Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TDC Computer Idea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 4:04 pm
  #16  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,888
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
If you can swing being a prior Secretary of DHS I'm sure TSA would give you a contract for such a device. Wouldn't even have to work well.
Wouldn't even have to work at all.

Just has to be sufficiently profitable for the right folks.
chollie is online now  
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 7:03 pm
  #17  
Moderator: Chase Ultimate Rewards
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 2P, MR LT Plat, IHG Plat, BW Dia, HH Au, Avis PC
Posts: 5,664
Sigh.

Yet another idea to waste millions of $ fighting a boogeyman. A well-reasoned idea, and yet still yet another waste.

Only a really dumb terrorist would try to get a weapon directly through the checkpoint. A WTMD and baggage x-ray will catch those dumb terrorists. Anyone more sophisticated will use any of dozens of much easier ways to smuggle in an explosive.

So why are planes not blowing up? Could it be that... just maybe... there are not terrorists around every corner?

Two (barely) credible "attacks" in ten years. And we spend billions each year to implement methods that do not make even those few attacks less likely.

There are so many better ways to use that money. Even directly related to travel.

With those billions wasted, we could easily - easily - install breathalyzer-based ignition locks in the cars of EVERY convicted drunk driving offender. A conservative estimate is that such a move would save about 3900 lives each year! And, shockingly, it would be less damaging to civil liberties...

No, the real point to all of this is a disgusting truth: The TSA gauntlet is not, in any way, about saving lives. It is about bureaucracy protecting itself at any cost. And it is just as much about the cowardice of a society past its prime.
MDtR-Chicago is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 7:13 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OOL/DOH
Programs: QF LTS WP, Avis Pres Club, HH Diam.
Posts: 3,190
why not just tattoo a bar code on everyone's forehead at birth, simple bar code readers at each checkpoint - no need for clerks at all...
VH-RMD is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 7:20 pm
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WAS
Programs: AMEX Platinum, Global Entry, Priority Pass, SPG Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 1,594
Originally Posted by MDtR-Chicago
With those billions wasted, we could easily - easily - install breathalyzer-based ignition locks in the cars of EVERY convicted drunk driving offender. A conservative estimate is that such a move would save about 3900 lives each year! And, shockingly, it would be less damaging to civil liberties...
I think that statement is essential to understanding how the public perceives air travel. While risk is extremely low, people still possess an illogical fear of all things aviation. These same people can then ignore legitimate risks in other areas of life. This all attests to how humans are unable to logically access risk. Sadly this deficiency is too often exploited.
14940674 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 7:28 pm
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,888
Originally Posted by VH-RMD
why not just tattoo a bar code on everyone's forehead at birth, simple bar code readers at each checkpoint - no need for clerks at all...
Nah...they'd still have to grope your hairline to make sure you hadn't had a face transplant...
chollie is online now  
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 8:02 pm
  #21  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,287
Originally Posted by 14940674
On the other hand, since, as has been said many a time, people commit crimes, rather than weapons, isn't their some value to ensuring that the ID provided by travelers is authentic, so we know that they are, as Dennis Green would say, who we thought they were?
If this Dennis Green person shows up at the checkpoint with an ID document, who is he?

Dennis Green the former Minnesota Vikings coach?

Or Dennis Green the Australian Olympic canoer?

Maybe Dennis Green, the General Manager, Jazz 88.3 KCCK?

Or Dennis Green the Hollywood camera and electrical contractor?

There are 997 people in the USA named Dennis Green. So how do you REALLY tell that someone whose ID document says they're "Dennis Green" is "who they say they are"?

But mostly, yeah, what MDtR-Chicago said. ^
RadioGirl is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 8:05 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 353
Originally Posted by chollie
Nah...they'd still have to grope your hairline to make sure you hadn't had a face transplant...
Protip: Try reading chollie's post immediately after watching "Repo! The Genetic Opera".

You'll like it, promise.
celticwhisper is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.