Which F Class
Jun 21, 2005 | 1:43 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA 1K, AA Plat Pro, Marriott Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,100
Which F Class
I have the choice to fly in F class on a 747 or a 340-300. I will be flying with my brother so we dont need to be right next to each other but it wouldnt hurt. I am not familiar with CX's planes, but are all the F class seats the same? (As opposed to other airlines where some planes have the "good" first class and others do not). Thanks for any advice!
Jun 21, 2005 | 2:53 pm
#2
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SFO/OAK
Programs: AA/EXP 3MM; UA/1K; HY/DIA; SPG/PLT; Fairmont/Life PLT
Posts: 2,232
One number: 747.
Even though CX wants you to believe all F product is created equal, it is not.
Of all the aircrafts with F service, 333, 343, and 747, the 747 gives you by far the best F experience. It is true for all carriers with F cabin in the forward part of the 747......
Enjoy CX F...
Even though CX wants you to believe all F product is created equal, it is not.
Of all the aircrafts with F service, 333, 343, and 747, the 747 gives you by far the best F experience. It is true for all carriers with F cabin in the forward part of the 747......
Enjoy CX F...
Jun 21, 2005 | 4:52 pm
#4
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
The F suite is identical on all long-haul CX aircraft. So is the service. The 747 has its good and bad points (not really worth going into here), and it really is misleading to say that it is better than the A343 or A346 service in any substantive way. I say that after having dozens of flights on both types and having sat in just about every seat in every F configuration. There are 12 F seats on the 747 vs 8 on the A343/346 so there is more square footage and open space, but it isn't like most other airlines that do have different service levels on different routes. Pick the route and time that suits you (or more to the point, where there is seat availability).
Jun 21, 2005 | 5:12 pm
#5
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 175
I've flown the A340 in F from SFO to HKG as well as the 747 from LAX to HKG a few times and I totally agree that the 747 experience is much better than the A340.
The biggest difference IMO, is that there is less foot traffic going past you on the 747 F whereas on the A340 the crew, both from F and C cabins, seem to walk up and down the aisle all the time. Also, I've noticed that sometime the crew would talk quite loudly when they are in the forward galley on the A340.
The biggest difference IMO, is that there is less foot traffic going past you on the 747 F whereas on the A340 the crew, both from F and C cabins, seem to walk up and down the aisle all the time. Also, I've noticed that sometime the crew would talk quite loudly when they are in the forward galley on the A340.
Jun 21, 2005 | 5:47 pm
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
Originally Posted by uclabruin82
I have the choice to fly in F class on a 747 or a 340-300. I will be flying with my brother so we dont need to be right next to each other but it wouldnt hurt. I am not familiar with CX's planes, but are all the F class seats the same? (As opposed to other airlines where some planes have the "good" first class and others do not). Thanks for any advice!
All of CX F seats are the same. The 747 F cabin is significantly larger with 12 seats while the 333/343 F cabin is much smaller with only 8 seats.
Jun 22, 2005 | 4:05 am
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,729
Originally Posted by Pook
I've flown the A340 in F from SFO to HKG as well as the 747 from LAX to HKG a few times and I totally agree that the 747 experience is much better than the A340.
The biggest difference IMO, is that there is less foot traffic going past you on the 747 F whereas on the A340 the crew, both from F and C cabins, seem to walk up and down the aisle all the time. Also, I've noticed that sometime the crew would talk quite loudly when they are in the forward galley on the A340.
The biggest difference IMO, is that there is less foot traffic going past you on the 747 F whereas on the A340 the crew, both from F and C cabins, seem to walk up and down the aisle all the time. Also, I've noticed that sometime the crew would talk quite loudly when they are in the forward galley on the A340.
Jun 22, 2005 | 1:01 pm
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB PLT again afater a decade as plebian
Posts: 22,938
The 747 cabin is so much more spacious. Walls don't curve in as much as on Airbus a/c particularly in the front (not that it matters that much in FC other than you're seated at economy seat's width away from the window) and ceiling is higher (not as much as in the back, or in 777s). Being in the nose means there's no noise or traffic up front (1A and 1K) are great unless people specifically want to go there. Also, the FC lav is on the right side of the 343 so you have to go through one of the galleys to get to it if seated on the left.
Jun 22, 2005 | 7:15 pm
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
Originally Posted by terenz
Also, the FC lav is on the right side of the 343 so you have to go through one of the galleys to get to it if seated on the left.
Jun 22, 2005 | 8:06 pm
#10
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
Originally Posted by christep
Er, there are two FC lavs on the 340 - one on the left past the galley, just before the cockpit, and one on the right between the galley and the cabin.
Jun 22, 2005 | 9:27 pm
#11
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,729
Originally Posted by number_6
And that, in a nutshell, illustrates the attention to detail and accuracy of information on FT -- both good and bad. To be fair some captains close off the cockpit lav, particularly when the crew rest area is in use, but that is quite rare and usually it is available for use.
Jun 22, 2005 | 9:43 pm
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
Well it has never been a problem for me (as a Brit); specifically in the last month there was not a murmur when I used it on a 346 JFK-HKG and a 34D HKG-SIN.
Could it be that the crew feels that Americans want to hear this because then they will believe that the homeland is more secure?
Could it be that the crew feels that Americans want to hear this because then they will believe that the homeland is more secure?
Last edited by christep; Jun 22, 2005 at 9:50 pm
Jun 22, 2005 | 10:16 pm
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,729
Originally Posted by christep
Well it has never been a problem for me (as a Brit); specifically in the last month there was not a murmur when I used it on a 346 JFK-HKG and a 34D HKG-SIN.
Could it be that the crew feels that Americans want to hear this because then they will believe that the homeland is more secure?
Could it be that the crew feels that Americans want to hear this because then they will believe that the homeland is more secure?
Jun 22, 2005 | 10:44 pm
#15
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MNL, South Florida, YYZ
Programs: CX Diamond, AA Exec Plat, AC Super Elite, DL Plat, NW Gold, CO Gold Elite, BA Gold, PR Elite,
Posts: 231
All I can add to this topic is that the bulkhead (row 1) seat on any 747 is quite cold. I had no choice but to sit in 1K on Sat from LAX-HKG and I froze. I have alot of mile on CX and more mile on many many other carriers and as one purser once told me.... "If it's not boeing....? I'm not going!!!"