Rumor: MPC will go way of PPS
#211
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
Speaking about ASEAN, another point need to be look also. I believe Indonesia contributes quite significantly to SQ. With the raising of GA, which offer non-stop service to Aussie, and North Asia (HKG, PVG, PEK, NRT/HND), I bet somehow it erotes SQ market shares.
Not to mention the ME carrier, which now offering direct service to CGK from their ME hub, makes traveling from CGK to Europe as 1 stop service, compare to 2 stops service when they are transiting in SIN en route to their ME hub. With this fact and normally cheaper fare compare to SQ, many Indonesian travelers have switched from SQ to these ME carriers.
I guess SQ has bigger headache on competition compare to CX.
Not to mention the ME carrier, which now offering direct service to CGK from their ME hub, makes traveling from CGK to Europe as 1 stop service, compare to 2 stops service when they are transiting in SIN en route to their ME hub. With this fact and normally cheaper fare compare to SQ, many Indonesian travelers have switched from SQ to these ME carriers.
I guess SQ has bigger headache on competition compare to CX.
#212
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,810
And how will MPC help CX maintain its market share?
I suspect if CX prices some tickets at 30,000 for pek-hkg business return and then gives the pax 25K in Apple gift cards, they'd get more PRC business travel.
I suspect if CX prices some tickets at 30,000 for pek-hkg business return and then gives the pax 25K in Apple gift cards, they'd get more PRC business travel.
#213
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HKG, VCE, CAN
Programs: CX MPO
Posts: 585
Another article today on the SCMP. Basically it is confirmed ufficially that CX is revising the whole MPO/AM approach, and any change will be implemented starting from next year.
#214
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver
Programs: CX DM, SQ TPP, QF GO LIFE, OZ*G LIFE, Marriott TIT LIFE, WOH GLOBALIST LIFE, HH DM, BA GO LIFE
Posts: 598
#216
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
The SCMP comment sounds like the same boilerplate that AgencyGuy has shared with us.
#217
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/a...r-major-review
Actually it does add something new:
If the article is believable, it claims CX will make Asiamiles a pure earn-n-burn problem (redeeming flights and upgrades), but MPO will be the one that offers lounge access, and priority boarding.
Again, if the article is right, it may look something like this:
Everyone has an Asiamiles account, but it exists only for you to earn miles and burn them.
There will be a second, associated, MPO account that to advance in tiers have revenue-based restrictions. And based on your tiers you get the extra benefits associated with flying such as check-in, boarding, etc.
Actually it does add something new:
If the article is believable, it claims CX will make Asiamiles a pure earn-n-burn problem (redeeming flights and upgrades), but MPO will be the one that offers lounge access, and priority boarding.
Again, if the article is right, it may look something like this:
Everyone has an Asiamiles account, but it exists only for you to earn miles and burn them.
There will be a second, associated, MPO account that to advance in tiers have revenue-based restrictions. And based on your tiers you get the extra benefits associated with flying such as check-in, boarding, etc.
#218
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,810
I'm being totally cynical here
But if Cathay disqualifies certain BIS flyers such as QRC3288, forcing them into another program say AA's, wouldn't that be slightly good news for people who manufacture substantially all of their miles such as myself?
I'm assuming QRC3288 and others like him will credit both their FQTS and FQTV miles both to [AA], meaning there are less Asia Miles in issue and less competition for T+360/waitlisted flights.
But if Cathay disqualifies certain BIS flyers such as QRC3288, forcing them into another program say AA's, wouldn't that be slightly good news for people who manufacture substantially all of their miles such as myself?
I'm assuming QRC3288 and others like him will credit both their FQTS and FQTV miles both to [AA], meaning there are less Asia Miles in issue and less competition for T+360/waitlisted flights.
#219
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-EP, TK-*G, HL-DM, HY-GLO, MR-LTP
Posts: 25,932
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/a...r-major-review
Actually it does add something new:
If the article is believable, it claims CX will make Asiamiles a pure earn-n-burn problem (redeeming flights and upgrades), but MPO will be the one that offers lounge access, and priority boarding.
