Opt out = Red flag
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Opt out = Red flag
My ex traveled with my son over the holiday out of BWI and SLC. I had told them about the NoS, in particular that I didn't want our son going thru them.
She talked to TSA at BWI about it and she mentioned "opt out" and they're like "Don't say that up there ... we treat that as a red flag. Say anything but that."
I found that interesting that they seem to be treating "opt outs" as trouble makers. Doesn't surprise me really, but that's the first time I've heard that. Saying like "I'd rather not" seemed less "offensive" to them.
Any of you hear about anything like that?
Super
She talked to TSA at BWI about it and she mentioned "opt out" and they're like "Don't say that up there ... we treat that as a red flag. Say anything but that."
I found that interesting that they seem to be treating "opt outs" as trouble makers. Doesn't surprise me really, but that's the first time I've heard that. Saying like "I'd rather not" seemed less "offensive" to them.
Any of you hear about anything like that?
Super
#2
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AUS
Posts: 690
That sounds inaccurate.
I opt out of the X-ray scanners (due to a family history of skin cancer) and have yet to encounter a problem. They just do a patdown instead.
What your ex may have misunderstood is that (if I understand correctly) if you don't explicitly say I opt out then you haven't actually opted out. So if I tell the TSA I have a family history of skin cancer, I haven't opted out but if I say I opt out then I have opted out.
(I usually say I need to opt out just to be polite.)
The red flag language might be someone's second-hand explanation of that.
I opt out of the X-ray scanners (due to a family history of skin cancer) and have yet to encounter a problem. They just do a patdown instead.
What your ex may have misunderstood is that (if I understand correctly) if you don't explicitly say I opt out then you haven't actually opted out. So if I tell the TSA I have a family history of skin cancer, I haven't opted out but if I say I opt out then I have opted out.
(I usually say I need to opt out just to be polite.)
The red flag language might be someone's second-hand explanation of that.
#3
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
That sounds inaccurate.
I opt out of the X-ray scanners (due to a family history of skin cancer) and have yet to encounter a problem. They just do a patdown instead.
What your ex may have misunderstood is that (if I understand correctly) if you don't explicitly say I opt out then you haven't actually opted out. So if I tell the TSA I have a family history of skin cancer, I haven't opted out but if I say I opt out then I have opted out.
(I usually say I need to opt out just to be polite.)
The red flag language might be someone's second-hand explanation of that.
I opt out of the X-ray scanners (due to a family history of skin cancer) and have yet to encounter a problem. They just do a patdown instead.
What your ex may have misunderstood is that (if I understand correctly) if you don't explicitly say I opt out then you haven't actually opted out. So if I tell the TSA I have a family history of skin cancer, I haven't opted out but if I say I opt out then I have opted out.
(I usually say I need to opt out just to be polite.)
The red flag language might be someone's second-hand explanation of that.
I'm flying in a few weeks so maybe I'll just ask during my massage.
#6
Moderator: Manufactured Spending



Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,707
I think what they meant is that "I opt out" is more confrontational and it might trigger a power struggle. "I can't go through the scanner" is more amicable.
In other words, the TSO might give a more thorough pat-down to someone he/she perceives as opting out in order to send a message or cause trouble, and just a cursory pat-down to someone who is perceived to have a legitimate reason in their eyes.
In other words, the TSO might give a more thorough pat-down to someone he/she perceives as opting out in order to send a message or cause trouble, and just a cursory pat-down to someone who is perceived to have a legitimate reason in their eyes.
#7
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
I think what they meant is that "I opt out" is more confrontational and it might trigger a power struggle. "I can't go through the scanner" is more amicable.
In other words, the TSO might give a more thorough pat-down to someone he/she perceives as opting out in order to send a message or cause trouble, and just a cursory pat-down to someone who is perceived to have a legitimate reason in their eyes.
In other words, the TSO might give a more thorough pat-down to someone he/she perceives as opting out in order to send a message or cause trouble, and just a cursory pat-down to someone who is perceived to have a legitimate reason in their eyes.
Either statement should also be followed by "and I will need to move to a position where I can watch my belongings." And then do so. Whatever you say, it should be stated in a businesslike manner, even-toned and said with confidence that comes from a proper knowledge of the situation.
#8
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
My ex traveled with my son over the holiday out of BWI and SLC. I had told them about the NoS, in particular that I didn't want our son going thru them.
She talked to TSA at BWI about it and she mentioned "opt out" and they're like "Don't say that up there ... we treat that as a red flag. Say anything but that."
I found that interesting that they seem to be treating "opt outs" as trouble makers. Doesn't surprise me really, but that's the first time I've heard that. Saying like "I'd rather not" seemed less "offensive" to them.
Any of you hear about anything like that?
Super
She talked to TSA at BWI about it and she mentioned "opt out" and they're like "Don't say that up there ... we treat that as a red flag. Say anything but that."
I found that interesting that they seem to be treating "opt outs" as trouble makers. Doesn't surprise me really, but that's the first time I've heard that. Saying like "I'd rather not" seemed less "offensive" to them.
Any of you hear about anything like that?
Super
.
#9
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
#11
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
#12
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,961
I'm a charter member of the 'involuntary medical opt-out club' - I'm physically unable to assume and hold the position necessary.
Most of the time, when I'm directed to the NoS and I explain that I'm physically unable to assume the necessary stance, the response is "So you're opting out?" or (shouting or talking into some kind of radio (?) device) "Opt-out".
I originally used the words 'opt out' myself, but I found that in some instances, that clearly indicated to the TSO that I was some kind of trouble-maker. It always resulted in a lengthy bag check, as well as a grope. In other instances, it led to a pointless attempt to convince me of the safety of the device - pointless, because I can't assume and hold the position so there's no way to get a clear scan.
Most of the time, when I'm directed to the NoS and I explain that I'm physically unable to assume the necessary stance, the response is "So you're opting out?" or (shouting or talking into some kind of radio (?) device) "Opt-out".
I originally used the words 'opt out' myself, but I found that in some instances, that clearly indicated to the TSO that I was some kind of trouble-maker. It always resulted in a lengthy bag check, as well as a grope. In other instances, it led to a pointless attempt to convince me of the safety of the device - pointless, because I can't assume and hold the position so there's no way to get a clear scan.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 121
I thought the TSA technically required the phrase "I opt out"?
After the sneaky New Year's Eve signing of the NDAA, I suppose it did just get a little bit more dangerous to opt out, so maybe the screener was informed and somewhat helpful. Kind of like points on your license now, too many red flags and you get disappeared.
Not that that would keep me from opting out.
Not that I'm even more inclined to stop boycotting flying in TSA airspace.
After the sneaky New Year's Eve signing of the NDAA, I suppose it did just get a little bit more dangerous to opt out, so maybe the screener was informed and somewhat helpful. Kind of like points on your license now, too many red flags and you get disappeared.
Not that that would keep me from opting out.
Not that I'm even more inclined to stop boycotting flying in TSA airspace.


