Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Opt out = Red flag

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 9:42 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Opt out = Red flag

My ex traveled with my son over the holiday out of BWI and SLC. I had told them about the NoS, in particular that I didn't want our son going thru them.

She talked to TSA at BWI about it and she mentioned "opt out" and they're like "Don't say that up there ... we treat that as a red flag. Say anything but that."

I found that interesting that they seem to be treating "opt outs" as trouble makers. Doesn't surprise me really, but that's the first time I've heard that. Saying like "I'd rather not" seemed less "offensive" to them.

Any of you hear about anything like that?

Super
Superguy is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 10:09 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AUS
Posts: 690
That sounds inaccurate.

I opt out of the X-ray scanners (due to a family history of skin cancer) and have yet to encounter a problem. They just do a patdown instead.

What your ex may have misunderstood is that (if I understand correctly) if you don't explicitly say I opt out then you haven't actually opted out. So if I tell the TSA I have a family history of skin cancer, I haven't opted out but if I say I opt out then I have opted out.

(I usually say I need to opt out just to be polite.)

The red flag language might be someone's second-hand explanation of that.
Moriens is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 11:00 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by Moriens
That sounds inaccurate.

I opt out of the X-ray scanners (due to a family history of skin cancer) and have yet to encounter a problem. They just do a patdown instead.

What your ex may have misunderstood is that (if I understand correctly) if you don't explicitly say I opt out then you haven't actually opted out. So if I tell the TSA I have a family history of skin cancer, I haven't opted out but if I say I opt out then I have opted out.

(I usually say I need to opt out just to be polite.)

The red flag language might be someone's second-hand explanation of that.
Maybe. I always just say opt out and have gotten the standard harassment. BWI D gates tend to be a bit more roguish so what she said didn't surprise me given the retaliation I've gotten there in the past (most notably for the TSA wants to see me naked shirts).

I'm flying in a few weeks so maybe I'll just ask during my massage.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 11:01 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
It sounds like someone who isn't being a good little sheep. The TSA hates that.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 12:04 am
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 487
Getting "flagged" by the clerks in blue is not something I would be afraid of.
OxonCantab is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 1:38 am
  #6  
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,707
I think what they meant is that "I opt out" is more confrontational and it might trigger a power struggle. "I can't go through the scanner" is more amicable.

In other words, the TSO might give a more thorough pat-down to someone he/she perceives as opting out in order to send a message or cause trouble, and just a cursory pat-down to someone who is perceived to have a legitimate reason in their eyes.
cbn42 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 6:44 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by cbn42
I think what they meant is that "I opt out" is more confrontational and it might trigger a power struggle. "I can't go through the scanner" is more amicable.

In other words, the TSO might give a more thorough pat-down to someone he/she perceives as opting out in order to send a message or cause trouble, and just a cursory pat-down to someone who is perceived to have a legitimate reason in their eyes.
Either statement should be fine, but it is sad that their own SOP language is considered potentially confrontational. It says I have the right to opt out. I should be able to say that without recourse.

Either statement should also be followed by "and I will need to move to a position where I can watch my belongings." And then do so. Whatever you say, it should be stated in a businesslike manner, even-toned and said with confidence that comes from a proper knowledge of the situation.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 7:58 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by Superguy
My ex traveled with my son over the holiday out of BWI and SLC. I had told them about the NoS, in particular that I didn't want our son going thru them.

She talked to TSA at BWI about it and she mentioned "opt out" and they're like "Don't say that up there ... we treat that as a red flag. Say anything but that."

I found that interesting that they seem to be treating "opt outs" as trouble makers. Doesn't surprise me really, but that's the first time I've heard that. Saying like "I'd rather not" seemed less "offensive" to them.

Any of you hear about anything like that?

Super
Using the 'opt out' wording marks you as a Flyertalker and therefore ipso facto a troublemaker in the eyes of the TSA. Or domestic terrorist, if you prefer .
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 10:11 am
  #9  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
Using the 'opt out' wording marks you as a Flyertalker and therefore ipso facto a troublemaker in the eyes of the TSA. Or domestic terrorist, if you prefer .
Proud to be a member.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 10:15 am
  #10  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: YUL
Posts: 2,116
I just say something like: "I'll be one of your 'Male assist, no alarm' candidates today". That makes their eyes pop....
okazon69 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 10:16 am
  #11  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by okazon69
I just say something like: "I'll be one of your 'Male assist, no alarm' candidates today". That makes their eyes pop....
^^^^^ gotta try that.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 12:30 pm
  #12  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by okazon69
I just say something like: "I'll be one of your 'Male assist, no alarm' candidates today". That makes their eyes pop....
Good one ^ and yes, I'm gonna try that one as well
goalie is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 12:46 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA: 1K, HH: Diamond
Posts: 1,330
That's bull. I opt out all the time. It's a clean, efficient, phrase. Who cares if the TSA doesn't like it? It's their job to do it anyway.
deirdre is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 12:58 pm
  #14  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,961
I'm a charter member of the 'involuntary medical opt-out club' - I'm physically unable to assume and hold the position necessary.

Most of the time, when I'm directed to the NoS and I explain that I'm physically unable to assume the necessary stance, the response is "So you're opting out?" or (shouting or talking into some kind of radio (?) device) "Opt-out".

I originally used the words 'opt out' myself, but I found that in some instances, that clearly indicated to the TSO that I was some kind of trouble-maker. It always resulted in a lengthy bag check, as well as a grope. In other instances, it led to a pointless attempt to convince me of the safety of the device - pointless, because I can't assume and hold the position so there's no way to get a clear scan.
chollie is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 12:59 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 121
I thought the TSA technically required the phrase "I opt out"?

After the sneaky New Year's Eve signing of the NDAA, I suppose it did just get a little bit more dangerous to opt out, so maybe the screener was informed and somewhat helpful. Kind of like points on your license now, too many red flags and you get disappeared.

Not that that would keep me from opting out.
Not that I'm even more inclined to stop boycotting flying in TSA airspace.
CelticPax is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.