Again, if the article is right, it may look something like this:
Everyone has an Asiamiles account, but it exists only for you to earn miles and burn them.
There will be a second, associated, MPO account that to advance in tiers have revenue-based restrictions. And based on your tiers you get the extra benefits associated with flying such as check-in, boarding, etc.
Actually it does add something new:
If the article is believable, it claims CX will make Asiamiles a pure earn-n-burn problem (redeeming flights and upgrades), but MPO will be the one that offers lounge access, and priority boarding.
Again, if the article is right, it may look something like this:
Everyone has an Asiamiles account, but it exists only for you to earn miles and burn them.
There will be a second, associated, MPO account that to advance in tiers have revenue-based restrictions. And based on your tiers you get the extra benefits associated with flying such as check-in, boarding, etc.
#220
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,810
#221
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/a...r-major-review
Actually it does add something new:
If the article is believable, it claims CX will make Asiamiles a pure earn-n-burn problem (redeeming flights and upgrades), but MPO will be the one that offers lounge access, and priority boarding.
Again, if the article is right, it may look something like this:
Everyone has an Asiamiles account, but it exists only for you to earn miles and burn them.
There will be a second, associated, MPO account that to advance in tiers have revenue-based restrictions. And based on your tiers you get the extra benefits associated with flying such as check-in, boarding, etc.
Actually it does add something new:
If the article is believable, it claims CX will make Asiamiles a pure earn-n-burn problem (redeeming flights and upgrades), but MPO will be the one that offers lounge access, and priority boarding.
Again, if the article is right, it may look something like this:
Everyone has an Asiamiles account, but it exists only for you to earn miles and burn them.
There will be a second, associated, MPO account that to advance in tiers have revenue-based restrictions. And based on your tiers you get the extra benefits associated with flying such as check-in, boarding, etc.
#222
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
I'm being totally cynical here
But if Cathay disqualifies certain BIS flyers such as QRC3288, forcing them into another program say AA's, wouldn't that be slightly good news for people who manufacture substantially all of their miles such as myself?
I'm assuming QRC3288 and others like him will credit both their FQTS and FQTV miles both to [AA], meaning there are less Asia Miles in issue and less competition for T+360/waitlisted flights.
But if Cathay disqualifies certain BIS flyers such as QRC3288, forcing them into another program say AA's, wouldn't that be slightly good news for people who manufacture substantially all of their miles such as myself?
I'm assuming QRC3288 and others like him will credit both their FQTS and FQTV miles both to [AA], meaning there are less Asia Miles in issue and less competition for T+360/waitlisted flights.
In the years I spend less, I can still easily qualify for DM as it stands now. In those other years, I could get "Titanium", but I would need to be proactive and really skip my travel on other carriers which I still do from time to time. Obtaining "Titanium" every single year will require effort, whereas obtaining DM for me does not.
These last 6 years, it has been an absolute no-brainer for me (IMO) to book to MPC/AM because I am DM, I live in HKG, I have consistency in my travel, and the soft service is, by and large, outstanding on CX and KA towards DMs. There are some serious weaknesses - lounge overcrowding and terrible earn/burn (and increasingly difficult to burn in the first place), but I put up with it because I get consistently superior soft product service as a result of being CX's highest tier year in and year out. Selfishly, I wish CX would just make DM harder to obtain - maybe 120k miles plus some spending minimum over a certain number of years - or even made DM 150k miles and some spending minimum. I don't know the $ yet they're considering, but if they do it every 12 months rolling and choose a # high enough ($50k USD) then I won't be able to do it every year, and I'd rather bail entirely than have one year on, one year off, etc.
