Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

MH to join oneworld in late 2012. Effect on CX?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

MH to join oneworld in late 2012. Effect on CX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 2:58 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: No longer Diamond and missing the good old days of CX
Posts: 1,521
MH to join oneworld in late 2012. Effect on CX?

Read it all here:

Malaysia Airlines to join oneworld alliance

Malaysia Airlines is expected to start flying as part of oneworld late next year.

As it prepares for its alliance membership, Malaysia Airlines intends to develop bilateral links with a number of oneworld's established partners, who include some of the biggest and best names in the airline industry. It already code-shares with oneworld partners Cathay Pacific and Royal Jordanian.

...

Last edited by kchika; Jun 6, 2011 at 3:34 am
kchika is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 3:10 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 768
Not much effect on CX I expect. Can only add oil to the fire on the A380 discussion in a different thread and say that with MH they could pool maintenance etc
Mrtnw is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 3:16 am
  #3  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX MarcoPolo (SL), BA Executive Club (GO)
Posts: 1,875
Im sure further codeshare on flights between HKG and Malaysia. If not all of the flights between HKG and KUL are code-share Im sure they might soon all be. there could also be codeshare to and from Penang and HKG. I think a codeshare is already in place with KA between HKG and Kota Kinabulu?

Maybe it could bring KA to codeshare a scheduled flight to Langkawi?
CX828 is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 3:40 am
  #4  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 315
Should be early to join!

Y not early! This year I'm going MLE! Fr SQ, it's HK$7K HKG-SIN-MLE return the cheapest for no mileage at all!
TalkFlyer is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 3:52 am
  #5  
sxc
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,797
I hope it means cheaper fares as there's now an additional alternative to Europe/Asia/Australia.
sxc is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 9:47 pm
  #6  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,205
Definitely more choices for Oneworld members flying
Europe - Malaysia
Australia - Malaysia
Europe - Australia
Asia - South Africa / South America

Look forward to it, especially after they revamp their A330 and B737 aircraft.
zhaobao is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 6:12 am
  #7  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by sxc
I hope it means cheaper fares as there's now an additional alternative to Europe/Asia/Australia.
collusion is the most likely result. Price-fixing instead of competing.
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 7:09 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Marco Polo
Posts: 96
Well, CX will lose us as holiday J customers for South and SouthEast Asia. I can stomach HK$30,000 to JFK ex TPE, but not HK$15,000-20,000 for Singapore ex HKG. Cathay's product is second to none, but MH's price for product is good enough for short and medium haul, like the Maldives.
dietevil is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 7:11 am
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: No longer Diamond and missing the good old days of CX
Posts: 1,521
Originally Posted by dietevil
Well, CX will lose us as holiday J customers for South and SouthEast Asia. I can stomach HK$30,000 to JFK ex TPE, but not HK$15,000-20,000 for Singapore ex HKG. Cathay's product is second to none, but MH's price for product is good enough for short and medium haul, like the Maldives.
Try SQ.
kchika is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 8:54 am
  #10  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by kchika
Try SQ.
CX really need to fix their Y seat. Reading all the different airline review sites on the internet, and the Y seat is by far the #1 complain for all the people with negative reviews. I can't believe CX posts in their magazine, with a straight face, that "some people like the Y seats", who are they?
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 9:23 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MHT/BOS <--> World
Programs: AA Plat 2.8MM
Posts: 4,629
Originally Posted by kchika
Try SQ.
I prefer the CX longhual F to the SQ longhaul F seat. kchika - have you flown both to compare? Its a matter of preference, not that one is definitly better.
wanaflyforless is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 1:18 pm
  #12  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by wanaflyforless
I prefer the CX longhual F to the SQ longhaul F seat. kchika - have you flown both to compare? Its a matter of preference, not that one is definitly better.
Not counting the SQ suite right...
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 3:14 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MHT/BOS <--> World
Programs: AA Plat 2.8MM
Posts: 4,629
Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
Not counting the SQ suite right...
I am comparing to SQ F on the 77W.
wanaflyforless is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 7:45 pm
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: No longer Diamond and missing the good old days of CX
Posts: 1,521
Originally Posted by wanaflyforless
I prefer the CX longhual F to the SQ longhaul F seat. kchika - have you flown both to compare? Its a matter of preference, not that one is definitly better.
My reply in the another thread:
Originally Posted by kchika
QRC3288, the Suites on SQ are, as SQ advertised, "a class beyond First". So you're comparing apples and oranges there. I've flown in the Suites once before, and boy was I impressed. The A380 is a very quiet plane, and coupled with the fact that you won't see anybody else I'll gladly say that SQ's Suites are miles ahead of CX F. I doubt anyone could top their product for a good 5-10 years.

If you want to compare CX F to SQ F, then it's a no brainer. The F cabin on SQ's 77Ws lacks privacy and the seat is very uncomfortable in its lounging position. CX's hardware is vastly superior in that regard. The software, though, is another story.
Yes, I've flown SQ F on their 388, 77W and 744. As far as I'm concerned, SQ (apart from their 77W F seat) blows CX out of the water in just about everything.
kchika is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 7:56 pm
  #15  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Diamond (OW Emerald), former SQ Krisflyer Gold
Posts: 2,608
Originally Posted by kchika
My reply in the another thread:

Yes, I've flown SQ F on their 388, 77W and 744. As far as I'm concerned, SQ (apart from their 77W F seat) blows CX out of the water in just about everything.
Especially on the regional J seat. SQ's new regional J seat makes CX regional J feel like Economy class.

Has anybody from CX management bothered to fly on the new SQ regional J to try it out? Or are they just ignoring the problem and hoping that nobody notices?
midlevels is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.