Chat Down at DTW
#46
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
In other words, speaking English is now a requirement to travel freely (e.g., without unreasonable searches) in the US. All hail the providers of security theater at all costs.
#47
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
You're not wrong, exactly, just a few years out of date. Here's the way it goes in 2011:
1. There is a constitutional difference between an "administrative" search and a "criminal" search. Except that Congress said to TSA "make sure 9/11 doesn't happen again, we don't care how" and walked away. Also, the Constitution is apparently DOA.
[Snipped good stuff right on the money.]
1. There is a constitutional difference between an "administrative" search and a "criminal" search. Except that Congress said to TSA "make sure 9/11 doesn't happen again, we don't care how" and walked away. Also, the Constitution is apparently DOA.
[Snipped good stuff right on the money.]
#48
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,795
#49
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Up in the air far too often.
Programs: Star Gold
Posts: 354
#51
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,617
The last time I was at IAD, the clerk played that game with a teenager who was traveling with his mother. I was standing right behind them, and visibly registered my disgust. I think the clerk was going to play the same game with me, but thought better of it.
#52
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: boca raton, florida
Posts: 621
#53
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
I would like to add to #1, and IANAL. There is no "Constitutional" administrative search. It was carved out by the courts in the 1960's for totally unrelated reasons and has been expanded and applied far beyond the courts original intention. Subsequent opinions have added to the scope and breadth of the administrative search to the point that TSA feels everything it does applies under various interpretations and the 4th amendment is inoperative at their CP. The phrase "Administrative Search" is used to effectively silence its critics.
Administrative search contradicts the black and white language of the 4th Amendment. You don't need to be a lawyer to understand what that Amendment means--it is uncommonly clear. If people want to get rid of it, fine, get rid of it by amending it out. That requires a vote.
There are good solutions and bad solutions and allowing this violation of a basic right guarantees a bad solution that results in granny strip searches. If the limits of the 4th are respected, you will only get good solutions that everyone can live with.
#54
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Outstanding answer. "Where are you going," will get, "I'm going to XYZ, as it says on my boarding pass. Why, can you recommend a good restaurant?," unless I'm going to Las Vegas, in which case the answer will be, "Pahrump. I want to check out the buffets."
Mike
#55
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
No, it isn't because of the word "unreasonable". It says that searches are permitted unless they're "unreasonable". That can mean a lot of things, including "doesn't have a reason". So you most certainly do need to understand a lot of cases to understand what the 4th Amendment means!
#56
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,967
I was shouted at many times in English (because, you know, shouting English louder makes someone who doesn't speak the language suddenly understand) The TDC finally gave up on me and began to shriek at and bully the Japanese and the Koreans behind me.
Nice final departure memory of their US trip, I am certain...
#57
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
No, it isn't because of the word "unreasonable". It says that searches are permitted unless they're "unreasonable". That can mean a lot of things, including "doesn't have a reason". So you most certainly do need to understand a lot of cases to understand what the 4th Amendment means!
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Everything after the semi-colon defines what makes it reasonable.
But, that is my opinion and since IANAL, my opinion is of little or no value.
#58
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
No, it isn't because of the word "unreasonable". It says that searches are permitted unless they're "unreasonable". That can mean a lot of things, including "doesn't have a reason". So you most certainly do need to understand a lot of cases to understand what the 4th Amendment means!
No sane person in our country could possibly conclude that it is reasonable to require people to take off their clothes (with or without aid of machines) or require them to allow agents to feel their sexual organs and private parts, to conduct those types of searches on people who have not occasioned such a search other than by the fact that they are transiting onto some mode of transportation.
You cannot get around the fact that such searches are offensive and unreasonable to passengers. The TSA's "reasons" for wanting this does not replace the standard by which the people affected are judging this.
Clearly, we think it is unreasonable.
Last edited by nachtnebel; Dec 7, 2011 at 10:02 pm Reason: typo
#59
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 516
But I could be wrong, maybe one of the resident TSOs can answer -- What happens if the passenger either doesn't understand English, or is unable to respond verbally to questions due to a disability?
#60
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 821
I suppose the inability to understand English earns you the same thing as a speech block, and that is an enhanced grope and additional paws in all of your stuff, with a special trip to a private room should the magic swab machine throw up a false positive.
But I could be wrong, maybe one of the resident TSOs can answer -- What happens if the passenger either doesn't understand English, or is unable to respond verbally to questions due to a disability?
But I could be wrong, maybe one of the resident TSOs can answer -- What happens if the passenger either doesn't understand English, or is unable to respond verbally to questions due to a disability?