BA371 MRS-LHR. Long delay [3 Nov 2019]
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,097
Thankfully we follow the law and not what you think is best!
#33
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,464
May I defer you to this thread, where there are innumerable examples of BA choosing to not follow the law - often bending the truth somewhat in order to not uphold their legal obligations:
The 2019 BA compensation thread: Your guide to Regulation EC261/2004
The 2019 BA compensation thread: Your guide to Regulation EC261/2004
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,097
May I defer you to this thread, where there are innumerable examples of BA choosing to not follow the law - often bending the truth somewhat in order to not uphold their legal obligations:
The 2019 BA compensation thread: Your guide to Regulation EC261/2004
The 2019 BA compensation thread: Your guide to Regulation EC261/2004
#36
#37
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,246
Post #11 included details of flights that weren’t diverted, hence my interest in more details which were kindly provided in posts #24 and #25.
#38
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,968
Are you suggesting the BA diversion (and all the others) wasn’t due to weather and that this is something for which compensation should be paid?
#39
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,246
#40
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 19
I don't know what point you think you are making here. EC261 expects airlines to take all reasonable measures to minimise the effects of cancellations (and long delays are treated as de facto cancellations).
Thus, it is not the passenger's concern how an airline operates, simply their right to claim compensation and have the Courts or arbitrators decide whether the airline took all reasonable measures. This is not my opinion, it is a matter of fact.
Why you conflate this with operating in line with the law (which I would expect any legitimate carrier to do) is beyond me.
Just for the avoidance of doubt, I am neither stating nor implying that BA did not take all reasonable measures in this case.
Thus, it is not the passenger's concern how an airline operates, simply their right to claim compensation and have the Courts or arbitrators decide whether the airline took all reasonable measures. This is not my opinion, it is a matter of fact.
Why you conflate this with operating in line with the law (which I would expect any legitimate carrier to do) is beyond me.
Just for the avoidance of doubt, I am neither stating nor implying that BA did not take all reasonable measures in this case.
#41
Fontaine d'honneur du Flyertalk
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Morbihan, France
Programs: Reine des Muccis de Pucci; Foreign Elitist (according to others)
Posts: 19,179
I’m grateful to all who contributed here. My friend landed in London 8 hours late. He subsequently got an A flight to JFK so arrived late, exhausted, but safe and sound.
The question now becomes complex. That the initial delay was due to a weather diversion and the subsequent repositioning of the aircraft is unquestionably far from anyone’s direct control. However, another long delay of nearly four hours occurred because the aircraft went tech. I have told him to claim, and to be persistent. Almost certainly one delay morphed into another The passengers were told hat there was an air conditioning problem.
Id be interested to know your thoughts as this is not a cut-and- dried issue in my view.
The question now becomes complex. That the initial delay was due to a weather diversion and the subsequent repositioning of the aircraft is unquestionably far from anyone’s direct control. However, another long delay of nearly four hours occurred because the aircraft went tech. I have told him to claim, and to be persistent. Almost certainly one delay morphed into another The passengers were told hat there was an air conditioning problem.
Id be interested to know your thoughts as this is not a cut-and- dried issue in my view.
#42
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 15,928
#43
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,540
I’m grateful to all who contributed here. My friend landed in London 8 hours late. He subsequently got an A flight to JFK so arrived late, exhausted, but safe and sound.
The question now becomes complex. That the initial delay was due to a weather diversion and the subsequent repositioning of the aircraft is unquestionably far from anyone’s direct control. However, another long delay of nearly four hours occurred because the aircraft went tech. I have told him to claim, and to be persistent. Almost certainly one delay morphed into another The passengers were told hat there was an air conditioning problem.
Id be interested to know your thoughts as this is not a cut-and- dried issue in my view.
The question now becomes complex. That the initial delay was due to a weather diversion and the subsequent repositioning of the aircraft is unquestionably far from anyone’s direct control. However, another long delay of nearly four hours occurred because the aircraft went tech. I have told him to claim, and to be persistent. Almost certainly one delay morphed into another The passengers were told hat there was an air conditioning problem.
Id be interested to know your thoughts as this is not a cut-and- dried issue in my view.
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,097
I don't know what point you think you are making here. EC261 expects airlines to take all reasonable measures to minimise the effects of cancellations (and long delays are treated as de facto cancellations).
Thus, it is not the passenger's concern how an airline operates, simply their right to claim compensation and have the Courts or arbitrators decide whether the airline took all reasonable measures. This is not my opinion, it is a matter of fact.
Why you conflate this with operating in line with the law (which I would expect any legitimate carrier to do) is beyond me.
Just for the avoidance of doubt, I am neither stating nor implying that BA did not take all reasonable measures in this case.
Thus, it is not the passenger's concern how an airline operates, simply their right to claim compensation and have the Courts or arbitrators decide whether the airline took all reasonable measures. This is not my opinion, it is a matter of fact.
Why you conflate this with operating in line with the law (which I would expect any legitimate carrier to do) is beyond me.
Just for the avoidance of doubt, I am neither stating nor implying that BA did not take all reasonable measures in this case.
#45
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: London. Edinburgh, Cornwall
Programs: BA GGL, British Midland Lifetime* Loser
Posts: 7,950
However, another long delay of nearly four hours occurred because the aircraft went tech. I have told him to claim, and to be persistent. Almost certainly one delay morphed into another The passengers were told hat there was an air conditioning problem.
Id be interested to know your thoughts as this is not a cut-and- dried issue in my view.
Id be interested to know your thoughts as this is not a cut-and- dried issue in my view.
Frankly they should have been getting your friend out of MRS on another carrier long before any of this but that's incompatible with making a chunky profit so there we are.
BTW Storm Amelie wasn't just "a bit of weather" it was deadly storms and subsequent flooding. Across the border in Italy, people died. BA did well to get to MPL, frankly.