![]() |
CX879 Redirected...
As shown on flight status, presumably due to bad weather. Looks to be the headwinds issue with the B744 again.
|
Will make its stop at TPE.
|
Anyone know if there is a Web Site that forecasts the headwinds across the Pacific? I'm on CX 879 on Tuesday and wonder on the likelihood of a Tapei tech stop.
|
Originally Posted by daveinsf
(Post 17821338)
Anyone know if there is a Web Site that forecasts the headwinds across the Pacific? I'm on CX 879 on Tuesday and wonder on the likelihood of a Tapei tech stop.
|
Actually the flight would have carried no cargo at all. 744 during winter time is payload restricted from North america. They got full pax and not enough people is willing to give up so a tech stop is required.
|
Originally Posted by e39ng
(Post 17821671)
Actually the flight would have carried no cargo at all. 744 during winter time is payload restricted from North america. They got full pax and not enough people is willing to give up so a tech stop is required.
|
I doubt they have many cargo out of USA nowadays .... I think I read somewhere those Freighter actually fly back to HK 2/3 empty
|
Originally Posted by kaka
(Post 17821683)
but if they had known its a full flight and is payload restricted to HKG, couldnt they get in some cargo and techstop at ICN instead?
|
Originally Posted by ChrisLi
(Post 17821799)
I doubt they have many cargo out of USA nowadays .... I think I read somewhere those Freighter actually fly back to HK 2/3 empty
|
Originally Posted by daveinsf
(Post 17821338)
Anyone know if there is a Web Site that forecasts the headwinds across the Pacific? I'm on CX 879 on Tuesday and wonder on the likelihood of a Tapei tech stop.
|
Originally Posted by e39ng
(Post 17822027)
Any airlines will try to avoid techstop at all cost. It is way too costly than denied boarding. By the time the check in counter closes (40mins before ETD), it will be too late for any cargo to be loaded to the plane.
|
Originally Posted by kaka
(Post 17826594)
deal: i was just thinking if they had to stop anyway, they might as well take the cargo. but yea. USA-asia has limited cargo and they still have their freighters.
|
Looks like 873 on 1/16 did the same. TPE.
|
So far looks like 1/17's 873 isn't showing a divert.
|
Originally Posted by QRC3288
(Post 17826671)
That's impressive then, I didn't realize how close to the edge of their range the 747s were flying on the SFO-HKG leg. If there isn't a full belly of cargo, then it means just the full compliment of pax/baggage alone + strong winds are enough to force a fuel stop. LAX must've been even worse. No wonder they want to switch those to 777s.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:41 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.