So much for SFO...
#1
Original Poster



Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Left Coast
Programs: BA Gold for Life, SQ PPS Club, UA Gold 2MM
Posts: 99
I’m not real happy with my “favorite airline” at the moment. After stressing out over the status of my SIN-HKG-SFO July 1 repatriation tickets for the last few months, I was happy to see first that CX added SFO back to their schedule from late June a week or so ago, and shortly thereafter the HK government lifted the transit ban. So all good, right? I even spoke to CX last week and everything was go.
For some reason I checked the website again today and looked for a new booking on that routing for July 1 to see how full PE was and thus my odds of getting a free bump to business class. Lo and behold, the flight was gone, yet I hadn’t received any message from CX.
So I called in again today, and they explained that SFO has been removed for all of July! The change was made a few days ago, but they didn’t bother to contact ticketed passengers and said they would only do so within two weeks of departure. Which of course would leave very little time to arrange substitute flights at a reasonable cost.
Fortunately, it worked out OK - I was able to cancel CX and re-booked on JL via NRT for about the same cost, and I’m supposed to get the refund from CX. I’m guessing they didn’t like the load factors to SFO and pulled the plug, but it was only a few weeks after they added it back to the schedule. That and the fact I was not notified of the change despite holding a ticket, and only found out because I called them. I appreciate they are going through tough times, but this isn’t a great way to retain customer loyalty.
Moreover, to be fair, SQ just did the exact same thing to my wife and daughter’s tickets on the same day. Also with no notification. I managed to get them on the LAX flight and will route them to SFO on my own. No idea why both airlines bothered to put SFO back in their schedules, only to pull it out again a week or so later. So for those headed to the US on either carrier, LAX remains the only game in town.
For some reason I checked the website again today and looked for a new booking on that routing for July 1 to see how full PE was and thus my odds of getting a free bump to business class. Lo and behold, the flight was gone, yet I hadn’t received any message from CX.
So I called in again today, and they explained that SFO has been removed for all of July! The change was made a few days ago, but they didn’t bother to contact ticketed passengers and said they would only do so within two weeks of departure. Which of course would leave very little time to arrange substitute flights at a reasonable cost.
Fortunately, it worked out OK - I was able to cancel CX and re-booked on JL via NRT for about the same cost, and I’m supposed to get the refund from CX. I’m guessing they didn’t like the load factors to SFO and pulled the plug, but it was only a few weeks after they added it back to the schedule. That and the fact I was not notified of the change despite holding a ticket, and only found out because I called them. I appreciate they are going through tough times, but this isn’t a great way to retain customer loyalty.
Moreover, to be fair, SQ just did the exact same thing to my wife and daughter’s tickets on the same day. Also with no notification. I managed to get them on the LAX flight and will route them to SFO on my own. No idea why both airlines bothered to put SFO back in their schedules, only to pull it out again a week or so later. So for those headed to the US on either carrier, LAX remains the only game in town.
#2




Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: HKG
Programs: Marriott Ambassador (Titanium Lifetime), BA GfL, EK Gold, HH Diamond, Ex-BD*G
Posts: 3,745
Not wanting to be an apologist, and appreciate you'd like a place to rant.. I'd take a view that at least CX refunded your cash, no voucher problems unlike everyone's fav.... This is not a good time to be an airline, but I'm pleased that you have an alternative option that can still earn you tier points on oneworld
. I think if you really want to fly Cathay then Vancouver would be an option (except the Canadian border is closed...!), or as you say LAX is more likely, and is a lovely drive down highway one, especially since hiring cars is essentially a route to bankruptcy 
(but thanks for posting)
. I think if you really want to fly Cathay then Vancouver would be an option (except the Canadian border is closed...!), or as you say LAX is more likely, and is a lovely drive down highway one, especially since hiring cars is essentially a route to bankruptcy 
(but thanks for posting)
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PVG, FRA, SEA, HEL
Programs: UA Premier Gold
Posts: 4,783
Airlines are just interested to grab fresh cash - and then cancel the flights if loads are light.
This was to be expected - some people would fall for this trick, incl. you.
This was to be expected - some people would fall for this trick, incl. you.
#4
Original Poster



Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Left Coast
Programs: BA Gold for Life, SQ PPS Club, UA Gold 2MM
Posts: 99

