![]() |
Originally Posted by tphuang
(Post 28569689)
It seemed like the J seats were a little smaller than the ones on 77W or maybe I'm imagining it.
|
Originally Posted by tphuang
(Post 28569689)
It seemed like the J seats were a little smaller than the ones on 77W or maybe I'm imagining it.
|
Originally Posted by 1010101
(Post 28569814)
You are not. The seat is slightly smaller, due to the aircraft itself being slightly smaller than a 77W.
|
Flying in December JFK-HKG...itinerary was recently switched from 777 to 350...flying in J
|
Originally Posted by Devyan1
(Post 28570766)
Flying in December JFK-HKG...itinerary was recently switched from 777 to 350...flying in J
|
Originally Posted by KrazyTrain18
(Post 28570876)
Could you provide a few more details, are you connecting through YVR or SFO ?
Sorry about that |
Originally Posted by Devyan1
(Post 28570939)
My mistake...it's actually the second leg...HKG-MEL will now be on the 350
Sorry about that |
Originally Posted by hightide
(Post 28570078)
In this case would the CX889 on 77W be preferable to CX855 on A359 in J as A359 seats are smaller?
|
Originally Posted by hightide
(Post 28570078)
In this case would the CX889 on 77W be preferable to CX855 on A359 in J as A359 seats are smaller?
IF all else was equal, I'd do A350 in a heartbeat. It's the best J class on CX for sure and now that I'm getting used to CX planes with WiFi, it sucks when you don't have it. CX's A350 WiFi is just damn good. It's nearly on par with what I've had on that JetBlue "Mint" business class thing. (Only flown once, but I remember it had very good wifi). CX's A350 wifi beats SQ, QR, JL and EK, whom I'm familiar with. However, a) if you're going for an F upgrade with miles, that is only possible on CX889, and b) CX889 YVR-HKG is just fantastic for sleeping. Depart, watch a brief show, doze off, conk out, sleep 9 hours, breakfast time before landing, full day upon arrival. The US late night departures (SFO, LAX, JFK, EWR, BOS) are just a bit too long flying time to be as perfect as YVR. Obviously the A350 is a daytime departure so different animal. |
Originally Posted by FlyerTalkUserName
(Post 28570119)
The CX A350 was my first reverse herringbone J product and this must be why I was so unimpressed with the seat compared to the rave reviews reverse herringbones usually get. I'm 6'3" 230 and didn't find it that comfortable. Maybe one day I'll get a chance to compare to the 77W.
The advantage of the A350 seat is the design and feature improvements over the old version. |
EWR to become A350
Schedule loaded as of October 29th, 2017
|
Originally Posted by maortega15
(Post 28632450)
Schedule loaded as of October 29th, 2017
|
Originally Posted by KrazyTrain18
(Post 28632468)
Well that will finally stop those who kept saying A359 wouldn't make sense to east coast NA
|
Originally Posted by KrazyTrain18
(Post 28632468)
Well that will finally stop those who kept saying A359 wouldn't make sense to east coast NA
|
Nice upgrade for EWR in my opinion.
35G is a clear-cut upgrade over 77G. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:20 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.