Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

TSO William Touzani fired by TSA for having displayed collage in workplace

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSO William Touzani fired by TSA for having displayed collage in workplace

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2011, 5:27 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
This is the same guy that wrote the books and did several different posters, right? Yeah, Screeners and virgins, and Confessions of a Rogue screener. The letter of termination is actually more detailed than some I have seen. This is a fairly easy boot considering the 14 day suspension in the same calendar year. We will see what comes of it, and whether he will appeal it.
gsoltso is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 5:56 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
Unless the DFSD has also sacked every screener who has groped children, abused the elderly or disabled, or confiscated harmless items from passengers under threat of missing their flight, this is not "cleaning house", this is just a little light dusting.
^^
IslandBased is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 6:19 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by tsadude1
You guys should send a thank you letter to the DFSD for cleaning house.
Why? He's just doing his job.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 7:28 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by gsoltso
This is the same guy that wrote the books and did several different posters, right? Yeah, Screeners and virgins, and Confessions of a Rogue screener. The letter of termination is actually more detailed than some I have seen. This is a fairly easy boot considering the 14 day suspension in the same calendar year. We will see what comes of it, and whether he will appeal it.
Just saw your signature. Cute.

But, now I have my response: "What part of 'I do not talk to BDO's' are you not getting?"

And for the firing, deserved just for the books, and I am surprised he lasted this long. In industry, he would have had his personal items handed to him in a box long ago.

Lesson learned. Criticize the TSA, get the boot. Abuse passengers, get retrained.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 8:53 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
Just saw your signature. Cute.

But, now I have my response: "What part of 'I do not talk to BDO's' are you not getting?"

And for the firing, deserved just for the books, and I am surprised he lasted this long. In industry, he would have had his personal items handed to him in a box long ago.

Lesson learned. Criticize the TSA, get the boot. Abuse passengers, get retrained.
I agree with you that writing and publishing the books (not for SSI, I did not really read them all that intently, but I didn't see any earth shattering SOP disclosures), and indicating that TSA profiled a specific group of people just because they were that people - that has not been my experience over the last 7 years. I can't say that it has never happened, but I have not been instructed like that (standardized training actually states the opposite), nor have I seen it be employed where I was working.
gsoltso is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 10:51 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Originally Posted by gsoltso
I agree with you that writing and publishing the books (not for SSI, I did not really read them all that intently, but I didn't see any earth shattering SOP disclosures), and indicating that TSA profiled a specific group of people just because they were that people - that has not been my experience over the last 7 years. I can't say that it has never happened, but I have not been instructed like that (standardized training actually states the opposite), nor have I seen it be employed where I was working.
Yes, and "Nobody I know voted for Nixon!"

The high school I attended had a drug problem. It was a MAJOR drug problem. There was a lot of product going through that school, on a daily basis, the entire 4 years I attended. In those 4 years, I saw it first-hand only once. But during my senior year, some Jump Streeters came to the school, and drug arrests were made on school grounds at the rate of 1-3 per week through the entire school year.

Just because you don't see something happening doesn't mean it isn't there. Sometimes it just means that you aren't part of it; sometimes it means you're wearing blinders; sometimes it means you're intentionally turning a blind eye.
WillCAD is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 11:15 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by goalie
Wow!!!!!!

But imho, there has to be more to it (2nd offense, 3rd offense, etc) or is the TSA actually now holding by their zero tolerance policy?
What makes you think TSA is only now "holding by their zero tolerance policy"?

But yes, from what he himself has post, and what was cited in this letter, he had other offenses. This guy deserved to be fired.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 11:19 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 93
Originally Posted by Mr. Elliott
He will probably appeal it and get rehired, it is almost impossible to terminate a federal employee, unless it was a criminal action that was the cause of the termination.

Mr. Elliott
You really only display your lack of knowledge of the federal personnel practice here. My agency/office has terminated a number of people in the recent past for less than criminal conduct. It's not very hard to do if the supervisor does the job right.

In the case in question it's probably 50-50 but the insubordination charge (charge 2) is serious and can be hard to reverse.
fendertweed is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 11:33 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 842
I believe every TSO should be dismissed based on the following quote from the termination letter:

"As a TSO, you are held to high standards of conduct and professionalism. You are required to conduct yourself in a manner that does not adversely reflect on TSA, negatively impact its ability to discharge its mission, cause embarrassment to the agency, or cause the public or TSA to question your reliability, judgment, or trustworthiness."
a7800 is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 12:55 pm
  #25  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by SATTSO
Originally Posted by goalie
Wow!!!!!!

But imho, there has to be more to it (2nd offense, 3rd offense, etc) or is the TSA actually now holding by their zero tolerance policy?
What makes you think TSA is only now "holding by their zero tolerance policy"?

But yes, from what he himself has post, and what was cited in this letter, he had other offenses. This guy deserved to be fired.
Fair enough so let's just say that under Pistole's reign, there appears to be more openness about terminations ^ vs under "previous administrations" where all the public ever heard were things like "the TSA takes these matters very seriously and appropriate action will be taken" or "the TSO has been designated for re-training" and etc tho more often than not (imho), none were terminated and back on duty. Now in this particular situation, if there were previous offenses, then yes, this TSO in question goes bye-bye.
goalie is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 5:55 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Runway 22 @ KROC
Posts: 706
Originally Posted by RunsWithScissors
From the letter....


And Alvin Crabtree, who brought a firearm to work, and caught by one of his co-workers, is still employed.
Are we really surprised?
United_727 is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 7:21 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LAX/CWA/TOA/AUW
Programs: Mileage Plus, SW Rewards, WorldPerks, Barnes and Noble Frequent Buyers
Posts: 368
I also considered your disciplinary history. In March 2011, you served a fourteen (14) day suspension for failure to follow procedures and failure to protect Sensitive Security Information (SSI). Additionally,I note that you were counseled in March 2003 for making inappropriate remarks about another co-worker in the workplace. Therefore, I consider your disciplinary history to be an aggravating factor.
Gee he had 2 disciplinary actions in 8 years. I worked with people who were written up several times a quarter and they maintained their jobs.
AirlineBrat53 is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 8:52 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by AirlineBrat53
Gee he had 2 disciplinary actions in 8 years. I worked with people who were written up several times a quarter and they maintained their jobs.
But, more importantly, the more severe disciplinary action (resulting in the 14-day suspension) was only mere months before the final incident. That, to me, is more significant than the event 8 years prior.
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2011, 10:45 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,332
Originally Posted by United_727
Are we really surprised?
Yes, this is real surprised for him.

Originally Posted by AirlineBrat53
Gee he had 2 disciplinary actions in 8 years. I worked with people who were written up several times a quarter and they maintained their jobs.
Right, he had a several warning before but, he won't listen to his manager & supervisor, too. He had a many chance to kept his job but, unfortunately, he was fired from TSA. His behavior is not good at all. This is not acceptable for his behavior. He will no longer work for TSA. He will barred frmo TSA office and do don't go near airport property. He could be arrested for that. He could get charge as trespassing.
N830MH is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2011, 12:24 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 576
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
Why? He's just doing his job.
Lets just say that Dallas was previously full of problem children and had a few FSDs who didnt do their jobs. The newest upper management is taking no prisoners.
tsadude1 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.