Are gate assignments random or do they have a pattern?
#17
Original Poster
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: YYJ
Posts: 2,230
is there any rule against visiting two lounges in one day?
after reading the various comments in this thread, i started thinking that if we end up flying out of the 520 gates maybe we can pop right into the pier upon landing to use the cabanas. then, walk down towards them and go into the wing for the remainder of the time. as i mentioned, we purposely chose a four-hour layover so we could visit the lounges and walk around the airport.
after reading the various comments in this thread, i started thinking that if we end up flying out of the 520 gates maybe we can pop right into the pier upon landing to use the cabanas. then, walk down towards them and go into the wing for the remainder of the time. as i mentioned, we purposely chose a four-hour layover so we could visit the lounges and walk around the airport.
#18
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
is there any rule against visiting two lounges in one day?
after reading the various comments in this thread, i started thinking that if we end up flying out of the 520 gates maybe we can pop right into the pier upon landing to use the cabanas. then, walk down towards them and go into the wing for the remainder of the time. as i mentioned, we purposely chose a four-hour layover so we could visit the lounges and walk around the airport.
after reading the various comments in this thread, i started thinking that if we end up flying out of the 520 gates maybe we can pop right into the pier upon landing to use the cabanas. then, walk down towards them and go into the wing for the remainder of the time. as i mentioned, we purposely chose a four-hour layover so we could visit the lounges and walk around the airport.
cxfan1960
CX CoMod
#19



Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,041
In Haneda too CX jets seem to hog around the same gate all the time. CX548 arrives in the afternoon and leaves again as CX549 in the evening. When CX542 arrives at night it will park at the gate where CX549 left in the evening, and that is where the plane will stay overnight. As that CX542 aircraft departs back to HKG in the next morning as CX543, the gate is temporarily unoccupied for 1 or 2 hours but is reserved for the incoming CX548 flight which is due to arrive in the afternoon.
And so the cycle continues.
Doesn't this also happen for LAX flights? Heard that CX881 and 885 seem to alternate the same gate at different times of the day, and 883 has its own dedicated one. Not sure if this is true though.
And so the cycle continues.
Doesn't this also happen for LAX flights? Heard that CX881 and 885 seem to alternate the same gate at different times of the day, and 883 has its own dedicated one. Not sure if this is true though.
#20


Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,242
Yes, while there are patterns for selected FLTs, it is random with regard to OP's question. OP first asked for the arrival gate of FLT, and all known patterns are departure-bound. OP then asked for the departure gate of a KA FLT that could be operated by either a 330 or a 320, and the latter sometimes depart from the satellite terminal.
Also, the only times I've ever LANDED on the south runway (which is normally used only for departures or the occasional cargo arrival) was early in the wee early morning, and then we taxied straight to one of the close (1-4) gates. It makes me think that at least when the airport isn't very busy, CX has leased enough gates from HKIA that they have some flexibility to makes pax lives' more convenient.
And not sure if it's a pattern, but the last few times I've taken CX347 back from PEK in the last few months I've arrived at one of the last gates in the 60s...which is where I've noticed some really outrageous transit lines. Again last week, I saw 100+ pax crammed in the arrival area waiting for the small transit area below gate 65ish. Thinking of FT I stood around to count people, and stopped when I hit 100. Really a disaster, but subject of another thread...long story short though, there is at least somewhat of a pattern for certain arrival flights. Ditto to the the guy who posted above, SQ1/2 (to/from SFO and SIN) regularly both arrives and departs from gate 21.
Last edited by QRC3288; Dec 27, 2011 at 5:53 pm
#21
Suspended
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
methinks selected airlines do try to go to gates near their handling agents/lounge... from experience.
as for CX, if a flight turns for long haul, they'd try to put them at 1-4. if not then 60s are not uncommon-cannot avoid since 15-36 are usually for others, especially at busy hours (I've had mid-day LHR at "the pier" gates. rare tho). if a CX flight turns for short haul, then the 60/70s. (hence arrivals are not too fixed but departure can be more predictable)
QF/BA are at 15-19, or sometimes at the odd numbered gates of 21-31. KE is usually 19/21/23. LH: 20 (apparently, almost 90% of the time). the "Chinese" airlines are 5xx or 40-5x.
as for CX, if a flight turns for long haul, they'd try to put them at 1-4. if not then 60s are not uncommon-cannot avoid since 15-36 are usually for others, especially at busy hours (I've had mid-day LHR at "the pier" gates. rare tho). if a CX flight turns for short haul, then the 60/70s. (hence arrivals are not too fixed but departure can be more predictable)
QF/BA are at 15-19, or sometimes at the odd numbered gates of 21-31. KE is usually 19/21/23. LH: 20 (apparently, almost 90% of the time). the "Chinese" airlines are 5xx or 40-5x.
#22




Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 8,116
Also, the only times I've ever LANDED on the south runway (which is normally used only for departures or the occasional cargo arrival) was early in the wee early morning, and then we taxied straight to one of the close (1-4) gates. It makes me think that at least when the airport isn't very busy, CX has leased enough gates from HKIA that they have some flexibility to makes pax lives' more convenient.
#23



Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,641
methinks selected airlines do try to go to gates near their handling agents/lounge... from experience.
as for CX, if a flight turns for long haul, they'd try to put them at 1-4. if not then 60s are not uncommon-cannot avoid since 15-36 are usually for others, especially at busy hours (I've had mid-day LHR at "the pier" gates. rare tho). if a CX flight turns for short haul, then the 60/70s. (hence arrivals are not too fixed but departure can be more predictable)
as for CX, if a flight turns for long haul, they'd try to put them at 1-4. if not then 60s are not uncommon-cannot avoid since 15-36 are usually for others, especially at busy hours (I've had mid-day LHR at "the pier" gates. rare tho). if a CX flight turns for short haul, then the 60/70s. (hence arrivals are not too fixed but departure can be more predictable)
There really is no distinction between short haul vs long haul for gate assignment with CX, save that because of the propensity of US bound flights to draw gates 3, 4 or 21, it tends to push short haul flights out towards the 60s. The rarest departure gates for CX are in the 15-19 area, though even now with a buildup of departures around the 1430-1630 and 2330+ mark it's not uncommon to see CX leave from there either.
Note also that gates 68, 70 and 71 cannot handle anything bigger than an A340 (no B777s or B747s), so these gates are usually assigned to CX A330s and A340s. Given the size of CX's A330 fleet and their propensity to fly regionals, this can again increase the perception that short haul flights tend to leave from those gates.
#24
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,783
[QUOTE=Top of climb;17702610]Note also that gates 68, 70 and 71 cannot handle anything bigger than an A340 (no B777s or B747s), so these gates are usually assigned to CX A330s and A340s. [QUOTE]
Just to correct you on something, I once saw a 77W heading for DME depart from gate 70 about a year ago when the 77W was used for a short amount of time.
Just to correct you on something, I once saw a 77W heading for DME depart from gate 70 about a year ago when the 77W was used for a short amount of time.
#25
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: CX DM, SG Krisfl, MH Enrich, Hyatt GP Diam, Priority Club Plat, Marriott SL, HHonors, SPG, AClub
Posts: 289
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/15321375-post10.html
The Wing (First Class) offers cabanas with shower, bathtub and chaise lounge. The Pier (First Class) does not offer cabanas but does have Dayrooms, which is a small room with a sleep chair and entertainment unit.

As others mentioned: With exception of certain long-haul flights, more or less random gates especially when it comes to PVG flights (that's where you're headed to?). But if you want to get into the F section of a CX lounge, then I think you have a better chance being faster (not necessarily closer) at a PVG flight departure gate with The Wing than with The Pier - that's my personal experience and is not representative. The direction of the train plays a major role to maximize your lounge time.
Hope this helps if you are eager to experience the cabanas.
Last edited by Connecta; Dec 28, 2011 at 12:00 pm
#27


Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Diamond (OW Emerald), former SQ Krisflyer Gold
Posts: 2,607
In my experience, gates are not random. I tend to fly the same routes a lot and find that gate assignments for those routes are usually somewhat sticky, at least within the same area.
#28
Original Poster
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: YYJ
Posts: 2,230
Strange that no one else has picked this up yet: You've mentioned in your original post and in the quoted one again that you wanted to visit the cabanas in The Pier lounge. The cabanas with open/airy feeling are only available in the F section of The Wing lounge, while The Pier has more private/closed Dayrooms:
…
As others mentioned: With exception of certain long-haul flights, more or less random gates especially when it comes to PVG flights (that's where you're headed to?). But if you want to get into the F section of a CX lounge, then I think you have a better chance being faster (not necessarily closer) at a PVG flight departure gate with The Wing than with The Pier - that's my personal experience and is not representative. The direction of the train plays a major role to maximize your lounge time.
Hope this helps if you are eager to experience the cabanas.
…
As others mentioned: With exception of certain long-haul flights, more or less random gates especially when it comes to PVG flights (that's where you're headed to?). But if you want to get into the F section of a CX lounge, then I think you have a better chance being faster (not necessarily closer) at a PVG flight departure gate with The Wing than with The Pier - that's my personal experience and is not representative. The direction of the train plays a major role to maximize your lounge time.
Hope this helps if you are eager to experience the cabanas.
I wasn't going to say anything but I'm happy that some have indeed picked up on this. My original question regarding gate assignments was specifically in relation to lounge use. I didn't want to make a fuss though.
Last edited by BenSenise; Dec 30, 2011 at 12:39 am

