![]() |
Originally Posted by QRC3288
(Post 36531779)
Out of curiosity, why do you find 77K as a downgrade?
I find the current iteration of the Cirrus J seats on the A350 far better too, especially with the increased legroom, both in the cubicle in front and on the side. On the 77K/77A, only the bulkhead seats have a wider footrest, and even there, there’s no additional space on the sides. In Y, the 3-3-3 configuration on the A350 is far superior to the 3-4-3 layout on the 77K. |
Other European routes:
MXP 77G AMS 35K CDG 359 (a bit surprising, might get updated) ZRH 359 MAD 359 |
Hard to believe they will still put 359 to CDG and ZRH, CDG still had a 77A this summer, that would be big drop in capacity, used to be double daily 77A and 359 before covid
Mad had 35K last winter and it was often hard to get a seat in J last minute |
I am also taking a flight from HKG to BKK next January, and for the updated winter schedule do 777 and A330 still have lie flat on this route? The seat map on my reserv shows 2-2-2 configuration.
|
Originally Posted by FlyEurope
(Post 36531849)
IMHO both the aircraft and the seat (at least in J) are better on the A350. The A350 has significantly lower cabin pressure and higher air humidity compared to the 777. As a result, I tend to arrive feeling much more rested.
I find the current iteration of the Cirrus J seats on the A350 far better too, especially with the increased legroom, both in the cubicle in front and on the side. On the 77K/77A, only the bulkhead seats have a wider footrest, and even there, there’s no additional space on the sides. In Y, the 3-3-3 configuration on the A350 is far superior to the 3-4-3 layout on the 77K. |
Originally Posted by pvgman
(Post 36531923)
Hard to believe they will still put 359 to CDG and ZRH, CDG still had a 77A this summer, that would be big drop in capacity, used to be double daily 77A and 359 before covid
Mad had 35K last winter and it was often hard to get a seat in J last minute |
Originally Posted by FlyEurope
(Post 36531876)
Other European routes:
MXP 77G AMS 35K CDG 359 (a bit surprising, might get updated) ZRH 359 MAD 359 |
im guessing one reason of CDG being A359 is because CX already updated it to a A359 in earlier months, when this route should have first class, and maybe CDG has less passengers in winter, not to mention fierce competition
another reason is 777 refits. |
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 36532313)
im guessing one reason of CDG being A359 is because CX already updated it to a A359 in earlier months, when this route should have first class, and maybe CDG has less passengers in winter, not to mention fierce competition
another reason is 777 refits. |
Ugh...thats lame...regional 330 with 121 seats got changed to 777 with 232 seats
Hate those 232 seating |
Originally Posted by VE105
(Post 36532253)
may I know how you distinguish 359 vs 35K? CX timetable page from 1 or 2 month before (irritatingly) no longer shows 359 or 35K, only "A350".
Originally Posted by FlyEurope
(Post 36531876)
Other European routes:
MXP 77G AMS 35K CDG 359 (a bit surprising, might get updated) ZRH 359 MAD 359
Originally Posted by Steven013
(Post 36532096)
I am also taking a flight from HKG to BKK next January, and for the updated winter schedule do 777 and A330 still have lie flat on this route? The seat map on my reserv shows 2-2-2 configuration.
|
I'm guessing CDG has no F demand. I think it's the worst performing EU route for CX
|
my monthly CX156 (BNE-HKG) now 77A across to March. PEY gets a toilet i dont mInd it
|
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 36533479)
I'm guessing CDG has no F demand. I think it's the worst performing EU route for CX
|
Originally Posted by Felix Felicis
(Post 36533762)
I was on this flight two weeks ago, return HKG-CDG-HKG. CX261/260. 77A. Flight was full in all classes. Used BUG, and F full (6/6) both outbound and return. Just one data point, but looked very busy....
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:37 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.