Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CX879 Redirected...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 6:20 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP
Posts: 1,799
Just out of curiosity, given HKG is only a few hundred miles away from TPE, if they had some 744ER, then they wouldn't need to stop? Although if you are talking about a stop in ICN, then I'm pretty sure even the 744ER wouldn't make it back to HKG unless it glides in.
Awesom Andy is offline  
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 7:05 am
  #17  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BA Gold, JGC Sapphire, OZ Diamond, AF Silver, CX GR, Marriott Lifetime SL
Posts: 3,598
Wirelessly posted (iPhone 4: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I guess it just not worth another subfleet of like 5 744ER for one route. It's only 1-2 months of each year you have such issue and CX is clear to go with 77W anyway
ChrisLi is offline  
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 7:20 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
Then I wonder.

Why SQ and UA do not have such problem?
garykung is offline  
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 7:43 pm
  #19  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,245
Originally Posted by garykung
Then I wonder.

Why SQ and UA do not have such problem?
...no offense, but there isn't much to wonder about. I had it to me once on SQ2 in January 2007, back when they flew 747s on the route (they now fly 777s). Did a tech stop in TPE.
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 8:06 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
Originally Posted by Awesom Andy
Just out of curiosity, given HKG is only a few hundred miles away from TPE, if they had some 744ER, then they wouldn't need to stop? Although if you are talking about a stop in ICN, then I'm pretty sure even the 744ER wouldn't make it back to HKG unless it glides in.
QF is the only airlines that has 744ER.

Originally Posted by QRC3288
...no offense, but there isn't much to wonder about. I had it to me once on SQ2 in January 2007, back when they flew 747s on the route (they now fly 777s). Did a tech stop in TPE.
What I mean is when CX got diverted, why not their competitor have the same issue at the same time?

Route issue or load?
garykung is offline  
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 9:14 pm
  #21  
1M
50 Countries Visited
80 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 8,120
SQ now flies 77Ws on the HKG-SFO route. The 77Ws have the range to do the route non-stop except in the strongest of headwinds.
dkc192 is offline  
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 9:45 pm
  #22  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,245
Originally Posted by garykung
What I mean is when CX got diverted, why not their competitor have the same issue at the same time?

Route issue or load?
Neither!! Because they fly 777s (see my post)!
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 11:09 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
Originally Posted by jumbojet19920711
SQ now flies 77Ws on the HKG-SFO route. The 77Ws have the range to do the route non-stop except in the strongest of headwinds.
Originally Posted by QRC3288
Neither!! Because they fly 777s (see my post)!
That's the tricky issue.

For the record (based on Wikipedia) - 744 max range is 7260 and 773ER is 7930.

So when SQ 773ER does not have fuel issue, it is understandable that CX 744 need to divert to refuel.

How about CX 773ER does not have fuel issue, but neither UA has (UA uses 744)?
garykung is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 12:50 pm
  #24  
1M
50 Countries Visited
80 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 8,120
As to why UA 744s never seem to divert, I believe it is due to weight. UA doesn't have PTVs in Y, which makes the planes that much lighter (PTV boxes and cables take up a fair bit of weight). UA 744s also have PW engines, which are slightly more fuel efficient than the RR engines that CX has on most of their 744s.
dkc192 is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 9:38 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
Originally Posted by jumbojet19920711
As to why UA 744s never seem to divert, I believe it is due to weight. UA doesn't have PTVs in Y, which makes the planes that much lighter (PTV boxes and cables take up a fair bit of weight). UA 744s also have PW engines, which are slightly more fuel efficient than the RR engines that CX has on most of their 744s.
Yes - but UA has something more (which may balance out PTV) - Mail.
garykung is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 9:46 pm
  #26  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: UAL SPG Hyatt
Posts: 597
Looks like CX 873 which is the evening departure 744 flight SFO-HKG has done it again on 1/18 (TPE). So twice this week (1/16 and 1/18) so far ...

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/CPA873
SometimesFlyer is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 12:07 am
  #27  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: CX
Posts: 87
Originally Posted by garykung
Yes - but UA has something more (which may balance out PTV) - Mail.
Easy....they just simply offload the mail or denied boarding.... they would just decide which one is cheaper...
e39ng is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 3:57 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by garykung
Yes - but UA has something more (which may balance out PTV) - Mail.
In the past, CX had cargo on passenger flights as well. I do not know if they do anymore.
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 11:23 am
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 30,343
In SFO lounge now. CX 879 is delayed an hour so we are told at check in.

Does CX overnight its plane at SFO for the 879 morning departure? If so, what might be the reason for the delay?

We are told that the arrival time would only be 25 minutes late at 7:05PM - yeah I will believe it when we actually depart at 1PM and do not need a tech stop.
Happy is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 11:44 am
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
Originally Posted by e39ng
Easy....they just simply offload the mail or denied boarding.... they would just decide which one is cheaper...
As far as I know, CX VDB more pax than UA.
garykung is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.