hits a release button. For our safety, of course.

I wouldn't be surprised to see taxpayers funding over-priced one-person-wide exit lane restrictions in the future, to simplify the task of the monitoring TSO.
chollie is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 1:35 pm
  #17  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: DL MM Gold
Posts: 1,687
Originally Posted by ralfp
Don't they have alarms that go off when people enter through the exit?
They exist, and probably cost less than one $screener-month$ to install . They aren't at all lanes at all airports probably because Chertoff doesn't lobby for those companies.

But the presence of the motion-enforcing sensors (SAN has some also) still has to be backstopped by a human security presence. Or is it the sensors backstop the human? Either way, if a SINGLE screener without motion sensors as backup can be so easily distracted, then that layer of security is as penetrable as cheesecloth and might as well not exist.

But shhhh, don't talk about it or else the bad guys might find out.

Originally Posted by chollie
I wouldn't be surprised to see taxpayers funding over-priced one-person-wide exit lane restrictions in the future, to simplify the task of the monitoring TSO.
Guarded by the ancient invention of the TURNSTILE!
TheRoadie is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 2:51 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Originally Posted by chollie
Maybe it would help TSOs who perform this function to stay awake and on task if they were required to ask each exiting pax to say his/her name.
.
As is typical of govt job assignments, no particular skill set is matched to the person. It's just a title pulled out of a hat. Then money has to be spent to fix the problem. Let's not help them with any ideas.
tkey75 is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 3:23 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 733
Originally Posted by chollie
...

As for Sen. Lautenberg and his concerns about sterile area exits, perhaps he has stock or financial interests in a company that can install glass boxes to isolate exiting pax until the monitoring TSO hits a release button. For our safety, of course.
I've seen such a device at SFO. I believe in Terminal 1 (?) there is a solitary TSA employee that stands there with a tensabarrier across the exit, similar to what makes up the queues leading to a ticket counter. When I've seen it in action, it will stand there until a group of people amasses, and then make a dramatic show of releasing people from the "sterile" area to the outside, unsafe world full of potential terrorists.

Originally Posted by chollie
I wouldn't be surprised to see taxpayers funding over-priced one-person-wide exit lane restrictions in the future, to simplify the task of the monitoring TSO.
And I've already seen worse here.

At MEM they appear to be reconfiguring the main checkpoint (leading into Terminal B, for those who care). They have put up a solid, floor-to-ceiling wall for an exit lane that is approximately 4-foot wide, probably enough for 2 people side-by-side to exit. There are generally 2 TSA employees standing on each end of this new hamster tunnel, for a total of 4, to control entrance and egress through the exit lane. It's effing insane.
barbell is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 11:08 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Silicon Valley
Programs: UA GS, WN A-List, AA Exec Plat, National Emerald
Posts: 1,021
I'm sure she was just chit-chatting with another TSA employee, probably with a cup of hot, steaming coffee in her hand, ready to throw in the face of anyone who confronts her.

You wonder how many people walk past snoozing TSA workers each day and are not detected.
reamworks is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 11:15 pm
  #21  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by barbell
There are generally 2 TSA employees standing on each end of this new hamster tunnel, for a total of 4, to control entrance and egress through the exit lane. It's effing insane.
It's not so insane when you think of it as a program to insure jobs for the otherwise unemployable.

It's no less stupid, though.
Caradoc is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 11:21 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SDF
Programs: Delta PM, IC Ambassador, Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,195
I'm waiting for the day where we see a "Newark success thread."
SomeGuy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.