Community
Wiki Posts
Search

No WTMD option

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 4:22 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 646
No WTMD option

deleted for privacy

Last edited by littlesheep; Jan 17, 2012 at 8:46 pm
littlesheep is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 4:36 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Programs: DL MM, DL DM, Marriott PP
Posts: 561
TSA is pushing hard to make NOS the only available option. I have heard that from TSO's at many airports.
MAMOHT is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 4:43 pm
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,964
Originally Posted by MAMOHT
TSA is pushing hard to make NOS the only available option. I have heard that from TSO's at many airports.
I know many TSOs don't like doing the patdowns, but even when the WTMD is eliminated, there will still be 'involuntary medical patdowns' - folks who are incapable, for whatever reason, of assuming and holding the position long enough to get a clear NoS scope.

Some of us are capable of using the WTMD (balance issues, palsy, unable to raise and hold arms over the head (John McCain), ostomy bags - when the WTMD isn't an option, we're all going to be subjected to the grope.
chollie is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 5:42 pm
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
And it takes more employees to run the strip-search machines or do gropes. And now that the agency is unionized there's even less incentive to operate efficiently with less employees.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 8:43 pm
  #5  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by littlesheep
At JFK, WTMD roped off, everyone forced through the cancer box.

When I asked why I can't go through the WTMD, TSA said: "you can, but then you will be patted down".

Say what?

I completely realize that they try to force people to be radiated, and if you opt out you get sexually assaulted, but since when does walking through the WTMD result in an automatic assault? I thought WTMDs were the safe option - that you're less likely to be groped if you get them.

I haven't flown for a long time (see "TSA sexual assault") so did I miss this point?
Bolding mine:. And my response would be "fine with me, let's do it"
goalie is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 8:55 pm
  #6  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,612
Originally Posted by chollie
I know many TSOs don't like doing the patdowns, but even when the WTMD is eliminated, there will still be 'involuntary medical patdowns' - folks who are incapable, for whatever reason, of assuming and holding the position long enough to get a clear NoS scope.
There will still be patdowns even if they only use NoS. I've had partial pat-downs several times when forced to use the NoS--apparently the small necklace I wear looks suspicious, or my watch band (remember when they insisted everyone remove their watches to use the NoS?!). Even some clothes have resulted in post-NoS patdowns for me--pocket apparently too baggy, for example.

Mind you, I'm pretty good at self-selecting away from the NoS, but at airports where they're only using the NoS and I don't have an extra 20 minutes to kill, I do get stuck with them at times.
exerda is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 10:14 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ATL/BOS
Posts: 331
During the first half of 2011, there were a few times where I did see that the WTMD was roped off and the NOS was the only option. (BOS and SRQ come to mind.) Lately, now that the NOS has been in regular use for a longer period of time, I think TSA is figuring out that, with the exception of slow times, the best way to run the checkpoint is to keep the WTMD open for overflow when the NOS gets backed up. In other words, use the NOS as the default screening device, but send one or two people through the WTMD when the NOS has a line of a certain number of people (the threshold has been different at every airport). With this method, all but a few people go through the NOS. I think this method is what's in store for us in the near future. The trick to going through the WTMD is all about timing.

I think the current setup up of WTMD/NOS combos are here to stay for the next few years. I think it will be a while before WTMDs are removed and we get double NOS lanes.
skidv25 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 12:42 am
  #8  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 659
I am really curious about MAMOHT's comment. Has the TSA asked airports with body scanners to make that the only option but allowed them to have discretion? Who at a checkpoint makes the decisions for whether to allow the WTMD to remain available as an option?
guflyer is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 6:22 am
  #9  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Programs: DL MM, DL DM, Marriott PP
Posts: 561
I wish I knew the answer. I'm 6'4" and I'm never sent through WTMD regardless of the length of the line. I always (almost) ask the TSO why and a mostly it does not come out in a nice way. The answer is usually the same and they tell me that NOS is the primary device now and some told me that WTMD would go away completely soon enough. As much as I do not want that to happen I actually believe it will.
MAMOHT is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 6:53 am
  #10  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: LGA
Programs: Double Unobtainium, Grace L. Ferguson Airline & Storm Door Co.
Posts: 155
Originally Posted by MAMOHT
TSA is pushing hard to make NOS the only available option. I have heard that from TSO's at many airports.
And didn't TSA say that NOS was for "secondary screening only"? True, that was several (hundred) lies ago...
Vidiot is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 9:01 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
Originally Posted by goalie
Bolding mine:. And my response would be "fine with me, let's do it"
Ditto. "Great, I LOVE the patdowns!'

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 11:01 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Originally Posted by skidv25
During the first half of 2011, there were a few times where I did see that the WTMD was roped off and the NOS was the only option. (BOS and SRQ come to mind.) Lately, now that the NOS has been in regular use for a longer period of time, I think TSA is figuring out that, with the exception of slow times, the best way to run the checkpoint is to keep the WTMD open for overflow when the NOS gets backed up. In other words, use the NOS as the default screening device, but send one or two people through the WTMD when the NOS has a line of a certain number of people (the threshold has been different at every airport). With this method, all but a few people go through the NOS. I think this method is what's in store for us in the near future. The trick to going through the WTMD is all about timing.

I think the current setup up of WTMD/NOS combos are here to stay for the next few years. I think it will be a while before WTMDs are removed and we get double NOS lanes.
I agree. The TSA has carefully crafted the debate to a trade between doing anything they want as long as you can get through the checkpoint "quickly." A lot of people, including some FTers, have bought that spin hook, line, and sinker. The TSA can't go 100% Cancer Box because they know it would choke most checkpoints and make lines agonizingly long. That would make the focus of the anger that the Cancer Boxes are causing long lines. The TSA must keep the lines moving in order to continue to implement all of the draconian measures they have in place (amd more).
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 11:43 am
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,964
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
And it takes more employees to run the strip-search machines or do gropes. And now that the agency is unionized there's even less incentive to operate efficiently with less employees.
+1. Not to mention, NoS is slower than WTMD, so they'll need more stations open to handle the lines (with a corresponding increase in manpower, of course).
chollie is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 11:44 am
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 646
deleted

Last edited by littlesheep; Jan 17, 2012 at 8:55 pm
littlesheep is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 12:41 pm
  #15  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Programs: DL MM, DL DM, Marriott PP
Posts: 561
Unfortunately, it is not your choice what to go through. It is "the chooser" that directs the traffic towards one or another device. What they meant was that in you case you could go through WTMD but only to get a pat down and WTMD was simply a way of going around NOS.
MAMOHT is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.