And yes, littlevoices, it was a bit of a rant...
#5


Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,435
The SFO flight is still there. CX872 depart on 1st July 0045am from HKG. Not sure what is your original flight though.
But the problem is that the flight from SIN CX636 arrive at 0015am on 1st July. So can’t make the connecting flight. Thus CX is not selling this connection.
And for SQ, they did not reinstate SFO at all. So far, they have been sending email to paxes for official cancellation around 21 days before the flight. Although they did announce that most flight are cancelled before that.
But the problem is that the flight from SIN CX636 arrive at 0015am on 1st July. So can’t make the connecting flight. Thus CX is not selling this connection.
And for SQ, they did not reinstate SFO at all. So far, they have been sending email to paxes for official cancellation around 21 days before the flight. Although they did announce that most flight are cancelled before that.
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PVG, FRA, SEA, HEL
Programs: UA Premier Gold
Posts: 4,783
Fortunately, it worked out OK - I was able to cancel CX and re-booked on JL via NRT for about the same cost, and I’m supposed to get the refund from CX.
I'd take a view that at least CX refunded your cash, no voucher problems unlike everyone's fav
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PVG, FRA, SEA, HEL
Programs: UA Premier Gold
Posts: 4,783
Forgive me for falling for such an obvious “trick”, rube that I am - I’ve only flown five million miles in my career! And I should have been much smarter to avoid those nasty airlines and booked trans-pacific passage on a tramp steamer, right?
#8


Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: YYZ,YYC,YUL,YVR,LAX,SFO
Programs: Aeroplan SE. BA-Gold
Posts: 699
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAX
Posts: 11,594
airlines have no control over government decisions to close or open borders - they try to plan under assumption of travel restarting but i believe HK just extended the lock by 3 more months today...
#10




Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: AS AA
Posts: 211
I booked a CX flight ex SFO in late July, so I have been tracking the inventory. Early last week CX still listed 3 daily for sale for the month of July. On Wednesday they zeroed out CX851 and CX879, and changed CX873 to 3 weekly. As I was booked on CX851, I had been wishing they could remove those phantom flights out of schedule so that I could rebook. This morning I received an email from Cathay saying my flight has been changed to CX873, a day earlier. EF shows CX879 still on schedule and CX851 gone.
Cathay really should get rid of those flights with zero inventory in order for people to rearrange travel ASAP.
Cathay really should get rid of those flights with zero inventory in order for people to rearrange travel ASAP.
#11




Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,934
Forgive me for falling for such an obvious “trick”, rube that I am - I’ve only flown five million miles in my career! And I should have been much smarter to avoid those nasty airlines and booked trans-pacific passage on a tramp steamer, right? 
And yes, littlevoices, it was a bit of a rant...

And yes, littlevoices, it was a bit of a rant...
#12
Original Poster



Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Left Coast
Programs: BA Gold for Life, SQ PPS Club, UA Gold 2MM
Posts: 99
b. I booked these CX flights almost 6 months ago - it’s a family repatriation, not a pleasure trip. Our visas are expiring in Singapore, so we can’t just hang out here as long as we like.
c. Even when flying in Business class, I don’t like the 16-hour nonstop from SIN to either LAX or SFO - much prefer to break up the trip. And this one won’t be in Business.
But at this stage, I’ll fly whoever I can get so long as I can rely on it operating on July 1. So hopefully JL won’t cancel like CX and SQ did.
#13
Original Poster



Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Left Coast
Programs: BA Gold for Life, SQ PPS Club, UA Gold 2MM
Posts: 99
The problem is that the website cannot keep up with the schedule changes, even days later, it appears.
#14


Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,435
dont think this is correct. I guess the zero out the past few days have something to do with the transit. CX mention that they are adjusting some of the schedule so as to fit in more transit. So guess they zero out first.
For example SIN-HKG flight have been bring forward to arrive at 2245 hrs in HKG in July so as to connect to SFO n other flights.
Right now you can book SIN-HKG-SFO on 3/July 5/July on CX.
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PVG, FRA, SEA, HEL
Programs: UA Premier Gold
Posts: 4,783
airlines have no control over government decisions to close or open borders - they try to plan under assumption of travel restarting but i believe HK just extended the lock by 3 more months today...
Again, I am defending my position -> airlines need fresh cash to finance their operations (esp. lease payments for the planes). They'll do anything to achieve that, even selling for tickets, where everyone knows that they will be cancelled eventually.
So basically do not fly for pleasure until 2021 to avoid getting played...
a. I actually prefer flying Cathay. SQ is a pretty good backup option, but being OW Emerald seems to get me better treatment even though I’m PPS as well.
If you need to move your family from SIN to SFO due to visa issues, I'recommend to monitor the situation and book only flights at a very short notice.

