25 Feb : Russia closes airspace to British aircraft, BA flights affected.
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SAN
Programs: Nothing, nowhere!
Posts: 23,306
I believe 'direct' can involve a stop.
#33
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Helvetia
Programs: AS; BA Silver; UA; HH Gold; Sprüngli Connaisseur
Posts: 2,912
And plane changes. I was once on an UA flight from HNL-AKL that originated in FRA, and had already stopped at IAD and LAX. I also had a direct flight from ZRH to DEN with a stop and plane change at IAD. The flight numbers remained the same.
#34
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gloucestershire
Programs: BA Gold (ex-GGL, maybe future Silver), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,201
#35
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,607
Russia can deny overflights though and that's a huge deal for the rest of the world. Even if you don't plan to land in Russia there are a lot of routes where it's worth paying Russia fairly large fees just for overflight rights. Flying around Russia adds a lot of time and expense to routes that don't ever land there. And Russia can do that indefinitely without hurting its own citizens aside from losing the income stream from airlines.
#36
Join Date: Jul 2017
Programs: Mucci Chevalier des Internautes Amables; BAEC
Posts: 971
Isnt it a 'closing Russian airspace to BA/British airlines' thread? Regardless, it is probably interesting to most BA flyers as would not be easily discoverable otherwise. FT, and the BA pages in particular, are my first port of call in any flying matter...
#37
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: LHR-ish
Programs: BA: ex-Silver, now Blue. VS: Gold
Posts: 87
Quite a number of those aircraft seen avoiding Russian airspace to the east of Ukraine, which is also closed, are internal Russian flights. MOW-AER loses considerable time going via Kazak airspace.
#38
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Programs: AA, HH, UA, Amtrak
Posts: 270
Yes, I had been on a flight like that between DEL-NRT, that had some disembarkation only in BKK. Also, I think it was a medical crew that got down, not regular commercial pax.
#39
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Programs: BA Silver, Hilton Diamond, BD Blue (RIP)
Posts: 1,986
Yup I did this on (ironically) Aeroflot from Rome to Tokyo via Moscow. The flight was marketed as SU263 throughout but the first leg was an A321 and the final one a 777. I think it did mean that they held the 777 because the 321 arrived late though.
#41
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Australia
Programs: QF LTS, Marriott LTP, ALL GOLD
Posts: 2,440
#42
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,203
The routing also has to consider oxygen and engine failure driftdown requirements with regards to the terrain. On top of that there are certain areas we do not flyover for other reasons and hence the routing you see. No Russian FIRs are entered.
#43
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,926
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
If there is a depressurisation, then crew and passengers have to go on to supplemental oxygen until the aircraft can descend to a safe altitude at which supplemental oxygen is no longer required, but there can only be a limited supply on board.
If there is an engine failure, the aircraft may not be able to maintain its altitude and will have to descend because of the reduction in engine power.
If there is high terrain, then either kind of emergency would leave the aircraft in a dangerous position. The supplemental oxygen might run out if the aircraft cannot descend soon enough, or the aircraft may not be able to stay safely away from the terrain with the remaining operating engine(s). So route planning must take this into account.
One of the more high-profile planning exercises was undertaken by Qantas, when it was interested in using the L888 airway over the Tibetan plateau. Some randomly-found stuff here about it, including discussion about these requirements and about the need to plan escape routes off the airway in an emergency to allow the aircraft to descend as required:
If there is an engine failure, the aircraft may not be able to maintain its altitude and will have to descend because of the reduction in engine power.
If there is high terrain, then either kind of emergency would leave the aircraft in a dangerous position. The supplemental oxygen might run out if the aircraft cannot descend soon enough, or the aircraft may not be able to stay safely away from the terrain with the remaining operating engine(s). So route planning must take this into account.
One of the more high-profile planning exercises was undertaken by Qantas, when it was interested in using the L888 airway over the Tibetan plateau. Some randomly-found stuff here about it, including discussion about these requirements and about the need to plan escape routes off the airway in an emergency to allow the aircraft to descend as required: