Oh I'm well aware. I've been sexually assaulted by Blue Shirts a number of times and I'm certain that i've travelled far more than about 95% of these sexual assailants.


btw, The term Blue Shirt has nothing to do with Nazi'ism. It has to do with the uniform that some people wear and their lack of humanity for doing what they do for a little bit of money.

That's because they still have a little bit of humanity left.

Their reluctance is because they know its wrong and immoral.

It's a very good thing they didn't standardize on BROWN!

THE BAD NEWS:
The ones with humanity will quit and find other work.
The ones that stay are the ones we will have to deal with.:mad::mad:

And they will be dealt with - by the courts, when we force political action to outlaw their sexual deviancy at the airport. We will see them disgraced and imprisoned, and we'll see it codified into law that they were wrong so they can never claim that their punishment was undeserved, and we'll see that all punishments against TSOs are meted out by the justice system so they can never claim that we just wanted revenge. We will give them a choice - quit now or go to prison where who-knows-what will happen to them (because, again, the murderers and rapists...you know, their kinsfolk...with whom they'll be sharing living space are unlikely to care about the difference between TSO and LEO: "pigs" are "pigs" to them) and when their choice is made they will endure the consequences of that choice.

Write your elected officials. Never stop writing. Call, fax, E-mail, talk to newspapers, call in to radio shows, make sure that it's unequivocal political suicide for anyone in Washington to support TSA and then the TSOs WILL be dealt with. Legally, so that any of them who try to take revenge on any of us will incur even more penalties.

Not enough to stop them, we have to CRUSH them and do it above-board, by the book and on the up-and-up so there's no way out.

I don't know about that. Maybe so, maybe not. Until TSA changes the procedure, my job is to make sure they are screening correctly. After all, isn't that what you're "paying" me to do?

Wirelessly posted (Treo: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; en-us; Nexus One Build/GRI40) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1)

But violence against passengers is just fine, huh?

Nope. Never said that.

Wanna try again?

Sexual assault is violence.

Just because some operatives call it "standard screening" doesn't make it any less so.

Denial is a powerful tool. Without denial, facism wouldn't be possible.

Quite frankly, I would feel safer knowing the guy sitting next to me on a plane had assaulted a TSA screener. At least he would be likely to be of some use in case a would-be terrorist tried something.

I'm paying you somewhere between nothing and zero. I don't fly, so I don't pay the taxes you're leeching. And I will continue to not fly commercial carrier until TSA is disbanded and you and 60K+ of your fellow leeches are sitting on a street corner with a cardboard sign and a plastic cup.

then from the lack of the clerks ability to get the rules consistently right, I would suggest the US taxpayers are entitled to a refund.

You realize that TSA gets money from other taxpayer sources besides airline taxes, right? Those body and luggage scanners were paid for out of the 2009 Recovery Act (the "stimulus") for a mere $1 billion.

But that's not salary, that's capital equipment. And I would prefer stimulus money to go to that than to ship guns to Mexican drug cartels for the sole purpose of blaming gun dealers, but it's a close call.

Bart

I completely understand. You have to reason with yourself to be able to do what you do for a living and still be able to sleep unless you are person without any shread of morals which I doubt because you seem like a decent fellow.

It isn't violence or assault against passengers... it is a basic legal screening method for our safety

It isn't cancer or radiation those machines are spilling out... it is harmless and essential to catch "bad people" like the underwear bomber

It isn't your testicles/labia I am touching... it is your resistance or sensitive areas.

It isn't a waste of tax dollars or manpower... it is a very important layer of security to trip up terrorists that can't pronounce their names.

Like I said Bart, I totally get it. If I was forced to do what you guys do for a living and steal and molest people for no increase in security I would believe your little mantra too.

I would cling to 35 year old Supreme court cases on administrative searches when trying to justify a pat down on a child trying to come home from their disney vacation.

I would cite passenger privacy and other "options" when removing the depends off of the incontenent elderly

Above all else I would make sure that all pat downs are being down as invasively as possible. After all if I wasn't able to intimidate the passenger through the AIT machine then I better make sure the process is retalitory so he doesn't think to question my directives next time.

After all that appears to be what you are saying and condoning.

But god forbid any passengers get fed up and protect themselves. Make sure those get the full front of the hand down the shorts private pat down everytime. It is probably best that those are mandatory private screenings, if the public knew what you guys did during those searches they would really have a sh!t fit.