Bangkok dropped or timetable glitch?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: BAEC Gold. Hilton Diamond
Posts: 409
Bangkok dropped or timetable glitch?
Does anyone know if the route has been officially dropped in 2021? Timetable only showing to and including March 27 for BKK-LHR whereas it should be showing to and including Apr 2 as at today’s date. If I use the booking engine, it just returns results via KUL from Mar 28 with a codeshare on Bangkok Airways and then BA to London. I am wondering if it’s an IT issue as if I check Hong Kong to London (one way), an error message is returned for Apr 1 and Apr 2 but if I select Mar 31 (within timetables), results are then returned for Apr 1 and Apr 2. Also, the Hong Kong timetable seems to work fine for Apr 1 and Apr 2 if it’s queried as a return flight from London, outbound March and then return Apr 1 or Apr 2. How mysterious! Many thanks in advance for any ideas.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: BAEC Gold. Hilton Diamond
Posts: 409
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: BAEC Gold. Hilton Diamond
Posts: 409
Thanks Chris. I thought so too but then I’m always reading on Flyertalk about how Bangkok isn’t a profitable route for BA and we’re already starting to see some strange route decisions such as the loss of Helsinki.
#8
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 1,387
I am not trying to be unhelpful and I apologise if it came over that way. I am simply saying that whether a route is or is not bookable for next April is probably a poor indicator of whether or not the planes will actually fly.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: BAEC Gold. Hilton Diamond
Posts: 409
#11
Join Date: Feb 2015
Programs: BA Gold, Avis President
Posts: 438
Actually it does beg the question as to what sort of airline is going to emerge from all this...
I suspect BA will become even more aggressively bottom line focussed with any aspirate nod towards its "Imperial" past finally put to rest. The elimination of free food in Y on European routes being the least of it compared to what could come...
Think out of the box...
I suspect BA will become even more aggressively bottom line focussed with any aspirate nod towards its "Imperial" past finally put to rest. The elimination of free food in Y on European routes being the least of it compared to what could come...
Think out of the box...
- Stop being a full service airline by removal of F class and closure of Concorde room
- Minor enhancements to J class to compensate
- More lounge sharing, reduction of facilities and outright closure of lounges around the world except major hubs.
- Stop pretending to be a worldwide airline by closure of any route deemed unprofitable
- Extend and deepen Oneworld alliance to compensate for route closures...and increase profitability by reducing competition.
- You keep LHR to LAX and we'll keep LHR to etc etc…and then jack up prices.
- The future of airline travel is likely to be a) expensive in any class b) service will be bare bone
- Oh, and for BA Exec members...nuts to them... If they want to be snobs and pretend we care and go on silly tier point runs to keep their status up for what's left, then good luck to them...
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: BAEC Gold. Hilton Diamond
Posts: 409
Thank you - good advice but I do actually prefer BA wherever possible because despite all the bashing, it’s the who crew make it for me.
#13
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: BAEC Gold. Hilton Diamond
Posts: 409
Actually it does beg the question as to what sort of airline is going to emerge from all this...
I suspect BA will become even more aggressively bottom line focussed with any aspirate nod towards its "Imperial" past finally put to rest. The elimination of free food in Y on European routes being the least of it compared to what could come...
Think out of the box...
I suspect BA will become even more aggressively bottom line focussed with any aspirate nod towards its "Imperial" past finally put to rest. The elimination of free food in Y on European routes being the least of it compared to what could come...
Think out of the box...
- Stop being a full service airline by removal of F class and closure of Concorde room
- Minor enhancements to J class to compensate
- More lounge sharing, reduction of facilities and outright closure of lounges around the world except major hubs.
- Stop pretending to be a worldwide airline by closure of any route deemed unprofitable
- Extend and deepen Oneworld alliance to compensate for route closures...and increase profitability by reducing competition.
- You keep LHR to LAX and we'll keep LHR to etc etc…and then jack up prices.
- The future of airline travel is likely to be a) expensive in any class b) service will be bare bone
- Oh, and for BA Exec members...nuts to them... If they want to be snobs and pretend we care and go on silly tier point runs to keep their status up for what's left, then good luck to them...
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,600
Removing unprofitable routes is something that should be happening - BA isn't a charity ( unless their lack of profitability on their own is offset by money from connectin traffic )
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,197
BA operates many routes that individually may make a loss but overall because of connections they make money. Thats why looking at a route in isolation is not a good idea. You can bet your last threpence ha'penny that if the BKK route was a loss maker (taking into account connecting traffic) then BA would end it.
HEL is a different proposition. There are several AY flights a day so no real reason for BA to operate it's own.