BA announces new rules for tktg Concorde
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,993
BA announces new rules for tktg Concorde
Due to the high demand and the limited number of seats on the remaining Concorde services the following amendments have been made to the full R class Concorde fares:
For travel on/before 16 October 03:
Prior to 7 days before departure all tickets are changeable and refundable
All reservations must be ticketed 7 days before departure
Within 7 days of departure tickets must be issued at time of booking
If tickets not purchased within the above parameters, reservations will be cancelled
Within 7 days of departure all tickets are non-changeable and non-refundable.
For travel on/after 17 October 03:
Tickets must be issued within 7 days of reservation
Within 7 days of departure tickets must be issued at time of booking
If tickets are not purchased, reservations will be cancelled
All tickets are non-changeable and non-refundable
For travel on/before 16 October 03:
Prior to 7 days before departure all tickets are changeable and refundable
All reservations must be ticketed 7 days before departure
Within 7 days of departure tickets must be issued at time of booking
If tickets not purchased within the above parameters, reservations will be cancelled
Within 7 days of departure all tickets are non-changeable and non-refundable.
For travel on/after 17 October 03:
Tickets must be issued within 7 days of reservation
Within 7 days of departure tickets must be issued at time of booking
If tickets are not purchased, reservations will be cancelled
All tickets are non-changeable and non-refundable
#2
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Programs: BA/VS Gold, Marriott Plat, HH Diamond
Posts: 628
I think a big part of why the flying public puts up with non-changeable, non-refundable tickets is that the risk is usually so small in absolute monetary terms. But I would never ever pay thousands and thousands of pounds for a ticket that'd be null and void if I oversleep, get stuck in traffic, or have something come up that absolutely needs my presence (without anyone dying).
I've missed flights countless times in my life -- most of those times I've been wise enough to pay a surcharge that permits it without penalty.
I guess a few thousand quid has to literally mean nothing to you if you find these terms acceptable.
I've missed flights countless times in my life -- most of those times I've been wise enough to pay a surcharge that permits it without penalty.
I guess a few thousand quid has to literally mean nothing to you if you find these terms acceptable.
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,597
I think that given the peculiar situation with Concorde retiring, putting these restrictions on such expensive tickets are reasonable.
If concerned about missing flights et al, normal First class tickets have no such restrictions
Dave
If concerned about missing flights et al, normal First class tickets have no such restrictions
Dave
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Markonen:
I guess a few thousand quid has to literally mean nothing to you if you find these terms acceptable.</font>
I guess a few thousand quid has to literally mean nothing to you if you find these terms acceptable.</font>
#5
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Programs: BA/VS Gold, Marriott Plat, HH Diamond
Posts: 628
Yup. Now that I think about it, it seems that significantly overbooking these flights would be very dangerous for BA. Like Globaliser illustrated, they probably don't get that many no shows. With this in mind, some restrictions do make sense.
I think the no changes restriction is a no-brainer, but I think that some sort of investment protection (for example, rebooking in F permitted) would've been in order.
Well, I'm happy I managed to get one of the last award seats so that I don't have to worry about this
I think the no changes restriction is a no-brainer, but I think that some sort of investment protection (for example, rebooking in F permitted) would've been in order.
Well, I'm happy I managed to get one of the last award seats so that I don't have to worry about this
#6
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: QF WP; VA Gold
Posts: 1,007
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Markonen:
Yup. Now that I think about it, it seems that significantly overbooking these flights would be very dangerous for BA. Like Globaliser illustrated, they probably don't get that many no shows. With this in mind, some restrictions do make sense.
</font>
Yup. Now that I think about it, it seems that significantly overbooking these flights would be very dangerous for BA. Like Globaliser illustrated, they probably don't get that many no shows. With this in mind, some restrictions do make sense.
</font>
The aim of the above will to be to ensure that every remaing seat on the remaining services has a bum on it or else at least earning revenue.
Enjoy your flight!
#8
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA PLT; SPG G
Posts: 383
Many airlines used similar rules on F-class tickets at the turn of the milennium for an expected boom in business that never materialized. US carriers occasionally implement them for huge events like the Super Bowl.
------------------
...or passengers swim.
------------------
...or passengers swim.
#9
Used to be Sydneysider
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ScottC:
And how is this news? BA implemented these rules back on the 18th of June...
</font>
And how is this news? BA implemented these rules back on the 18th of June...
</font>
I guess not everyone is as up as you are on all of BA's happenings.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 37,486
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ender83:
I guess not everyone is as up as you are on all of BA's happenings.</font>
I guess not everyone is as up as you are on all of BA's happenings.</font>
#11
Used to be Sydneysider
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ScottC:
I posted it here on FT the day it happened so spare me your
</font>
I posted it here on FT the day it happened so spare me your
</font>
If a thread is redundant to you, I would encourage you to ignore it instead of posting your smart-... comments.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 37,486
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ender83:
The point is that not everyone checks this board daily, so while not news to you and I, it may have been to some people.
If a thread is redundant to you, I would encourage you to ignore it instead of posting your smart-... comments.</font>
The point is that not everyone checks this board daily, so while not news to you and I, it may have been to some people.
If a thread is redundant to you, I would encourage you to ignore it instead of posting your smart-... comments.</font>