To me, CX is doing what they think they have to do, and it's a very serious decision. Frequent flier programs are at the core of airline marketing strategies. If CX's program is uncompetitive, as I've said before here, I think they are being downright foolish and will pay for it in their revenue line. CX is already going to earn the business of every investment banker in Hong Kong whether or not MPC is "good" or "bad" program. High salaries does not translate into travel discretion. And CX is already going to earn the business of wealthy travelers who don't care about frequent flier programs anyway. CX will lose, however, those travelers who value the mileage program and have discretion over their own travel spend. I really don't know what kind of constituency we are. But count me as one traveler who flies premium classes, cares about getting the best "value" out of a mileage program, and has absolute discretion over where I spend my money.
Handing out Amex DM and GO told me a lot. The decline of my ability to burn miles has, over time, worn old. A silly marketing promotion in SFO two years ago gave me a good idea of how CX thinks about lounge crowding High "Klout" score gets you entry to Cathay Pacific SFO lounge).
The reason I stay loyal is because DM is absolutely an incredible soft-service experience and I have amazing predictability with CX/KA when I travel. If I will have that predictability one year (as "Titanium"), but not the next (maybe I spend less the second year, and only earn "Diamond"), the value of that predictability is lost. In that case, I'd rather just go somewhere where I can accumulate miles at a much faster pace.
#223
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Asia Pac
Programs: AA UA DL AS CXDM JL NH Hilton Hyatt Marriott SPG IHG
Posts: 545
Rumor: MPC will go way of PPS
I guess the rationale behind this new revenue based tiers is to drive more revenue spend for their loyal customers and to not alienate those that do not spend as much to still be willing to fly CX even if it means no status for them.
Under this scenario, those last minute purchases of any class or any non-restricted fares or pure J/F flyers would be their target for the new elite tiers. And those that mostly travel on less AM accrual lower priced tickets would probably start to see only AM accrual rather than MPO qualification.
At the end of the day, everyone still gets to earn/burn their AM, but only those that contribute certain amount of revenue would be granted status.
This is what I would do if I run the airlines!
Under this scenario, those last minute purchases of any class or any non-restricted fares or pure J/F flyers would be their target for the new elite tiers. And those that mostly travel on less AM accrual lower priced tickets would probably start to see only AM accrual rather than MPO qualification.
At the end of the day, everyone still gets to earn/burn their AM, but only those that contribute certain amount of revenue would be granted status.
This is what I would do if I run the airlines!
#224
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/a...r-major-review
If the article is believable, it claims CX will make Asiamiles a pure earn-n-burn problem (redeeming flights and upgrades), but MPO will be the one that offers lounge access, and priority boarding.
Again, if the article is right, it may look something like this:
Everyone has an Asiamiles account, but it exists only for you to earn miles and burn them.
There will be a second, associated, MPO account that to advance in tiers have revenue-based restrictions. And based on your tiers you get the extra benefits associated with flying such as check-in, boarding, etc.
If the article is believable, it claims CX will make Asiamiles a pure earn-n-burn problem (redeeming flights and upgrades), but MPO will be the one that offers lounge access, and priority boarding.
Again, if the article is right, it may look something like this:
Everyone has an Asiamiles account, but it exists only for you to earn miles and burn them.
There will be a second, associated, MPO account that to advance in tiers have revenue-based restrictions. And based on your tiers you get the extra benefits associated with flying such as check-in, boarding, etc.
#225
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 109
I'm a possibility to bail given my suspicions. I'm in a situation where I will likely qualify for CX's highest revenue tier some years, but not all. My butt-in-seat direct spend is probably at least 250k and less than 400k USD on CX/KA metal in the last 6 years,
... I'd rather just go somewhere where I can accumulate miles at a much faster pace. [/B]
... I'd rather just go somewhere where I can accumulate miles at a much faster pace. [/B]
My questions to QRC3288:
(1) Would you keep flying CX J/F class, just accumulate the miles in another program? If you answer yes, CX gets to keep your premium travel business, while manages to lower the "mileage" liabilities on their books at the same time.
(2) You would likely stop using CX for Y travel, no? Wouldn't that be better for CX because they can just treat all Y passengers as good (or as bad), rather than offering soft-product enhancements for their DMs as it stand now?
Pardon me for the questions directed to you, but I thought your response would be more helpful as you do have discretion over which carrier you choose.