Heathrow cutting capacity
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Programs: Ba Silver ( for now!)
Posts: 776
Heathrow cutting capacity
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/h...hird-6q5cbfhd0
given ba is the largest carrier at Heathrow I assume this is going to have a significant impact.
I wonder how this will play out ? The restrictions seem time of day specific bit if you only have one flight a day to many destinations and if they depart in the restricted period ….
good to see the U.K. is prospering and open for business.
the mess is getting worse not better.
I am currently sitting on an easyJet flight from Palma. The 10:45 is cancelled. The next flight to the U.K. is Wednesday - so a lot of stuck people and of course is it not just one flight being cancelled at nil notice.
given ba is the largest carrier at Heathrow I assume this is going to have a significant impact.
I wonder how this will play out ? The restrictions seem time of day specific bit if you only have one flight a day to many destinations and if they depart in the restricted period ….
good to see the U.K. is prospering and open for business.
the mess is getting worse not better.
I am currently sitting on an easyJet flight from Palma. The 10:45 is cancelled. The next flight to the U.K. is Wednesday - so a lot of stuck people and of course is it not just one flight being cancelled at nil notice.
#5
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK
Programs: BA Silver, IHG Platinum
Posts: 943
This is about as much as I can get out of it. I am not a subscriber.
Seems to be only The Times carrying this story at the moment.
Thousands of passengers a day are to be prevented from booking flights out of Heathrow until at least next month as Britain’s biggest airport takes drastic action to tackle the overcrowding and cancellations that have brought misery to holidaymakers. Heathrow has ordered airlines to cut by a third the number of passengers flying from its terminals at certain times of the day until July 3, warning: “Without a reduction in demand, the operation would not be considered safe.”
Last edited by Bohinjska Bistrica; Jun 5, 2022 at 3:19 am
#7
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Programs: BA Silver, Hilton Diamond, BD Blue (RIP)
Posts: 1,986
Another key bit
“The curbs, which started to come into force last month, will apply to all airlines using Heathrow, with details to be decided by the Heathrow slot committee.Flights will be withdrawn, and the cut in capacity is also likely to push up prices, deterring some passengers from making new bookings.”
So this isn’t necessarily new.
“The curbs, which started to come into force last month, will apply to all airlines using Heathrow, with details to be decided by the Heathrow slot committee.Flights will be withdrawn, and the cut in capacity is also likely to push up prices, deterring some passengers from making new bookings.”
So this isn’t necessarily new.
#8
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 726
I wonder who/what made Heathrow do this given the safety considerations, unlike Heathrow to voluntarily give up revenue
If I was an airline which spent $$ millions on certain slots I'd be pretty annoyed to be told I cant use them!
If I was an airline which spent $$ millions on certain slots I'd be pretty annoyed to be told I cant use them!
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, SQ Gold, KQ Platinum, IHG Diamond Ambassador, Hilton Gold, Marriott Silver, Accor Silver
Posts: 16,350
It's a mix of resource constraints across different parties that coupled with demand would create unsafe overcrowding in check-in, security and immigration (to varying degrees depending on the terminal, time of day and date).
#10
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 2,221
So, perhaps, restricting capacity in the short term is the least worst option.
#11
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 726
They will argue, and rightly so, that a significant constraint has been put on the labour market. Of course, offering a higher wage will attract more applicants but how would this play out in the wider economy? I'm no economist but, would we not be heading for stagflation?
So, perhaps, restricting capacity in the short term is the least worst option.
So, perhaps, restricting capacity in the short term is the least worst option.
Heathrow/airlines I doubt are worried about stagflation, if they were willing to offer a higher wage they would do so if it directly benefits them rather than being a good economic citizen and worrying about any minor economic impacts their individual decision(s) may have on the economy as a whole
(although seems they would rather lobby the government for cheaper labour as per Ryanair's comments last week)
Dublin and Sydney have airport issues due to labour shortages, and various American carriers too are encountering issues with shortage of labour so I think the industry as a whole needs a good look at the proposition its offering employees post pandemic. Shift work and & anti social hours, low wages and dealing with the public aren't generally attractive characteristics!
#12
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK
Programs: BA Silver, IHG Platinum
Posts: 943
The largest underlying reason for this is that they laid off too many employees,
Many of those employees will have found other jobs and might well be happier without the downsides of working in an airport, especially the unsociable hours. Many of them probably have no intention of going back to an industry that dropped them whilst government support was available; something that is no doubt weighing on minds of potential new recruits as well. And yes, some will have left the country.
Once again, their boasts of 'we are ready, drop the restrictions' ring hollow. What a mess.
Many of those employees will have found other jobs and might well be happier without the downsides of working in an airport, especially the unsociable hours. Many of them probably have no intention of going back to an industry that dropped them whilst government support was available; something that is no doubt weighing on minds of potential new recruits as well. And yes, some will have left the country.
Once again, their boasts of 'we are ready, drop the restrictions' ring hollow. What a mess.
#13
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,237
Brexit plays a big part because a large % of the security and engineering workers were Poles or however Central Europeans. Many have left, either for home or elsewhere, and they can’t be bothered to return. Either they get a good enough wage home, or they’ve been disgusted by the way HAL treated them (I know a couple guys who have been treated very poorly) or, well, have had enough of the ‘hostile environment’.
Now HAL is really struggling to hire; on one side (engineering) the skills are in low supply. On the other (security) the native population just isn’t interested, or doesn’t stay in the job long enough… then there’s the obvious bottleneck of vetting, training and providing passes to those who join. I described in another thread how shambolic the airside pass renewal system was over at HAL in 2018; if I remember properly the lead time was something like 4-5 weeks there. Now… who knows.
I have very little sympathy for the airlines for the mess they’re in, I have even less sympathy for HMG because they contributed (through Brexit and through a very confused C19 policy) to the mess, but I have ZERO sympathy for HAL. They have created their own mess by being historically focussed at giving out dividends rather than running an airport. They went for the short term benefit of cutting staff with not so much as a thought about the next steps (I heard they even culled a lot of people in their pass issuing team, though I can’t verify it), they had the sheer audacity of asking for way-above-average increases to the world’s highest fees and now they’re doing this. Their only saving grace is that they’re the airport people want to fly to and that other hubs in Europe are being even worse than them. Well at least one of them is (AMS).
#15
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 726
Brexit plays a big part because a large % of the security and engineering workers were Poles or however Central Europeans. Many have left, either for home or elsewhere, and they can’t be bothered to return. Either they get a good enough wage home, or they’ve been disgusted by the way HAL treated them (I know a couple guys who have been treated very poorly) or, well, have had enough of the ‘hostile environment’.
Still, I'm sure their management is compensated well ensuring they can "attract top talent" at the exec level so I'm surprised they cant seem to manage this!
Agree airlines have bought this on themselves by focusing on investors rather than customers and staff over recent years. WW and AC have been shown to be poor stewards of the airline given the challenges SD has inherited.
One thing I cant work out is the UK Government - why didnt they streamline things like background checks prior to removing travel restrictions? They knew what position they were in so this at least could have mitigated the issues somewhat. (and why didnt the airports/airlines shout about this when it was obvious the Gov wasnt preparing itself?)
One common theme here is management and leadership has been found woefully inadequate across the industry. Its not hard to manage things when economies are booming, actually having to make difficult decisions and get them right most of the time is what they are paid for and they dont appear to have this skillset.